IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i6p1621-d517044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Exergy Analysis and Physical Optimum Method Regarding an Induction Furnace

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Marlene Wenzel

    (Institute of Energy Economics and Rational Energy Use (IER), University of Stuttgart, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Peter Radgen

    (Institute of Energy Economics and Rational Energy Use (IER), University of Stuttgart, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Jan Westermeyer

    (Cuno-Berufskolleg I, 58095 Hagen, Germany)

Abstract

In order to achieve energy and climate goals, energy and resource efficiency are considered a key measure. Limit-value-oriented methods such as the exergy analysis and the physical optimum method are used to show the limits of efficiency improvement. In this context, the physical optimum represents the theoretical ideal reference process. Despite their similarities, no comprehensive comparison to the exergy analysis has been carried out yet. Thus, the purpose of this study is to close this gap by examining differences and intersections using the example of an induction furnace. The minimum energy input according to the physical optimum method is 1327 MJ/t whereas the exergy of the melting product is 1393 MJ/t, depending on transit flows taken into account. The exergy analysis extends considerably beyond the physical optimum method in terms of the complexity and accuracy of the assessment of material flows by using exergy units. The exergy analysis makes clear which exergy is linked to the losses and thus reveals the potential for coupling processes. This results in different areas of application for the two methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Marlene Wenzel & Peter Radgen & Jan Westermeyer, 2021. "Comparing Exergy Analysis and Physical Optimum Method Regarding an Induction Furnace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1621-:d:517044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szargut, Jan, 1980. "International progress in second law analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(8), pages 709-718.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dirk Volta & Samanta A. Weber, 2021. "The Physical Optimum as an Ideal Reference Value for Balancing Thermodynamic Processes Integrating the Exergetic Evaluation by the Example of Heat Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Samanta A. Weber & Dirk Volta & Jürgen Kuck, 2022. "Comparison of the Energetic Efficiency of Gas Separation Technologies Using the Physical Optimum by the Example of Oxygen Supply Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Lukas Kerpen & Achim Schmidt & Bernd Sankol, 2021. "Differentiating the Physical Optimum from the Exergetic Evaluation of a Methane Combustion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bejan, Adrian, 2018. "Thermodynamics today," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1208-1219.
    2. Leites, I.L. & Sama, D.A. & Lior, N., 2003. "The theory and practice of energy saving in the chemical industry: some methods for reducing thermodynamic irreversibility in chemical technology processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 55-97.
    3. Silveira, Jose Luz & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Villela, Iraides Aparecida de Castro & Miro, Laura Siso, 2012. "Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2894-2906.
    4. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Hepbasli, Arif & Utlu, Zafer & Akdeniz, R. Cengiz, 2007. "Energetic and exergetic aspects of cotton stalk production in establishing energy policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 3015-3024, May.
    6. Rocco, M.V. & Colombo, E. & Sciubba, E., 2014. "Advances in exergy analysis: a novel assessment of the Extended Exergy Accounting method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1405-1420.
    7. An, Qier & An, Haizhong & Wang, Lang & Huang, Xuan, 2014. "Structural and regional variations of natural resource production in China based on exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 67-77.
    8. Macmanus Chinenye Ndukwu & Lyes Bennamoun & Merlin Simo-Tagne, 2021. "Reviewing the Exergy Analysis of Solar Thermal Systems Integrated with Phase Change Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Evanthia A. Nanaki & Christopher J. Koroneos, 2017. "Exergetic Aspects of Hydrogen Energy Systems—The Case Study of a Fuel Cell Bus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    10. van Donkelaar, Laura H.G. & Mostert, Joost & Zisopoulos, Filippos K. & Boom, Remko M. & van der Goot, Atze-Jan, 2016. "The use of enzymes for beer brewing: Thermodynamic comparison on resource use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 519-527.
    11. Jedrzej Bylka & Tomasz Mróz, 2020. "Exergy Evaluation of a Water Distribution System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Sharshir, S.W. & Elsheikh, A.H. & Peng, Guilong & Yang, Nuo & El-Samadony, M.O.A. & Kabeel, A.E., 2017. "Thermal performance and exergy analysis of solar stills – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 521-544.
    13. Kim, Donghoi & Gundersen, Truls, 2020. "Use of exergy efficiency for the optimization of LNG processes with NGL extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Petar Sabev Varbanov & Hon Huin Chin & Alexandra-Elena Plesu Popescu & Stanislav Boldyryev, 2020. "Thermodynamics-Based Process Sustainability Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Proenza Pérez, Nestor & Titosse Sadamitsu, Marlene & Luz Silveira, Jose & Santana Antunes, Julio & Eduardo Tuna, Celso & Erazo Valle, Atilio & Faria Silva, Natalia, 2015. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of a new compact trigeneration system run with liquefied petroleum gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1411-1419.
    16. Azoumah, Y. & Blin, J. & Daho, T., 2009. "Exergy efficiency applied for the performance optimization of a direct injection compression ignition (CI) engine using biofuels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1494-1500.
    17. Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Juhua & Xue, Zhengliang, 2017. "Exergy analyses of the oxygen blast furnace with top gas recycling process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 135-146.
    18. Bazooyar, Bahamin & Hosseini, Seyyed Yaghoob & Moradi Ghoje Begloo, Solat & Shariati, Ahmad & Hashemabadi, Seyed Hassan & Shaahmadi, Fariborz, 2018. "Mixed modified Fe2O3-WO3 as new fuel borne catalyst (FBC) for biodiesel fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 438-453.
    19. Bahman Najafi & Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Timon Rabczuk, 2018. "An Intelligent Artificial Neural Network-Response Surface Methodology Method for Accessing the Optimum Biodiesel and Diesel Fuel Blending Conditions in a Diesel Engine from the Viewpoint of Exergy and," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Mellino, Salvatore & Ripa, Maddalena & Zucaro, Amalia & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2014. "An emergy–GIS approach to the evaluation of renewable resource flows: A case study of Campania Region, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 103-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1621-:d:517044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.