IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i2p413-d479715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Surrogate Estimation with Spatial Features Using a Deep Convolutional Autoencoder for CO 2 Geological Sequestration

Author

Listed:
  • Suryeom Jo

    (Geo-ICT Convergence Research Team, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, Korea)

  • Changhyup Park

    (Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea)

  • Dong-Woo Ryu

    (Geo-ICT Convergence Research Team, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, Korea)

  • Seongin Ahn

    (Geo-ICT Convergence Research Team, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, Korea)

Abstract

This paper develops a reliable deep-learning framework to extract latent features from spatial properties and investigates adaptive surrogate estimation to sequester CO 2 into heterogeneous deep saline aquifers. Our deep-learning architecture includes a deep convolutional autoencoder (DCAE) and a fully-convolutional network to not only reduce computational costs but also to extract dimensionality-reduced features to conserve spatial characteristics. The workflow integrates two different spatial properties within a single convolutional system, and it also achieves accurate reconstruction performance. This approach significantly reduces the number of parameters to 4.3% of the original number required, e.g., the number of three-dimensional spatial properties needed decreases from 44,460 to 1920. The successful dimensionality reduction is accomplished by the DCAE system regarding all inputs as image channels from the initial stage of learning using the fully-convolutional network instead of fully-connected layers. The DCAE reconstructs spatial parameters such as permeability and porosity while conserving their statistical values, i.e., their mean and standard deviation, achieving R-squared values of over 0.972 with a mean absolute percentage error of their mean values of less than 1.79%. The adaptive surrogate model using the latent features extracted by DCAE, well operations, and modeling parameters is able to accurately estimate CO 2 sequestration performances. The model shows R-squared values of over 0.892 for testing data not used in training and validation. The DCAE-based surrogate estimation exploits the reliable integration of various spatial data within the fully-convolutional network and allows us to evaluate flow behavior occurring in a subsurface domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Suryeom Jo & Changhyup Park & Dong-Woo Ryu & Seongin Ahn, 2021. "Adaptive Surrogate Estimation with Spatial Features Using a Deep Convolutional Autoencoder for CO 2 Geological Sequestration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:413-:d:479715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyndman, Rob J. & Koehler, Anne B., 2006. "Another look at measures of forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 679-688.
    2. Yongho Seong & Changhyup Park & Jinho Choi & Ilsik Jang, 2020. "Surrogate Model with a Deep Neural Network to Evaluate Gas–Liquid Flow in a Horizontal Pipe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Seil Ki & Ilsik Jang & Booho Cha & Jeonggyu Seo & Oukwang Kwon, 2020. "Restoration of Missing Pressures in a Gas Well Using Recurrent Neural Networks with Long Short-Term Memory Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Turgay Ertekin & Qian Sun, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence Applications in Reservoir Engineering: A Status Check," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:id:572 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chang, Andrew C. & Hanson, Tyler J., 2016. "The accuracy of forecasts prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 23-43.
    3. Frank, Johannes, 2023. "Forecasting realized volatility in turbulent times using temporal fusion transformers," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 03/2023, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    4. Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Petropoulos, Fotios & Trapero, Juan R., 2014. "Improving forecasting by estimating time series structural components across multiple frequencies," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 291-302.
    5. Paulo Júlio & Pedro M. Esperança, 2012. "Evaluating the forecast quality of GDP components: An application to G7," GEE Papers 0047, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Apr 2012.
    6. Cameron Roach & Rob Hyndman & Souhaib Ben Taieb, 2021. "Non‐linear mixed‐effects models for time series forecasting of smart meter demand," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(6), pages 1118-1130, September.
    7. Alysha M De Livera, 2010. "Automatic forecasting with a modified exponential smoothing state space framework," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 10/10, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    8. Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Thomas, Alice Carole & Wang, Jianxin, 2023. "The economic impact of daily volatility persistence on energy markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    9. I. Yu. Zolotova & V. V. Dvorkin, 2017. "Short-term forecasting of prices for the Russian wholesale electricity market based on neural networks," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 608-615, November.
    10. Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Müller, Karsten, 2019. "Has macroeconomic forecasting changed after the Great Recession? Panel-based evidence on forecast accuracy and forecaster behavior from Germany," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Blaskowitz, Oliver & Herwartz, Helmut, 2011. "On economic evaluation of directional forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1058-1065, October.
    12. Thiyanga S. Talagala & Feng Li & Yanfei Kang, 2019. "Feature-based Forecast-Model Performance Prediction," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 21/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    13. Martin Guth, 2022. "Predicting Default Probabilities for Stress Tests: A Comparison of Models," Papers 2202.03110, arXiv.org.
    14. Santamaría-Bonfil, G. & Reyes-Ballesteros, A. & Gershenson, C., 2016. "Wind speed forecasting for wind farms: A method based on support vector regression," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 790-809.
    15. Meira, Erick & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2022. "Forecasting natural gas consumption using Bagging and modified regularization techniques," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Wasilewski, J. & Baczynski, D., 2017. "Short-term electric energy production forecasting at wind power plants in pareto-optimality context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 177-187.
    17. Huber, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner, 2020. "Daily retail demand forecasting using machine learning with emphasis on calendric special days," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1420-1438.
    18. Goldsworthy, M. & Moore, T. & Peristy, M. & Grimeland, M., 2022. "Cloud-based model-predictive-control of a battery storage system at a commercial site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    19. Bialowolski, Piotr & Kuszewski, Tomasz & Witkowski, Bartosz, 2015. "Bayesian averaging vs. dynamic factor models for forecasting economic aggregates with tendency survey data," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 9, pages 1-37.
    20. Kunze, Frederik, 2017. "Predicting exchange rates in Asia: New insights on the accuracy of survey forecasts," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 326, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    21. Drachal, Krzysztof, 2021. "Forecasting crude oil real prices with averaging time-varying VAR models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:413-:d:479715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.