IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i2p480-d310415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preparation of Solid Fuel Hydrochar over Hydrothermal Carbonization of Red Jujube Branch

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyu Li

    (School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
    Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China)

  • Weiming Yi

    (School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Zhihe Li

    (School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Chunyan Tian

    (School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Peng Fu

    (School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Yuchun Zhang

    (School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Ling Zhou

    (College of Mechanic and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Jie Teng

    (School of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

Abstract

Biomass energy is becoming increasingly important, owing to the decreasing supply of fossil fuels and growing environmental problems. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a promising technology for producing solid biofuels from agricultural and forestry residues because of its lower fossil-fuel consumption. In this study, HTC was used to upgrade red jujube branch (RJB) to prepare hydrochar at six temperatures (220, 240, 260, 280, 300, and 320 °C) for 120 min, and at 300 °C for 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. The results showed that the energy recovery efficiency (ERE) reached maximum values of 80.42% and 79.86% at a residence time of 90 min and a reaction temperature of 220 °C, respectively. X-ray diffraction results and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurements show that the microcrystal features of RJB were destroyed, whereas the hydrochar contained an amorphous structure and mainly lignin fractions at increased temperatures. Thermogravimetric analysis shows that the hydrochar had better fuel qualities than RJB, making hydrochar easier to burn.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyu Li & Weiming Yi & Zhihe Li & Chunyan Tian & Peng Fu & Yuchun Zhang & Ling Zhou & Jie Teng, 2020. "Preparation of Solid Fuel Hydrochar over Hydrothermal Carbonization of Red Jujube Branch," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:480-:d:310415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/2/480/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/2/480/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eunhye Song & Seyong Park & Ho Kim, 2019. "Upgrading Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) Hydrochar from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Michela Lucian & Luca Fiori, 2017. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Biomass: Process Design, Modeling, Energy Efficiency and Cost Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Griffin, G.J. & Mubarak, N.M. & Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Abro, Rashid & Mazari, Shaukat Ali & Ali, Brahim Si, 2017. "An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1289-1299.
    4. Liu, Zhengang & Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar, 2014. "Upgrading of waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and low temperature pyrolysis (LTP): A comparative evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 857-864.
    5. Daegi Kim & Kunio Yoshikawa & Ki Young Park, 2015. "Characteristics of Biochar Obtained by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Cellulose for Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Chang Liu & Xin Huang & Lingzhao Kong, 2017. "Efficient Low Temperature Hydrothermal Carbonization of Chinese Reed for Biochar with High Energy Density," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Dhananjay Bhatt & Ankita Shrestha & Raj Kumar Dahal & Bishnu Acharya & Prabir Basu & Richard MacEwen, 2018. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biosolids from Waste Water Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jongkeun Lee & Sungwan Cho & Daegi Kim & JunHee Ryu & Kwanyong Lee & Haegeun Chung & Ki Young Park, 2021. "Conversion of Slaughterhouse Wastes to Solid Fuel Using Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Gabriel Gerner & Luca Meyer & Rahel Wanner & Thomas Keller & Rolf Krebs, 2021. "Sewage Sludge Treatment by Hydrothermal Carbonization: Feasibility Study for Sustainable Nutrient Recovery and Fuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Anna Partridge & Ekaterina Sermyagina & Esa Vakkilainen, 2020. "Impact of Pretreatment on Hydrothermally Carbonized Spruce," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Wei, Yingyuan & Fakudze, Sandile & Zhang, Yiming & Ma, Ru & Shang, Qianqian & Chen, Jianqiang & Liu, Chengguo & Chu, Qiulu, 2022. "Co-hydrothermal carbonization of pomelo peel and PVC for production of hydrochar pellets with enhanced fuel properties and dechlorination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhuang, Xiuzheng & Liu, Jianguo & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Chenguang & Zhan, Hao & Ma, Longlong, 2022. "A review on the utilization of industrial biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Manfredi Picciotto Maniscalco & Maurizio Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Valuable Tool for Energy and Environmental Applications: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Ye, Lian & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Guangwei & Wang, Chen & Mao, Xiaoming & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Li, Jinhua & Wang, Chuan, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of plastic and biomass hydrochar for blast furnace injection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    4. Chen, Lichun & Wen, Chang & Wang, Wenyu & Liu, Tianyu & Liu, Enze & Liu, Haowen & Li, Zexin, 2020. "Combustion behaviour of biochars thermally pretreated via torrefaction, slow pyrolysis, or hydrothermal carbonisation and co-fired with pulverised coal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 867-877.
    5. Wang, Liping & Chang, Yuzhi & Li, Aimin, 2019. "Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 423-440.
    6. Dhananjay Bhatt & Ankita Shrestha & Raj Kumar Dahal & Bishnu Acharya & Prabir Basu & Richard MacEwen, 2018. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biosolids from Waste Water Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Fabio Merzari & Jillian Goldfarb & Gianni Andreottola & Tanja Mimmo & Maurizio Volpe & Luca Fiori, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Strategy for Sewage Sludge Management: Influence of Process Withdrawal Point on Hydrochar Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Daniele Basso & Elsa Weiss-Hortala & Francesco Patuzzi & Marco Baratieri & Luca Fiori, 2018. "In Deep Analysis on the Behavior of Grape Marc Constituents during Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Kossińska, Nina & Krzyżyńska, Renata & Ghazal, Heba & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge and resulting biofuels as a sustainable energy source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    10. Ramos, João S. & Ferreira, Ana F., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of olive and wine industry co-products valorisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Zhang, Deli & Wang, Fang & Shen, Xiuli & Yi, Weiming & Li, Zhihe & Li, Yongjun & Tian, Chunyan, 2018. "Comparison study on fuel properties of hydrochars produced from corn stalk and corn stalk digestate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 527-536.
    12. Kim, Daegi & Park, Seyong & Park, Ki Young, 2017. "Upgrading the fuel properties of sludge and low rank coal mixed fuel through hydrothermal carbonization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 598-602.
    13. González-Arias, J. & Gómez, X. & González-Castaño, M. & Sánchez, M.E. & Rosas, J.G. & Cara-Jiménez, J., 2022. "Insights into the product quality and energy requirements for solid biofuel production: A comparison of hydrothermal carbonization, pyrolysis and torrefaction of olive tree pruning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    14. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    15. Seung-Yong Oh & Young-Man Yoon, 2017. "Energy Recovery Efficiency of Poultry Slaughterhouse Sludge Cake by Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Barbara Mendecka & Giovanni Di Ilio & Lidia Lombardi, 2020. "Thermo-Fluid Dynamic and Kinetic Modeling of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Olive Pomace in a Batch Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Denisa Djordjevićová & Marco Carnevale Miino & Jakub Raček & Tomáš Chorazy & Petr Hlavínek & Zuzana Vranayova, 2024. "Separation of Cellulose from Wastewater and Valorisation via Pyrolysis: A Case Study in the Czech Republic," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Daegi Kim & Kunio Yoshikawa & Ki Young Park, 2015. "Characteristics of Biochar Obtained by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Cellulose for Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Tiago Teribele & Maria Elizabeth Gemaque Costa & Conceição de Maria Sales da Silva & Lia Martins Pereira & Lucas Pinto Bernar & Douglas Alberto Rocha de Castro & Fernanda Paula da Costa Assunção & Mar, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Corn Stover: Structural Evolution of Hydro-Char and Degradation Kinetics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:480-:d:310415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.