IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p6040-d893346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coal Modeling Investigations in International Collaboration in the Light of Bibliometric Analysis of the Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Saramak

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Daniel Saramak

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

The article concerns an analysis of records registered in Web of Science (WoS) database related to the problem of coal modeling. All publications registered in the WoS from the time period 1951–2021 were analyzed, mostly in terms of international collaboration, merit content and research areas. It appeared that international scientific cooperation on this topic is differently considered, depending on the country. The leader in terms of the number of documents remains China, while the highest citation counts were gained by research teams, with the USA as the leader. Several sub-categories within research areas could be also divided on the basis of key words, while the most popular topic is connected with energetical aspects of coal utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Saramak & Daniel Saramak, 2022. "Coal Modeling Investigations in International Collaboration in the Light of Bibliometric Analysis of the Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6040-:d:893346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/6040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/6040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Massimo Franceschet, 2009. "A cluster analysis of scholar and journal bibliometric indicators," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(10), pages 1950-1964, October.
    3. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    4. Kulshreshtha, Mudit & Parikh, Jyoti K., 2000. "Modeling demand for coal in India: vector autoregressive models with cointegrated variables," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 149-168.
    5. Wen, Xu & Luo, Kun & Luo, Yujuan & Kassem, Hassan I. & Jin, Hanhui & Fan, Jianren, 2016. "Large eddy simulation of a semi-industrial scale coal furnace using non-adiabatic three-stream flamelet/progress variable model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1086-1097.
    6. Benzheng Li & Yongkui Shi & Jian Hao & Chengyun Ma & Chuming Pang & Huidi Yang, 2022. "Research on a Carbon Emission Calculation Model and Method for an Underground Fully Mechanized Mining Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Gleb Belov & Natashia L. Boland & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & Peter J. Stuckey, 2020. "Logistics optimization for a coal supply chain," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 269-300, April.
    8. Strizhak, Pavel A. & Vershinina, Ksenia Yu., 2017. "Maximum combustion temperature for coal-water slurry containing petrochemicals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 34-46.
    9. Qian Zhang & Hai Shen & Yuanyuan Huo, 2021. "An Evaluation Model of Green Coal Supplier for Thermal Power Supply Chain Based on PCA-SVM," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-8, September.
    10. Korski, Jacek & Tobór–Osadnik, Katarzyna & Wyganowska, Małgorzata, 2016. "Reasons of problems of the polish hard coal mining in connection with restructuring changes in the period 1988–2014," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 25-31.
    11. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko & Marek Szafraniec, 2020. "Scientific Landscape of Smart and Sustainable Cities Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Théodore Nikiema & Eugène C. Ezin & Sylvain Kpenavoun Chogou, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of the State of Research on Agroecology Adoption and Methods Used for Its Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Minh-Hieu Le & Wen-Min Lu & Jui-Chen Chang, 2023. "Recycling E-Waste and the Sustainable Economy: A Bibliometric Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Rocío González-Sánchez & Sara Alonso-Muñoz & María Sonia Medina-Salgado, 2023. "Circularity in waste management: a research proposal to achieve the 2030 Agenda," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1520-1540, September.
    5. Mathew Azarian & Hao Yu & Asmamaw Tadege Shiferaw & Tor Kristian Stevik, 2023. "Do We Perform Systematic Literature Review Right? A Scientific Mapping and Methodological Assessment," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    7. Itsuki Kageyama & Karin Kurata & Shuto Miyashita & Yeongjoo Lim & Shintaro Sengoku & Kota Kodama, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Brenda Melissa Fonseca & Lélis Pedro Andrade & Bruno César Melo Moreira, 2023. "Bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the scientific field in taxation," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Ahmet F. Aysan & Zhamal Nanaeva, 2022. "Fintech as a Financial Disruptor: A Bibliometric Analysis," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Derlie Mateo-Babiano, 2023. "The Transition of Land Use and Road Safety Studies: A Systematic Literature Review (2000–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun & Chen, Xun-Qi & Lei, Yu-Tian & Wang, Yi-Ran, 2023. "Sustainable finance and blockchain: A systematic review and research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Yin Junjia & Aidi Hizami Alias & Nuzul Azam Haron & Nabilah Abu Bakar, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review on Safety Risk Assessment of Construction Based on CiteSpace Software and WoS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Hua Zheng & Min Guo & Qian Wang & Qinghai Zhang & Noriko Akita, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Knowledge Structure and Research Progress Related to Urban Community Garden Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, January.
    14. Feng Yu & Lianqian Yin & Guizhou Wang, 2023. "A Worldwide Assessment of Quantitative Finance Research through Bibliometric Analysis," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Ileana Blanco & Luigi De Bellis & Andrea Luvisi, 2022. "Bibliometric Mapping of Research on Life Cycle Assessment of Olive Oil Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Chenghao Yang & Tongtong Liu, 2022. "Social Media Data in Urban Design and Landscape Research: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Nanaeva, Zhamal & Aysan, Ahmet Faruk, 2021. "Fintech As a Financial Disruptor: The Bibliometric Analysis," MPRA Paper 115535, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Wai Ming To & Andy W. L. Chung, 2023. "Carbon-Neutrality Research in China—Trends and Emerging Themes," World, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Ilaria Cataldo & Dora Novotny & Alessandro Carollo & Gianluca Esposito, 2023. "Mental Health in the Post-Lockdown Scenario: A Scientometric Investigation of the Main Thematic Trends of Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6040-:d:893346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.