IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i11p3016-d560516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and Biomass Properties of Poplar Clones Managed in Short-Rotation Culture as a Potential Fuelwood Source in Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Marzena Niemczyk

    (Department of Silviculture and Forest Tree Genetics, Forest Research Institute, Braci Leśnej 3, Sękocin Stary, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Margalita Bachilava

    (Kakha Bendukidze Campus, Vasil Gulisashvili Forest Institute of Agricultural University of Georgia, 240 David Aghmashenebeli Alley, Tbilisi 0131, Georgia)

  • Marek Wróbel

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Agrophysics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 120, 30-149 Kraków, Poland)

  • Marcin Jewiarz

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Agrophysics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 120, 30-149 Kraków, Poland)

  • Giorgi Kavtaradze

    (Kakha Bendukidze Campus, Vasil Gulisashvili Forest Institute of Agricultural University of Georgia, 240 David Aghmashenebeli Alley, Tbilisi 0131, Georgia)

  • Nani Goginashvili

    (Scientific-Research Center of Agriculture, 6, Marshal Gelovani Ave, Tbilisi 0159, Georgia)

Abstract

Georgian forests are very valuable natural resources, but due to the lack of affordable alternatives to firewood, people are forced to use forest resources illegally and unsustainably. The aim of this study was to determine the productivity and biomass properties of four poplar clones from Aigeiros and Tacamahaca and one control clone, considering their wood and bark characteristics and their proportion in the stems. Short-rotation woody crops with these clones represent a potential source of commercial fuelwood production in Georgia as an alternative to natural forests. These tree characteristics were evaluated after three years of growth. The survival of the clones was generally high. No significant differences in biomass production (dry matter, DM) were found among the four clones tested (DM of approximately 4 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ), while the control clone achieved significantly lower values for DM. The biomass specific density was exceptionally high, at 481–588 kg m −3 , which was a result of the high proportion of bark mass in the stem (23.3–37.7%), with a density almost twice that of wood. On the other hand, the tested clones had a very high ash content in the biomass (2.6–4.5%), which negatively affected their energy potential expressed as a lower heating value (17,642–17,849 J g −1 ). Our preliminary results indicated that both the quantity and quality of biomass are important factors to justify the investment in an intensive poplar culture. The four clones should be further considered for commercial biomass production and tested at different sites in Georgia to evaluate the genotype-by-environment interactions and identify the site conditions required to justify such an investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzena Niemczyk & Margalita Bachilava & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Jewiarz & Giorgi Kavtaradze & Nani Goginashvili, 2021. "Productivity and Biomass Properties of Poplar Clones Managed in Short-Rotation Culture as a Potential Fuelwood Source in Georgia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3016-:d:560516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosso, Laura & Facciotto, Gianni & Bergante, Sara & Vietto, Lorenzo & Nervo, Giuseppe, 2013. "Selection and testing of Populus alba and Salix spp. as bioenergy feedstock: Preliminary results," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 87-92.
    2. Manzone, Marco & Calvo, Angela, 2016. "Energy and CO2 analysis of poplar and maize crops for biomass production in north Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 675-681.
    3. Njakou Djomo, S. & Ac, A. & Zenone, T. & De Groote, T. & Bergante, S. & Facciotto, G. & Sixto, H. & Ciria Ciria, P. & Weger, J. & Ceulemans, R., 2015. "Energy performances of intensive and extensive short rotation cropping systems for woody biomass production in the EU," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 845-854.
    4. Testa, Riccardo & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Foderà, Mario & Sgroi, Filippo & Tudisca, Salvatore, 2014. "Economic evaluation of introduction of poplar as biomass crop in Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 775-780.
