IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i11p3351-d570607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customized yet Standardized Temperature Derivatives: A Non-Parametric Approach with Suitable Basis Selection for Ensuring Robustness

Author

Listed:
  • Takuji Matsumoto

    (Socio-Economic Research Center, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Tokyo 100-8126, Japan)

  • Yuji Yamada

    (Faculty of Business Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tokyo 112-0012, Japan)

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that non-parametric hedging models using temperature derivatives are highly effective in hedging profit/loss fluctuation risks for electric utilities. Aiming for the practical applications of these methods, this study performs extensive empirical analyses and makes methodological customizations. First, we consider three types of electric utilities being exposed to risks of “demand”, “price”, and their “product (multiplication)”, and examine the design of an appropriate derivative for each utility. Our empirical results show that non-parametrically priced derivatives can maximize the hedge effect when a hedger bears a “price risk” with high nonlinearity to temperature. In contrast, standard derivatives are more useful for utilities with only “demand risk” in having a comparable hedge effect and in being liquidly traded. In addition, the squared prediction error derivative on temperature has a significant hedge effect on both price and product risks as well as a certain effect on demand risk, which illustrates its potential as a new standard derivative. Furthermore, spline basis selection, which may be overlooked by modeling practitioners, improves hedge effects significantly, especially when the model has strong nonlinearities. Surprisingly, the hedge effect of temperature derivatives in previous studies is improved by 13–53% by using an appropriate new basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Takuji Matsumoto & Yuji Yamada, 2021. "Customized yet Standardized Temperature Derivatives: A Non-Parametric Approach with Suitable Basis Selection for Ensuring Robustness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3351-:d:570607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eckhard Platen & Jason West, 2004. "A Fair Pricing Approach to Weather Derivatives," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 11(1), pages 23-53, March.
    2. Bhattacharya, Saptarshi & Gupta, Aparna & Kar, Koushik & Owusu, Abena, 2020. "Risk management of renewable power producers from co-dependencies in cash flows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1081-1093.
    3. Lee, Yongheon & Oren, Shmuel S., 2009. "An equilibrium pricing model for weather derivatives in a multi-commodity setting," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 702-713, September.
    4. Matsumoto, Takuji & Yamada, Yuji, 2021. "Simultaneous hedging strategy for price and volume risks in electricity businesses using energy and weather derivatives1," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. M. Davis, 2001. "Pricing weather derivatives by marginal value," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 305-308, March.
    6. Patrick L. Brockett & Mulong Wang & Chuanhou Yang & Hong Zou, 2006. "Portfolio Effects and Valuation of Weather Derivatives," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 41(1), pages 55-76, February.
    7. James McCulloch and Katja Ignatieva, 2020. "Intra-day Electricity Demand and Temperature," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 161-182.
    8. Simon N. Wood, 2003. "Thin plate regression splines," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 95-114, February.
    9. Kanamura, Takashi & Ohashi, Kazuhiko, 2009. "Pricing summer day options by good-deal bounds," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 289-297, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takuji Matsumoto & Yuji Yamada, 2021. "Comprehensive and Comparative Analysis of GAM-Based PV Power Forecasting Models Using Multidimensional Tensor Product Splines against Machine Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Yuji Yamada & Takuji Matsumoto, 2021. "Going for Derivatives or Forwards? Minimizing Cashflow Fluctuations of Electricity Transactions on Power Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, November.
    3. Yuji Yamada & Takuji Matsumoto, 2023. "Construction of Mixed Derivatives Strategy for Wind Power Producers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Shinji Kuno & Kenji Tanaka & Yuji Yamada, 2022. "Effectiveness and Feasibility of Market Makers for P2P Electricity Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Takuji Matsumoto & Yuji Yamada, 2023. "Improving the Efficiency of Hedge Trading Using Higher-Order Standardized Weather Derivatives for Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuji Yamada & Takuji Matsumoto, 2021. "Going for Derivatives or Forwards? Minimizing Cashflow Fluctuations of Electricity Transactions on Power Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Kanamura, Takashi & Homann, Lasse & Prokopczuk, Marcel, 2021. "Pricing analysis of wind power derivatives for renewable energy risk management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    3. Kanamura, Takashi, 2019. "Volumetric Risk Hedging Strategies and Basis Risk Premium for Solar Power," MPRA Paper 92009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Matsumoto, Takuji & Yamada, Yuji, 2021. "Simultaneous hedging strategy for price and volume risks in electricity businesses using energy and weather derivatives1," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Shinji Kuno & Kenji Tanaka & Yuji Yamada, 2022. "Effectiveness and Feasibility of Market Makers for P2P Electricity Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Rui Zhou & Johnny Siu-Hang Li & Jeffrey Pai, 2019. "Pricing temperature derivatives with a filtered historical simulation approach," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(15), pages 1462-1484, October.
    7. Patrick Brockett & Linda Goldens & Min-Ming Wen & Charles Yang, 2009. "Pricing Weather Derivatives Using the Indifference Pricing Approach," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 303-315.
    8. Eirini Konstantinidi & Gkaren Papazian & George Skiadopoulos, 2015. "Modeling the Dynamics of Temperature with a View to Weather Derivatives," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Anastasios G Malliaris & William T Ziemba (ed.), THE WORLD SCIENTIFIC HANDBOOK OF FUTURES MARKETS, chapter 17, pages 511-544, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Yeny E. Rodríguez & Miguel A. Pérez-Uribe & Javier Contreras, 2021. "Wind Put Barrier Options Pricing Based on the Nordix Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Bertrand, Jean-Louis & Brusset, Xavier & Fortin, Maxime, 2015. "Assessing and hedging the cost of unseasonal weather: Case of the apparel sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 261-276.
    11. Yuji Yamada, 2008. "Optimal Hedging of Prediction Errors Using Prediction Errors," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 15(1), pages 67-95, March.
    12. Fred Espen Benth & Anca Pircalabu, 2018. "A non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model for pricing wind power futures," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 36-65, January.
    13. Andrea Barth & Fred Espen Benth & Jurgen Potthoff, 2011. "Hedging of Spatial Temperature Risk with Market-Traded Futures," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 93-117.
    14. Svec, J. & Stevenson, M., 2007. "Modelling and forecasting temperature based weather derivatives," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 185-204.
    15. Adam Clements & A S Hurn & K A Lindsay, 2008. "Developing analytical distributions for temperature indices for the purposes of pricing temperature-based weather derivatives," NCER Working Paper Series 34, National Centre for Econometric Research.
    16. Wolfgang Karl Hardle and Maria Osipenko, 2012. "Spatial Risk Premium on Weather Derivatives and Hedging Weather Exposure in Electricity," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    17. Xu, Wei & Odening, Martin & Musshoff, Oliver, 2007. "Indifference Pricing of Weather Insurance," 101st Seminar, July 5-6, 2007, Berlin Germany 9267, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Traian A. Pirvu & Huayue Zhang, 2012. "A Multi Period Equilibrium Pricing Model," Papers 1205.6193, arXiv.org.
    19. Fred Espen Benth & Jūratė Šaltytė Benth & Steen Koekebakker, 2008. "Stochastic Modeling of Electricity and Related Markets," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6811, January.
    20. Fred Espen Benth & Jūratė Šaltytė Benth & Steen Koekebakker, 2007. "Putting a Price on Temperature," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 746-767, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3351-:d:570607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.