IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i2p470-d481925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Operation Scheduling Considering Cycle Aging of Battery Energy Storage Systems on Stochastic Unit Commitments in Microgrids

Author

Listed:
  • Yong-Rae Lee

    (Department of Energy System Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 006974, Korea)

  • Hyung-Joon Kim

    (Department of Energy System Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 006974, Korea)

  • Mun-Kyeom Kim

    (Department of Energy System Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 006974, Korea)

Abstract

As renewable penetration increases in microgrids (MGs), the use of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) has become indispensable for optimal MG operation. Although BESSs are advantageous for economic and stable MG operation, their life degradation should be considered for maximizing cost savings. This paper proposes an optimal BESS scheduling for MGs to solve the stochastic unit commitment problem, considering the uncertainties in renewables and load. Through the proposed BESS scheduling, the life degradation of BESSs is minimized, and MG operation becomes economically feasible. To address the aforementioned uncertainties, a scenario-based method was applied using Monte Carlo simulation and the K-means clustering algorithm for scenario generation and reduction, respectively. By implementing the rainflow-counting algorithm, the BESS charge/discharge state profile was obtained. To formulate the cycle aging stress function and examine the life cycle cost (LCC) of a BESS more realistically, the nonlinear cycle aging stress function was partially linearized. Benders decomposition was adopted for minimizing the BESS cycle aging, total operating cost, and LCC. To this end, the general problem was divided into a master problem and subproblems to consider uncertainties and optimize the BESS charging/discharging scheduling problem via parallel processing. To demonstrate the effectiveness and benefits of the proposed BESS optimal scheduling in MG operation, different case studies were analyzed. The simulation results confirmed the superiority and improved performance of the proposed scheduling.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong-Rae Lee & Hyung-Joon Kim & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2021. "Optimal Operation Scheduling Considering Cycle Aging of Battery Energy Storage Systems on Stochastic Unit Commitments in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:470-:d:481925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yohwan Choi & Hongseok Kim, 2016. "Optimal Scheduling of Energy Storage System for Self-Sustainable Base Station Operation Considering Battery Wear-Out Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Soshinskaya, Mariya & Crijns-Graus, Wina H.J. & Guerrero, Josep M. & Vasquez, Juan C., 2014. "Microgrids: Experiences, barriers and success factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 659-672.
    3. Kim, H.Y. & Kim, M.K., 2017. "Optimal generation rescheduling for meshed AC/HIS grids with multi-terminal voltage source converter high voltage direct current and battery energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 309-321.
    4. Alvarado-Barrios, Lázaro & Rodríguez del Nozal, Álvaro & Boza Valerino, Juan & García Vera, Ignacio & Martínez-Ramos, Jose L., 2020. "Stochastic unit commitment in microgrids: Influence of the load forecasting error and the availability of energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2060-2069.
    5. Vatanpour, Mohsen & Sadeghi Yazdankhah, Ahmad, 2018. "The impact of energy storage modeling in coordination with wind farm and thermal units on security and reliability in a stochastic unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 476-490.
    6. Kyu-Hyung Jo & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2018. "Stochastic Unit Commitment Based on Multi-Scenario Tree Method Considering Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Uddin, Moslem & Romlie, M.F. & Abdullah, M.F. & Tan, ChiaKwang & Shafiullah, GM & Bakar, A.H.A., 2020. "A novel peak shaving algorithm for islanded microgrid using battery energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Ho-Sung Ryu & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2020. "Two-Stage Optimal Microgrid Operation with a Risk-Based Hybrid Demand Response Program Considering Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    9. Rae-Kyun Kim & Mark B. Glick & Keith R. Olson & Yun-Su Kim, 2020. "MILP-PSO Combined Optimization Algorithm for an Islanded Microgrid Scheduling with Detailed Battery ESS Efficiency Model and Policy Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong-Rae Lee & Hyung-Joon Kim & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2022. "Correction: Lee et al. Optimal Operation Scheduling Considering Cycle Aging of Battery Energy Storage Systems on Stochastic Unit Commitments in Microgrids. Energies 2021, 14 , 470," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-2, March.
