IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p578-d794230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Key Environmental Factors for Paulownia coreana Habitats: Implementing National On-Site Survey and Machine Learning Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Yeeun Shin

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

  • Suyeon Kim

    (Rural Environment & Resource Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Wanju-gun 55365, Korea)

  • Se-Rin Park

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

  • Taewoo Yi

    (National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon-gun 33657, Korea)

  • Chulgoo Kim

    (National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon-gun 33657, Korea)

  • Sang-Woo Lee

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

  • Kyungjin An

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

Abstract

Monitoring and preserving natural habitats has become an essential activity in many countries today. As a native tree species in Korea, Paulownia coreana has periodically been surveyed in national ecological surveys and was identified as an important target for conservation as well as habitat monitoring and management. This study explores habitat suitability models (HSMs) for Paulownia coreana in conjunction with national ecological survey data and various environmental factors. Together with environmental variables, the national ecological survey data were run through machine learning algorithms such as Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree & Rules, which were used to identify the impact of individual variables and create HSMs for Paulownia coreana , respectively. Unlike other studies, which used remote sensing data to create HSMs, this study employed periodical on-site survey data for enhanced validity. Moreover, localized environmental resources such as topography, soil, and rainfall were taken into account to project habitat suitability. Among the environment variables used, the study identified critical attributes that affect the habitat conditions of Paulownia coreana . Therefore, the habitat suitability modelling methods employed in this study could play key roles in planning, monitoring, and managing plants species in regional and national levels. Furthermore, it could shed light on existing challenges and future research needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeeun Shin & Suyeon Kim & Se-Rin Park & Taewoo Yi & Chulgoo Kim & Sang-Woo Lee & Kyungjin An, 2022. "Identifying Key Environmental Factors for Paulownia coreana Habitats: Implementing National On-Site Survey and Machine Learning Algorithms," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:578-:d:794230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/578/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/578/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradley, Bethany A. & Olsson, Aaryn D. & Wang, Ophelia & Dickson, Brett G. & Pelech, Lori & Sesnie, Steven E. & Zachmann, Luke J., 2012. "Species detection vs. habitat suitability: Are we biasing habitat suitability models with remotely sensed data?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 57-64.
    2. Zohmann, Margit & Pennerstorfer, Josef & Nopp-Mayr, Ursula, 2013. "Modelling habitat suitability for alpine rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta helvetica) combining object-based classification of IKONOS imagery and Habitat Suitability Index modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 22-32.
    3. Crisci, C. & Ghattas, B. & Perera, G., 2012. "A review of supervised machine learning algorithms and their applications to ecological data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 113-122.
    4. Peters, Jan & Baets, Bernard De & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Degroeve, Sven & Becker, Piet De & Huybrechts, Willy, 2007. "Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 304-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luís Silva & Luís Alcino Conceição & Fernando Cebola Lidon & Benvindo Maçãs, 2023. "Remote Monitoring of Crop Nitrogen Nutrition to Adjust Crop Models: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yikalo H. Araya & Tarmo K. Remmel & Ajith H. Perera, 2016. "What governs the presence of residual vegetation in boreal wildfires?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 159-181, April.
    2. Beáta Novotná & Ľuboš Jurík & Ján Čimo & Jozef Palkovič & Branislav Chvíla & Vladimír Kišš, 2022. "Machine Learning for Pan Evaporation Modeling in Different Agroclimatic Zones of the Slovak Republic (Macro-Regions)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Sarah Mittlefehldt & Erin Bunting & Emily Huff & Joseph Welsh & Robert Goodwin, 2021. "New Methods for Assessing Sustainability of Wood-Burning Energy Facilities: Combining Historical and Spatial Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Bemah Ibrahim & Isaac Ahenkorah & Anthony Ewusi, 2022. "Explainable Risk Assessment of Rockbolts’ Failure in Underground Coal Mines Based on Categorical Gradient Boosting and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Vanesa Mateo-Pérez & Marina Corral-Bobadilla & Francisco Ortega-Fernández & Vicente Rodríguez-Montequín, 2021. "Determination of Water Depth in Ports Using Satellite Data Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Hua Shi & George Xian & Roger Auch & Kevin Gallo & Qiang Zhou, 2021. "Urban Heat Island and Its Regional Impacts Using Remotely Sensed Thermal Data—A Review of Recent Developments and Methodology," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Shuang Zhang & Shaobo Liu & Qikang Zhong & Kai Zhu & Hongpeng Fu, 2024. "Assessing Eco-Environmental Effects and Its Impacts Mechanisms in the Mountainous City: Insights from Ecological–Production–Living Spaces Using Machine Learning Models in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Shen, Jian & Qin, Qubin & Wang, Ya & Sisson, Mac, 2019. "A data-driven modeling approach for simulating algal blooms in the tidal freshwater of James River in response to riverine nutrient loading," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 44-54.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0208400 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Alison Pereira Ribeiro & Nádia Felix Felipe da Silva & Fernanda Neiva Mesquita & Priscila de Cássia Souza Araújo & Thierson Couto Rosa & José Neiva Mesquita-Neto, 2021. "Machine learning approach for automatic recognition of tomato-pollinating bees based on their buzzing-sounds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Shuaiwei Shi & Meiyi Hou & Zifan Gu & Ce Jiang & Weiqiang Zhang & Mengyang Hou & Chenxi Li & Zenglei Xi, 2022. "Estimation of Heavy Metal Content in Soil Based on Machine Learning Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Olatunji, Obafemi O. & Akinlabi, Stephen & Madushele, Nkosinathi & Adedeji, Paul A., 2020. "Property-based biomass feedstock grading using k-Nearest Neighbour technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    13. Athina Ioannou & Mark Lycett & Alaa Marshan, 2024. "The Role of Mindfulness in Mitigating the Negative Consequences of Technostress," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 523-549, April.
    14. Pecchi, Matteo & Marchi, Maurizio & Burton, Vanessa & Giannetti, Francesca & Moriondo, Marco & Bernetti, Iacopo & Bindi, Marco & Chirici, Gherardo, 2019. "Species distribution modelling to support forest management. A literature review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    15. Brown, Christian H. & Griscom, Heather P., 2022. "Differentiating between distribution and suitable habitat in ecological niche models: A red spruce (Picea rubens) case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    16. Thomas J. Stohlgren & Peter Ma & Sunil Kumar & Monique Rocca & Jeffrey T. Morisette & Catherine S. Jarnevich & Nate Benson, 2010. "Ensemble Habitat Mapping of Invasive Plant Species," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 224-235, February.
    17. Musaab I. Magzoub & Raj Kiran & Saeed Salehi & Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein & Mustafa S. Nasser, 2021. "Assessing the Relation between Mud Components and Rheology for Loss Circulation Prevention Using Polymeric Gels: A Machine Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Marie-Hélène Roy & Denis Larocque, 2012. "Robustness of random forests for regression," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 993-1006, December.
    19. Zonlehoua Coulibali & Athyna Nancy Cambouris & Serge-Étienne Parent, 2020. "Site-specific machine learning predictive fertilization models for potato crops in Eastern Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, August.
    20. Sachin Kumar & T. Gopi & N. Harikeerthana & Munish Kumar Gupta & Vidit Gaur & Grzegorz M. Krolczyk & ChuanSong Wu, 2023. "Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 21-55, January.
    21. Seyed Naghibi & Hamid Pourghasemi, 2015. "A Comparative Assessment Between Three Machine Learning Models and Their Performance Comparison by Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Methods in Groundwater Potential Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 5217-5236, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:578-:d:794230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.