IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5904-d637726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scale Tests to Estimate Penetration Force and Stress State of the Silica Sand in Windfarm Foundations

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Soriano Vicedo

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Javier García Barba

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Jorge Luengo Frades

    (Escuela Tecnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Vicente Negro Valdecantos

    (Escuela Tecnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The analysis of the soil behavior when the pile is driving into the seabed in offshore wind platforms is one of the major problems associated with this new form of clean energy generation. At present, there are no scaled studies carried out analyzing the mechanical and deformational behavior of both the material of the pile supporting the engine (large steel hollow piles with a diameter of 8 m and a thickness of 15–20 cm) and the soil where the pile is driven. Usually, these elements are installed on sands with a very small grain size displaced from the limits of dry–wet beach (water limit) toward the offshore limits, which prevents them from returning to their previous location in a natural way. This paper presents results obtained from scale tests in a steel pool to analyze the behavior of the sand where the piles were installed. First, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test was carried out to estimate the soil behavior in similar conditions to the steel pool. The scale tests consisted of the penetration of the steel tube into the sand using a hydraulic press. The objective was to compare the results for three tubes with different diameters, three different speeds, and two kinds of ending on the extreme of the tested element.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Soriano Vicedo & Javier García Barba & Jorge Luengo Frades & Vicente Negro Valdecantos, 2021. "Scale Tests to Estimate Penetration Force and Stress State of the Silica Sand in Windfarm Foundations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5904-:d:637726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luengo, Jorge & Negro, Vicente & García-Barba, Javier & López-Gutiérrez, José-Santos & Esteban, M. Dolores, 2019. "New detected uncertainties in the design of foundations for offshore Wind Turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 667-677.
    2. Esteban, M. Dolores & Diez, J. Javier & López, Jose S. & Negro, Vicente, 2011. "Why offshore wind energy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 444-450.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Soriano Vicedo & Javier García Barba & William Daniel Cobelo & Aldo Fernández, 2023. "Modeling and Pile-Driven Scaled Tests for Windfarm Foundations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Luengo Frades & Vicente Negro & Javier García Barba & Mario Martín-Antón & José Santos López-Gutiérrez & M. Dolores Esteban & Luis J. Moreno Blasco, 2019. "Preliminary Design for Wave Run-Up in Offshore Wind Farms: Comparison between Theoretical Models and Physical Model Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    3. Adedipe, Oyewole & Brennan, Feargal & Kolios, Athanasios, 2016. "Review of corrosion fatigue in offshore structures: Present status and challenges in the offshore wind sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-154.
    4. Astariz, S. & Iglesias, G., 2016. "Output power smoothing and reduced downtime period by combined wind and wave energy farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 69-81.
    5. Luengo, Jorge & Negro, Vicente & García-Barba, Javier & López-Gutiérrez, José-Santos & Esteban, M. Dolores, 2019. "New detected uncertainties in the design of foundations for offshore Wind Turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 667-677.
    6. Jorge Soriano Vicedo & Javier García Barba & William Daniel Cobelo & Aldo Fernández, 2023. "Modeling and Pile-Driven Scaled Tests for Windfarm Foundations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    8. Yang, J.J. & He, E.M., 2020. "Coupled modeling and structural vibration control for floating offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 678-694.
    9. Farboud Khatami & Erfan Goharian, 2022. "Beyond Profitable Shifts to Green Energies, towards Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Vinel, Alexander & Mortaz, Ebrahim, 2019. "Optimal pooling of renewable energy sources with a risk-averse approach: Implications for US energy portfolio," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 928-939.
    11. Stefan Ćetković & Aron Buzogány & Miranda Schreurs, 2016. "Varieties of clean energy transitions in Europe: Political-economic foundations of onshore and offshore wind development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-18, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Halliday, J. Ross & Dorrell, David G. & Wood, Alan R., 2011. "An application of the Fast Fourier Transform to the short-term prediction of sea wave behaviour," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1685-1692.
    13. Asad Rehman & Mohsin Ali Koondhar & Zafar Ali & Munawar Jamali & Ragab A. El-Sehiemy, 2023. "Critical Issues of Optimal Reactive Power Compensation Based on an HVAC Transmission System for an Offshore Wind Farm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. César Henrique Mattos Pires & Felipe M. Pimenta & Carla A. D'Aquino & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Xuerui Mao & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2020. "Coastal Wind Power in Southern Santa Catarina, Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Ying Gong & Zhengbao Yang & Xiaobiao Shan & Yubiao Sun & Tao Xie & Yunlong Zi, 2019. "Capturing Flow Energy from Ocean and Wind," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Tosatto, Andrea & Beseler, Xavier Martínez & Østergaard, Jacob & Pinson, Pierre & Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros, 2022. "North Sea Energy Islands: Impact on national markets and grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Kamila Pronińska & Krzysztof Księżopolski, 2021. "Baltic Offshore Wind Energy Development—Poland’s Public Policy Tools Analysis and the Geostrategic Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Hammar, Linus & Wikström, Andreas & Molander, Sverker, 2014. "Assessing ecological risks of offshore wind power on Kattegat cod," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 414-424.
    19. Zountouridou, E.I. & Kiokes, G.C. & Chakalis, S. & Georgilakis, P.S. & Hatziargyriou, N.D., 2015. "Offshore floating wind parks in the deep waters of Mediterranean Sea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 433-448.
    20. Al-Nassar, W.K. & Neelamani, S. & Al-Salem, K.A. & Al-Dashti, H.A., 2019. "Feasibility of offshore wind energy as an alternative source for the state of Kuwait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 783-796.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5904-:d:637726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.