    5. Krzysztof Mudryk & Marcin Jewiarz & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Niemiec & Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2021. "Evaluation of Urban Tree Leaf Biomass-Potential, Physico-Mechanical and Chemical Parameters of Raw Material and Solid Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Omoyemeh J. Ile & Hanna McCormick & Sheila Skrabacz & Shamik Bhattacharya & Maricar Aguilos & Henrique D. R. Carvalho & Joshua Idassi & Justin Baker & Joshua L. Heitman & John S. King, 2022. "Integrating Short Rotation Woody Crops into Conventional Agricultural Practices in the Southeastern United States: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Sławomir Francik & Bogusława Łapczyńska-Kordon & Norbert Pedryc & Wojciech Szewczyk & Renata Francik & Zbigniew Ślipek, 2022. "The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Determining Values of Selected Strength Parameters of Miscanthus × Giganteus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Badur, Janusz & Pawlak- Kruczek, Halina & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Krochmalny, Krystian & Mularski, Jakub & Madejski, Paweł & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2022. "Mathematical modelling of gasification process of sewage sludge in reactor of negative CO2 emission power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanbeveren, Stefan P.P. & Spinelli, Raffaele & Eisenbies, Mark & Schweier, Janine & Mola-Yudego, Blas & Magagnotti, Natascia & Acuna, Mauricio & Dimitriou, Ioannis & Ceulemans, Reinhart, 2017. "Mechanised harvesting of short-rotation coppices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 90-104.
    2. Rugani, Benedetto & Golkowska, Katarzyna & Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Koster, Daniel & Benetto, Enrico & Verdonckt, Pieter, 2015. "Simulation of environmental impact scores within the life cycle of mixed wood chips from alternative short rotation coppice systems in Flanders (Belgium)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 449-464.
    3. Manzone, Marco, 2015. "Energy consumption and CO2 analysis of different types of chippers used in wood biomass plantations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 686-692.
    4. Salvatore Digiesi & Giovanni Mummolo & Micaela Vitti, 2022. "Minimum Emissions Configuration of a Green Energy–Steel System: An Analytical Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    6. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of the Production of Perennial Crops for Energy Purposes—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Manzone, Marco & Calvo, Angela, 2016. "Energy and CO2 analysis of poplar and maize crops for biomass production in north Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 675-681.
    8. Xinhua Shen & Raghava R. Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2015. "The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Paweł Dudziec & Michał Krzyżaniak & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2021. "Solid Biomass Energy Potential as a Development Opportunity for Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Krzysztof Dziedzic & Bogusława Łapczyńska-Kordon & Michał Jurczyk & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Jewiarz & Krzysztof Mudryk & Tadeusz Pająk, 2022. "Solid Digestate—Mathematical Modeling of Combustion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Paniagua, S. & Escudero, L. & Escapa, C. & Coimbra, R.N. & Otero, M. & Calvo, L.F., 2016. "Effect of waste organic amendments on Populus sp biomass production and thermal characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 166-174.
    12. Pereira, S. & Costa, M., 2017. "Short rotation coppice for bioenergy: From biomass characterization to establishment – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1170-1180.
    13. Mauro Villarini & Vera Marcantonio & Andrea Colantoni & Enrico Bocci, 2019. "Sensitivity Analysis of Different Parameters on the Performance of a CHP Internal Combustion Engine System Fed by a Biomass Waste Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Scaramuzzino, Chiara & Garegnani, Giulia & Zambelli, Pietro, 2019. "Integrated approach for the identification of spatial patterns related to renewable energy potential in European territories," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Livingstone, David & Smyth, Beatrice M. & Lyons, Gary & Foley, Aoife M. & Murray, Simon T. & Johnston, Chris, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of a short-rotation coppice willow riparian buffer strip for farm nutrient mitigation and renewable energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Chinnici, Gaetano & D’Amico, Mario & Rizzo, Marcella & Pecorino, Biagio, 2015. "Analysis of biomass availability for energy use in Sicily," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1025-1030.
    17. Marco Manzone & Fabrizio Gioelli & Paolo Balsari, 2017. "Kiwi Clear‐Cut: First Evaluation of Recovered Biomass for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    18. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Kwiatkowski, Jacek & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan, 2018. "Energy and economic efficiency of camelina and crambe biomass production on a large-scale farm in north-eastern Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 770-780.
    19. Piyarath Saosee & Boonrod Sajjakulnukit & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Feedstock Security Analysis for Wood Pellet Production in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    20. John Nyandansobi Simon & Narissara Nuthammachot & Kuaanan Techato & Kingsley Ezechukwu Okpara & Sittiporn Channumsin & Rungnapa Kaewthongrach & Md. Sujahangir Kabir Sarkar, 2022. "Para Rubber ( Hevea brasiliensis ) Feedstock for Livelihoods Opportunities in Southern Thailand: Analysis of Socioeconomic Productivity Potentials and Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3016-:d:560516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.