IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2486-d544285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of Water Depth in Ports Using Satellite Data Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Vanesa Mateo-Pérez

    (Project Engineering Department, University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Marina Corral-Bobadilla

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain)

  • Francisco Ortega-Fernández

    (Project Engineering Department, University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Vicente Rodríguez-Montequín

    (Project Engineering Department, University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain)

Abstract

One of the fundamental maintenance tasks of ports is the periodic dredging of them. This is necessary to guarantee a minimum draft that will enable ships to access ports safely. The determination of bathymetries is the instrument that determines the need for dredging and permits an analysis of the behavior of the port bottom over time, in order to achieve adequate water depth. Satellite data processing to predict environmental parameters is used increasingly. Based on satellite data and using different machine learning algorithm techniques, this study has sought to estimate the seabed in ports, taking into account the fact that the port areas are strongly anthropized areas. The algorithms that were used were Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and the Multi-Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS). The study was carried out in the ports of Candás and Luarca in the Principality of Asturias. In order to validate the results obtained, data was acquired in situ by using a single beam provided. The results show that this type of methodology can be used to estimate coastal bathymetry. However, when deciding which system was best, priority was given to simplicity and robustness. The results of the SVM and RF algorithms outperform those of the MARS. RF performs better in Candás with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.27 cm, whereas SVM performs better in Luarca with a mean absolute error of 0.37 cm. It is suggested that this approach is suitable as a simpler and more cost-effective rough resolution alternative, for estimating the depth of turbid water in ports, than single-beam sonar, which is labor-intensive and polluting.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanesa Mateo-Pérez & Marina Corral-Bobadilla & Francisco Ortega-Fernández & Vicente Rodríguez-Montequín, 2021. "Determination of Water Depth in Ports Using Satellite Data Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2486-:d:544285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2486/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peters, Jan & Baets, Bernard De & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Degroeve, Sven & Becker, Piet De & Huybrechts, Willy, 2007. "Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 304-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yikalo H. Araya & Tarmo K. Remmel & Ajith H. Perera, 2016. "What governs the presence of residual vegetation in boreal wildfires?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 159-181, April.
    2. Sarah Mittlefehldt & Erin Bunting & Emily Huff & Joseph Welsh & Robert Goodwin, 2021. "New Methods for Assessing Sustainability of Wood-Burning Energy Facilities: Combining Historical and Spatial Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Bemah Ibrahim & Isaac Ahenkorah & Anthony Ewusi, 2022. "Explainable Risk Assessment of Rockbolts’ Failure in Underground Coal Mines Based on Categorical Gradient Boosting and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Shuaiwei Shi & Meiyi Hou & Zifan Gu & Ce Jiang & Weiqiang Zhang & Mengyang Hou & Chenxi Li & Zenglei Xi, 2022. "Estimation of Heavy Metal Content in Soil Based on Machine Learning Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Yeeun Shin & Suyeon Kim & Se-Rin Park & Taewoo Yi & Chulgoo Kim & Sang-Woo Lee & Kyungjin An, 2022. "Identifying Key Environmental Factors for Paulownia coreana Habitats: Implementing National On-Site Survey and Machine Learning Algorithms," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Thomas J. Stohlgren & Peter Ma & Sunil Kumar & Monique Rocca & Jeffrey T. Morisette & Catherine S. Jarnevich & Nate Benson, 2010. "Ensemble Habitat Mapping of Invasive Plant Species," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 224-235, February.
    7. Musaab I. Magzoub & Raj Kiran & Saeed Salehi & Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein & Mustafa S. Nasser, 2021. "Assessing the Relation between Mud Components and Rheology for Loss Circulation Prevention Using Polymeric Gels: A Machine Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Marie-Hélène Roy & Denis Larocque, 2012. "Robustness of random forests for regression," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 993-1006, December.
    9. Sachin Kumar & T. Gopi & N. Harikeerthana & Munish Kumar Gupta & Vidit Gaur & Grzegorz M. Krolczyk & ChuanSong Wu, 2023. "Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 21-55, January.
    10. Seyed Naghibi & Hamid Pourghasemi, 2015. "A Comparative Assessment Between Three Machine Learning Models and Their Performance Comparison by Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Methods in Groundwater Potential Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 5217-5236, November.
    11. Dthenifer Cordeiro Santana & Regimar Garcia dos Santos & Pedro Henrique Neves da Silva & Hemerson Pistori & Larissa Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro & Nerison Luis Poersch & Gileno Brito de Azevedo & Glauce Ta, 2023. "Machine Learning Methods for Woody Volume Prediction in Eucalyptus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Saeid SHABANI, 2017. "Modelling and mapping of soil damage caused by harvesting in Caspian forests (Iran) using CART and RF data mining techniques," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 425-432.
    13. Jun-Mao Liao & Ming-Jui Chang & Luh-Maan Chang, 2020. "Prediction of Air-Conditioning Energy Consumption in R&D Building Using Multiple Machine Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Peters, Jan & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Van Meirvenne, Marc & Cockx, Liesbet & De Baets, Bernard, 2009. "Uncertainty propagation in vegetation distribution models based on ensemble classifiers," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(6), pages 791-804.
    15. Mehrdad Jeihouni & Ara Toomanian & Ali Mansourian, 2020. "Decision Tree-Based Data Mining and Rule Induction for Identifying High Quality Groundwater Zones to Water Supply Management: a Novel Hybrid Use of Data Mining and GIS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(1), pages 139-154, January.
    16. Li, Yi & Zou, Changfu & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Chan, Jonathan C.-W. & van den Bossche, Peter & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Omar, Noshin, 2018. "Random forest regression for online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 197-210.
    17. Jiacheng Niu & Huaizhi Tang & Qi Liu & Feng Cheng & Leina Zhang & Lingling Sang & Yuanfang Huang & Chongyang Shen & Bingbo Gao & Zibing Niu, 2022. "Determinants of Soil Bacterial Diversity in a Black Soil Region in a Large-Scale Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Shahin Nozari & Mohammad Reza Pahlavan-Rad & Colby Brungard & Brandon Heung & Luboš Borůvka, 2024. "Digital soil mapping using machine learning-based methods to predict soil organic carbon in two different districts in the Czech Republic," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 19(1), pages 32-49.
    19. repec:caa:jnlswr:v:preprint:id:119-2023-swr is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Shangkun Deng & Chenguang Wang & Zhe Fu & Mingyue Wang, 2021. "An Intelligent System for Insider Trading Identification in Chinese Security Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(2), pages 593-616, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2486-:d:544285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.