IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i11p3135-d563734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Software Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems in the Traffic Environment of Vissim

Author

Listed:
  • Demin Nalic

    (Institute of Automotive Engineering, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Aleksa Pandurevic

    (Institute of Automotive Engineering, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Arno Eichberger

    (Institute of Automotive Engineering, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Martin Fellendorf

    (Institute of Highway Engineering and Transport Planning, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Branko Rogic

    (MAGNA Steyr Fahrzeugtechnik AG Co. & KG, 8045 Graz, Austria)

Abstract

As the complexity of automated driving systemss (ADSs) with automation levels above level 3 is rising, virtual testing for such systems is inevitable and necessary. The complexity of testing these levels lies in the modeling and calculation demands for the virtual environment, which consists of roads, traffic, static and dynamic objects, as well as the modeling of the car itself. An essential part of the safety and performance analysis of ADSs is the modeling and consideration of dynamic road traffic participants. There are multiple forms of traffic flow simulation software (TFSS), which are used to reproduce realistic traffic behavior and are integrated directly or over interfaces with vehicle simulation software environments. In this paper we focus on the TFSS from PTV Vissim in a co-simulation framework which combines Vissim and CarMaker. As it is a commonly used software in industry and research, it also provides complex driver models and interfaces to manipulate and develop customized traffic participants. Using the driver model DLL interface (DMDI) from Vissim it is possible to manipulate traffic participants or adjust driver models in a defined manner. Based on the DMDI, we extended the code and developed a framework for the manipulation and testing of ADSs in the traffic environment of Vissim. The efficiency and performance of the developed software framework are evaluated using the co-simulation framework for the testing of ADSs, which is based on Vissim and CarMaker.

Suggested Citation

  • Demin Nalic & Aleksa Pandurevic & Arno Eichberger & Martin Fellendorf & Branko Rogic, 2021. "Software Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems in the Traffic Environment of Vissim," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-9, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3135-:d:563734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Demin Nalic & Aleksa Pandurevic & Arno Eichberger & Branko Rogic, 2020. "Design and Implementation of a Co-Simulation Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Martin Fellendorf & Peter Vortisch, 2010. "Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Jaume Barceló (ed.), Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, chapter 0, pages 63-93, Springer.
    3. Shuo Feng & Xintao Yan & Haowei Sun & Yiheng Feng & Henry X. Liu, 2021. "Intelligent driving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Kalra, Nidhi & Paddock, Susan M., 2016. "Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 182-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2023. "Vehicle Emission Models and Traffic Simulators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, May.
    2. Couraud, Benoit & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Norbu, Sonam & Chen, Si & Flynn, David, 2023. "Responsive FLEXibility: A smart local energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Arno Eichberger & Zsolt Szalay & Martin Fellendorf & Henry Liu, 2022. "Advances in Automated Driving Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-5, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Cheng & Hui, Fei & Khattak, Asad J. & Zhao, Xiangmo & Jin, Shaojie, 2023. "Batch human-like trajectory generation for multi-motion-state NPC-vehicles in autonomous driving virtual simulation testing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 616(C).
    2. Demin Nalic & Aleksa Pandurevic & Arno Eichberger & Branko Rogic, 2020. "Design and Implementation of a Co-Simulation Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Andrea Bertolini & Massimo Riccaboni, 2021. "Grounding the case for a European approach to the regulation of automated driving: the technology-selection effect of liability rules," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 243-284, April.
    4. Zoltan Ferenc Magosi & Christoph Wellershaus & Viktor Roland Tihanyi & Patrick Luley & Arno Eichberger, 2022. "Evaluation Methodology for Physical Radar Perception Sensor Models Based on On-Road Measurements for the Testing and Validation of Automated Driving," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Hudson, John & Orviska, Marta & Hunady, Jan, 2019. "People’s attitudes to autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 164-176.
    6. Liu, Peng & Zhang, Yawen & He, Zhen, 2019. "The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 341-347.
    7. Cian Ryan & Finbarr Murphy & Martin Mullins, 2019. "Semiautonomous Vehicle Risk Analysis: A Telematics‐Based Anomaly Detection Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1125-1140, May.
    8. Hazel Si Min Lim & Araz Taeihagh, 2019. "Algorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    9. Xavier Boulet & Mahdi Zargayouna & Gérard Scemama & Fabien Leurent, 2021. "A Middleware-Based Approach for Multi-Scale Mobility Simulation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Talebian, Ahmadreza & Mishra, Sabyasachee, 2022. "Unfolding the state of the adoption of connected autonomous trucks by the commercial fleet owner industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Scott Le Vine & You Kong & Xiaobo Liu & John Polak, 2019. "Vehicle automation and freeway ‘pipeline’ capacity in the context of legal standards of care," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1215-1244, August.
    12. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 0. "Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    13. Makoto Fujiu & Yuma Morisaki & Jyunich Takayama, 2024. "Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic Flow in Rural and Urban Areas Using a Traffic Flow Simulator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Huiyuan Xiong & Huan Liu & Jian Ma & Yuelong Pan & Ronghui Zhang, 2021. "An NN-Based Double Parallel Longitudinal and Lateral Driving Strategy for Self-Driving Transport Vehicles in Structured Road Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Du, Manqing & Zhang, Tingru & Liu, Jinting & Xu, Zhigang & Liu, Peng, 2022. "Rumors in the air? Exploring public misconceptions about automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 237-252.
    16. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Dake, Dana & Decaminada, Travis & Kotval-K, Zeenat & Qu, Teresa & Wilson, Mark & Pentland, Brian, 2020. "Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-335.
    17. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 2020. "Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1227-1249, December.
    18. Piotr Gołębiowski & Jolanta Żak & Ilona Jacyna-Gołda, 2020. "Approach to the Proecological Distribution of the Traffic Flow on the Transport Network from the Point of View of Carbon Dioxide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Hussain, Qinaat & Alhajyaseen, Wael K.M. & Adnan, Muhammad & Almallah, Mustafa & Almukdad, Abdulkarim & Alqaradawi, Mohammed, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles between anticipation and apprehension: Investigations through safety and security perceptions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 440-451.
    20. Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2023. "Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3135-:d:563734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.