IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p47-d708706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential of Forest Biomass Resources for Renewable Energy Production in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Dalibor Šafařík

    (Department of Forest and Wood Products Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Petra Hlaváčková

    (Department of Forest and Wood Products Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jakub Michal

    (Department of Forest and Wood Products Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In the European Green Deal and the Climate Act, the European Union has committed itself to achieving climate neutrality by 2050. This goal is to be achieved by joint efforts of all economic sectors, including forestry and its downstream sectors. One way to attain this goal is the effective and sustainable use of forest biomass for energy production. This article aims to quantify the potential of forest biomass resources for the production of electrical and thermal energy based on official departmental statistics, the current legal framework for forestry and the environment, and research results in the context of an extreme change in the raw material base due to the ongoing calamity caused by the spread of insect pests in the Czech Republic. This extreme can classify as a significant risk to the security of the energy supply from renewable sources in the event of oversizing new installed energy production from renewable sources. Based on data and calculations, an overall annual volume of dendromass available for energy production in the Czech Republic for the period extending to 2036 was quantified at the value of 13.473 million tons per year. Consequently, it is clear that the overall dendromass resources for energy production in the Czech Republic are not sufficient to achieve the EU’s ambitious objective.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalibor Šafařík & Petra Hlaváčková & Jakub Michal, 2021. "Potential of Forest Biomass Resources for Renewable Energy Production in the Czech Republic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:47-:d:708706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/47/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/47/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long, Huiling & Li, Xiaobing & Wang, Hong & Jia, Jingdun, 2013. "Biomass resources and their bioenergy potential estimation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 344-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhai, Jihua & Burke, Ian T. & Stewart, Douglas I., 2021. "Beneficial management of biomass combustion ashes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Mao, Guozhu & Zou, Hongyang & Chen, Guanyi & Du, Huibin & Zuo, Jian, 2015. "Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1823-1833.
    3. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    4. Johannes Full & Mathias Trauner & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2021. "Carbon-Negative Hydrogen Production (HyBECCS) from Organic Waste Materials in Germany: How to Estimate Bioenergy and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    6. Kang, Yating & Yang, Qing & Bartocci, Pietro & Wei, Hongjian & Liu, Sylvia Shuhan & Wu, Zhujuan & Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Haiping & Fantozzi, Francesco & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Żyromski, Andrzej & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Biniak-Pieróg, Małgorzata & Jakubowski, Wojciech, 2016. "The estimation of basket willow (Salix viminalis) yield – New approach. Part I: Background and statistical description," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1118-1126.
    8. Hugo Guzmán-Bello & Iosvani López-Díaz & Miguel Aybar-Mejía & Jose Atilio de Frias, 2022. "A Review of Trends in the Energy Use of Biomass: The Case of the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Yi-Kai Chih & Wei-Hsin Chen & Hwai Chyuan Ong & Pau Loke Show, 2019. "Product Characteristics of Torrefied Wood Sawdust in Normal and Vacuum Environments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Zhang, Xueyan & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Sun, Ningyue & Wang, Shengtian & Wang, Xiaohong & Jiang, Zijang, 2019. "High production of levulinic acid from cellulosic feedstocks being catalyzed by temperature-responsive transition metal substituted heteropolyacids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 802-813.
    11. Liu, Xuan & Burra, Kiran G. & Wang, Zhiwei & Li, Jinhu & Che, Defu & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2020. "On deconvolution for understanding synergistic effects in co-pyrolysis of pinewood and polypropylene," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    12. Ismail, Abdul Muhaimin & Ramirez-Iniguez, Roberto & Asif, Muhammad & Munir, Abu Bakar & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus, 2015. "Progress of solar photovoltaic in ASEAN countries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 399-412.
    13. Zuzana Smeets Kristkova & Edward Smeets & Hans van Meijl, 2016. "Agricultural R&D investments, biofuel policy and food security – a CGE analysis," EcoMod2016 9966, EcoMod.
    14. Akram, Fatima & Haq, Ikram ul & Aqeel, Amna & Ahmed, Zeeshan & Shah, Fatima Iftikhar, 2021. "Thermostable cellulases: Structure, catalytic mechanisms, directed evolution and industrial implementations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    15. Králík, T. & Knápek, J. & Vávrová, K. & Outrata, D. & Romportl, D. & Horák, M. & Jandera, J., 2023. "Ecosystem services and economic competitiveness of perennial energy crops in the modelling of biomass potential – A case study of the Czech Republic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Xin Zhang & Yun-Ze Li & Ao-Bing Wang & Li-Jun Gao & Hui-Juan Xu & Xian-Wen Ning, 2020. "The Development Strategies and Technology Roadmap of Bioenergy for a Typical Region: A Case Study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Richard Ahorsu & Francesc Medina & Magda Constantí, 2018. "Significance and Challenges of Biomass as a Suitable Feedstock for Bioenergy and Biochemical Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Fabián Almonacid, 2018. "Bioenergy in an Agroforestry Economy under Crisis: Complement and Conflict. La Araucanía, Chile, 1990–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Bergthorson, J.M. & Goroshin, S. & Soo, M.J. & Julien, P. & Palecka, J. & Frost, D.L. & Jarvis, D.J., 2015. "Direct combustion of recyclable metal fuels for zero-carbon heat and power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 368-382.
    20. Wang, Xingwei & Cai, Yanpeng & Dai, Chao, 2014. "Evaluating China's biomass power production investment based on a policy benefit real options model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 751-761.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:47-:d:708706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.