IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v71y2025i5id10-2025-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from short-rotation coppice plantation in Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Budi Mulyana

    (Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Andrea Vityi

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary)

  • András Polgár

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary)

Abstract

A short-rotation coppice (SRC) system for bioenergy production is vital to supporting climate change mitigation by absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere and storing carbon as biomass. However, SRC's operation also released some greenhouse gas emissions, affecting the environment. This study aims to assess the potential environmental impacts through the life cycle assessment method in bioenergy production from the SRC system. Data was collected through a literature review and database, and the impact categories were then analysed using Sphera LCA for Experts Education License software (Version 9.2.1.68, 2020). In managing plantations for bioenergy production, plants during one rotation (15 years) will be harvested every 3 years (harvesting cycle). Then, there will be five harvesting cycles during a single rotation. The result showed that the first cycle had the highest environmental impacts because the inputs (fuel, lubricant, electricity, fertiliser, and pesticides) in this cycle were higher than others. The highest contribution comes from the first and end cycles as 3 200 and 2 700 kg CO2 eq, respectively. Meanwhile, cycles 2, 3, and 4 contribute to the carbon footprint as 2 500 kg CO2 eq for each cycle. Based on input, fuel consumption has resulted in higher environmental impacts than lubricants, fertilisers, and electricity consumption. In conclusion, energy consumption (fuel, lubricant, and electricity) and agrochemicals (fertilisers and pesticides) have released emissions and affected the environment. In the future, fuel and agrochemical consumption should be reduced to minimise the negative environmental impacts in the short-rotation coppice system.

Suggested Citation

  • Budi Mulyana & Andrea Vityi & András Polgár, 2025. "Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from short-rotation coppice plantation in Hungary," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(5), pages 237-249.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:71:y:2025:i:5:id:10-2025-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/10/2025-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/10/2025-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/10/2025-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/10/2025-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuyao Zhang & Weimin Zhang & Dayu Xu, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Complex Forestry Enterprise: A Case Study of a Forest–Fiberboard Integrated Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Manzone, Marco & Calvo, Angela, 2016. "Energy and CO2 analysis of poplar and maize crops for biomass production in north Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 675-681.
    3. Kamalakanta Sahoo & Richard Bergman & Sevda Alanya-Rosenbaum & Hongmei Gu & Shaobo Liang, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Based Products: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Daniel Koch & Anton Friedl & Bettina Mihalyi, 2023. "Influence of different LCIA methods on an exemplary scenario analysis from a process development LCA case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6269-6293, July.
    5. Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Kazimierz Warmiński & Edward Rój & Katarzyna Tyśkiewicz & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Poplar Biomass for High Value Products and Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cho, Seolhee & Kim, Jiyong, 2019. "Multi-site and multi-period optimization model for strategic planning of a renewable hydrogen energy network from biomass waste and energy crops," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 527-540.
    2. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    3. Xuyao Zhang & Weimin Zhang & Dayu Xu, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Complex Forestry Enterprise: A Case Study of a Forest–Fiberboard Integrated Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Niksa, Dariusz, 2016. "Analysis of the energy efficiency of short rotation woody crops biomass as affected by different methods of soil enrichment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 748-761.
    5. Tu, Bingqian & Chen, Ze & Dang, Jingqi, 2025. "The impact of foreign direct investment on innovation in China's forest products industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Xiaolan Wu & Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Assessment of Enterprise Life Cycle Based on Two-Stage Logistic Model: Exemplified by China’s Automobile Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Jihwi Jang & Su Young Woo & Myeong Ja Kwak & Sun Mi Je & Jong Kyu Lee & Ie Reh Kim, 2020. "Evaluation of Bioenergy Potential and Relative Impact of Microclimate Conditions for Sustainable Fuel Pellets Production and Carbon Sequestration of Short-Rotation Forestry ( Populus × Canadensis Moen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Iryna Zamula & Maryna Tanasiieva & Vitalii Travin & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Assessment of the Profitability of Environmental Activities in Forestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Kazimierz Warmiński & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2020. "Energy Value of Yield and Biomass Quality of Poplar Grown in Two Consecutive 4-Year Harvest Rotations in the North-East of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Sandra González-Rodríguez & Ana Arias & Gumersindo Feijoo & Maria Teresa Moreira, 2022. "Modelling and Environmental Profile Associated with the Valorization of Wheat Straw as Carbon Source in the Biotechnological Production of Manganese Peroxidase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Marzena Niemczyk & Margalita Bachilava & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Jewiarz & Giorgi Kavtaradze & Nani Goginashvili, 2021. "Productivity and Biomass Properties of Poplar Clones Managed in Short-Rotation Culture as a Potential Fuelwood Source in Georgia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Qianying Liao & Jun Zhang & Zili Yi & Youzhi Li, 2021. "Do Miscanthus lutarioriparius -Based Oriented Strand Boards Provide Environmentally Benign Alternatives? An LCA Case Study of Lake Dongting District in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Olba-Zięty, Ewelina, 2024. "Energy efficiency of Silphium perfoliatum and Helianthus salicifolius biomass production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    14. Mariana Hassegawa & Jo Van Brusselen & Mathias Cramm & Pieter Johannes Verkerk, 2022. "Wood-Based Products in the Circular Bioeconomy: Status and Opportunities towards Environmental Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Faramarz Khosravi & Gokhan Izbirak, 2025. "A copula-based exponential probabilistic model for factor-dependence social sustainability assessment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 433-481, January.
    16. Vito Imbrenda & Rosa Coluzzi & Francesca Mariani & Bogdana Nosova & Eva Cudlinova & Rosanna Salvia & Giovanni Quaranta & Luca Salvati & Maria Lanfredi, 2023. "Working in (Slow) Progress: Socio-Environmental and Economic Dynamics in the Forestry Sector and the Contribution to Sustainable Development in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Maria Lanfredi & Rosa Coluzzi & Vito Imbrenda & Bogdana Nosova & Massimiliano Giacalone & Rosario Turco & Marcela Prokopovà & Luca Salvati, 2023. "In-between Environmental Sustainability and Economic Viability: An Analysis of the State, Regulations, and Future of Italian Forestry Sector," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Scaramuzzino, Chiara & Garegnani, Giulia & Zambelli, Pietro, 2019. "Integrated approach for the identification of spatial patterns related to renewable energy potential in European territories," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-13.
    19. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Stefan Szczukowski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Józef Tworkowski, 2020. "Energy Value of Yield and Biomass Quality in a 7-Year Rotation of Willow Cultivated on Marginal Soil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Shanshan Wang & Jiaxin Chen & Michael T. Ter‐Mikaelian & Annie Levasseur & Hongqiang Yang, 2022. "From carbon neutral to climate neutral: Dynamic life cycle assessment for wood‐based panels produced in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1437-1449, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:71:y:2025:i:5:id:10-2025-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.