    2. Wonpoong Lee & Myeongseok Chae & Dongjun Won, 2022. "Optimal Scheduling of Energy Storage System Considering Life-Cycle Degradation Cost Using Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manzano, J.M. & Salvador, J.R. & Romaine, J.B. & Alvarado-Barrios, L., 2022. "Economic predictive control for isolated microgrids based on real world demand/renewable energy data and forecast errors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 647-658.
    2. L. Alvarado-Barrios & A. Rodríguez del Nozal & A. Tapia & J. L. Martínez-Ramos & D. G. Reina, 2019. "An Evolutionary Computational Approach for the Problem of Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch in Microgrids under Several Operation Modes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Harsh, Pratik & Das, Debapriya, 2022. "Optimal coordination strategy of demand response and electric vehicle aggregators for the energy management of reconfigured grid-connected microgrid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Kim, Minsoo & Park, Taeseop & Jeong, Jaeik & Kim, Hongseok, 2023. "Stochastic optimization of home energy management system using clustered quantile scenario reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    5. Jungsub Sim & Minsoo Kim & Dongjoo Kim & Hongseok Kim, 2021. "Cloud Energy Storage System Operation with Capacity P2P Transaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Bui, Duong Minh & Chen, Shi-Lin & Lien, Keng-Yu & Chang, Yung-Ruei & Lee, Yih-Der & Jiang, Jheng-Lun, 2017. "Investigation on transient behaviours of a uni-grounded low-voltage AC microgrid and evaluation on its available fault protection methods: Review and proposals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1417-1452.
    7. Kirchhoff, Hannes & Strunz, Kai, 2019. "Key drivers for successful development of peer-to-peer microgrids for swarm electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 46-62.
    8. Quynh T.T Tran & Eleonora Riva Sanseverino & Gaetano Zizzo & Maria Luisa Di Silvestre & Tung Lam Nguyen & Quoc-Tuan Tran, 2020. "Real-Time Minimization Power Losses by Driven Primary Regulation in Islanded Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Woan-Ho Park & Hamza Abunima & Mark B. Glick & Yun-Su Kim, 2021. "Energy Curtailment Scheduling MILP Formulation for an Islanded Microgrid with High Penetration of Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Younes Zahraoui & Ibrahim Alhamrouni & Saad Mekhilef & M. Reyasudin Basir Khan & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Alex Stojcevski & Ben Horan, 2021. "Energy Management System in Microgrids: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-33, September.
    11. Dong, Jizhe & Han, Shunjie & Shao, Xiangxin & Tang, Like & Chen, Renhui & Wu, Longfei & Zheng, Cunlong & Li, Zonghao & Li, Haolin, 2021. "Day-ahead wind-thermal unit commitment considering historical virtual wind power data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Feng, Wenxiu & Ruiz Mora, Carlos, 2023. "Risk Management of Energy Communities with Hydrogen Production and Storage Technologies," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 36274, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    13. Taylan G. Topcu & Konstantinos Triantis, 2022. "An ex-ante DEA method for representing contextual uncertainties and stakeholder risk preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 395-423, February.
    14. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhao, Shihao & Yang, Zhile & Zhang, Ning & Xu, Xinzhi, 2022. "A parallel meta-heuristic method for solving large scale unit commitment considering the integration of new energy sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    15. Sarah Hafner & Olivia James & Aled Jones, 2019. "A Scoping Review of Barriers to Investment in Climate Change Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Liu, Yixin & Guo, Li & Wang, Chengshan, 2018. "A robust operation-based scheduling optimization for smart distribution networks with multi-microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 130-140.
    17. Alvarado-Barrios, Lázaro & Rodríguez del Nozal, Álvaro & Boza Valerino, Juan & García Vera, Ignacio & Martínez-Ramos, Jose L., 2020. "Stochastic unit commitment in microgrids: Influence of the load forecasting error and the availability of energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2060-2069.
    18. Burgos-Mellado, Claudio & Orchard, Marcos E. & Kazerani, Mehrdad & Cárdenas, Roberto & Sáez, Doris, 2016. "Particle-filtering-based estimation of maximum available power state in Lithium-Ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 349-363.
    19. Mansourshoar, Paria & Yazdankhah, Ahmad Sadeghi & Vatanpour, Mohsen & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2022. "Impact of implementing a price-based demand response program on the system reliability in security-constrained unit commitment problem coupled with wind farms in the presence of contingencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    20. Jiang, Sufan & Wu, Chuanshen & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Liu, Yu & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Sicheng, 2022. "Robust frequency risk-constrained unit commitment model for AC-DC system considering wind uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 395-406.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:470-:d:481925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.