IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i24p6728-d465392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the Minimum Head on Low-Head Hydropower Plants Energy Production and Profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Bartosz Ceran

    (Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3A, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Jakub Jurasz

    (Department of Engineering Management, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Robert Wróblewski

    (Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3A, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Adam Guderski

    (Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3A, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Daria Złotecka

    (Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3A, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Łukasz Kaźmierczak

    (Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3A, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

In Poland, existing barrages are characterized by relatively high flow and low head, which is challenging for the effective utilization of theoretical watercourse power. The paper presents the impact of the minimum head of the hydro sets on the annual electricity production of small hydropower plants at low-head locations for two types of water turbines: Archimedes and Kaplan turbines. A developed mathematical model was used to simulate energy yield from Archimedes and Kaplan turbines for a given value of the minimum technical head, depending on the number of installed hydro sets. For economic analysis purposes, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and net present value (NPV) indicators were calculated. The conducted research allowed for comparing Archimedes and Kaplan’s turbine operating conditions and how the minimum head parameter influences their electricity production and utilization time. As concluded in the results, the influence of minimum head in energy production is more distinct for the Archimedes screw technology than for the Kaplan turbine. The research shows that the decrease in energy production associated with the hydro unit’s minimum head parameter is from 0% to 30% for Kaplan, and it is 6% to 52% for Archimedes turbines.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartosz Ceran & Jakub Jurasz & Robert Wróblewski & Adam Guderski & Daria Złotecka & Łukasz Kaźmierczak, 2020. "Impact of the Minimum Head on Low-Head Hydropower Plants Energy Production and Profitability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6728-:d:465392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6728/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6728/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulu, B.G. & Jonsson, P.P. & Cervantes, M.J., 2012. "Experimental investigation of a Kaplan draft tube – Part I: Best efficiency point," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 695-706.
    2. Dellinger, Guilhem & Simmons, Scott & Lubitz, William David & Garambois, Pierre-André & Dellinger, Nicolas, 2019. "Effect of slope and number of blades on Archimedes screw generator power output," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 896-908.
    3. Hyoung-Ho Kim & Md Rakibuzzaman & Kyungwuk Kim & Sang-Ho Suh, 2019. "Flow and Fast Fourier Transform Analyses for Tip Clearance Effect in an Operating Kaplan Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Zhou, Daqing & Deng, Zhiqun (Daniel), 2017. "Ultra-low-head hydroelectric technology: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 23-30.
    5. Quaranta, Emanuele & Revelli, Roberto, 2018. "Gravity water wheels as a micro hydropower energy source: A review based on historic data, design methods, efficiencies and modern optimizations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 414-427.
    6. Balkhair, Khaled S. & Rahman, Khalil Ur, 2017. "Sustainable and economical small-scale and low-head hydropower generation: A promising alternative potential solution for energy generation at local and regional scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 378-391.
    7. Elbatran, A.H. & Yaakob, O.B. & Ahmed, Yasser M. & Shabara, H.M., 2015. "Operation, performance and economic analysis of low head micro-hydropower turbines for rural and remote areas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 40-50.
    8. Lavrič, Henrik & Rihar, Andraž & Fišer, Rastko, 2019. "Influence of equipment size and installation height on electricity production in an Archimedes screw-based ultra-low head small hydropower plant and its economic feasibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 468-477.
    9. Punys, Petras & Kvaraciejus, Algis & Dumbrauskas, Antanas & Šilinis, Linas & Popa, Bogdan, 2019. "An assessment of micro-hydropower potential at historic watermill, weir, and non-powered dam sites in selected EU countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1108-1123.
    10. Rohmer, Julien & Knittel, Dominique & Sturtzer, Guy & Flieller, Damien & Renaud, Jean, 2016. "Modeling and experimental results of an Archimedes screw turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 136-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakub Jurasz & Jerzy Mikulik & Paweł B. Dąbek & Mohammed Guezgouz & Bartosz Kaźmierczak, 2021. "Complementarity and ‘Resource Droughts’ of Solar and Wind Energy in Poland: An ERA5-Based Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Shuo Huang & Xinyu Wu & Yiyang Wu & Zheng Zhang, 2023. "Mid-Term Optimal Scheduling of Low-Head Cascaded Hydropower Stations Considering Inflow Unevenness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Carolina Gil Marcelino & Carlos Camacho-Gómez & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Sancho Salcedo-Sanz, 2021. "Optimal Generation Scheduling in Hydro-Power Plants with the Coral Reefs Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lavrič, Henrik & Rihar, Andraž & Fišer, Rastko, 2019. "Influence of equipment size and installation height on electricity production in an Archimedes screw-based ultra-low head small hydropower plant and its economic feasibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 468-477.
    2. Zhou, Daqing & Gui, Jia & Deng, Zhiqun Daniel & Chen, Huixiang & Yu, Yunyun & Yu, An & Yang, Chunxia, 2019. "Development of an ultra-low head siphon hydro turbine using computational fluid dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 43-50.
    3. Zielinski, Michał & Myszkowski, Adam & Pelic, Marcin & Staniek, Roman, 2022. "Low-speed radial piston pump as an effective alternative power transmission for small hydropower plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1012-1027.
    4. Chen, Huixiang & Zhou, Daqing & Kan, Kan & Xu, Hui & Zheng, Yuan & Binama, Maxime & Xu, Zhe & Feng, Jiangang, 2021. "Experimental investigation of a model bulb turbine under steady state and load rejection process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 254-265.
    5. Heider, Katharina & Quaranta, Emanuele & García Avilés, José María & Rodriguez Lopez, Juan Miguel & Balbo, Andrea L. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Reinventing the wheel – The preservation and potential of traditional water wheels in the terraced irrigated landscapes of the Ricote Valley, southeast Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Kuo-Chen Wu & Jui-Chu Lin & Wen-Te Chang & Chia-Szu Yen & Huang-Jie Fu, 2023. "Research and Analysis of Promotional Policies for Small Hydropower Generation in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Arash YoosefDoost & William David Lubitz, 2020. "Archimedes Screw Turbines: A Sustainable Development Solution for Green and Renewable Energy Generation—A Review of Potential and Design Procedures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-34, September.
    8. Dylan Sheneth Edirisinghe & Ho-Seong Yang & Min-Sung Kim & Byung-Ha Kim & Sudath Prasanna Gunawardane & Young-Ho Lee, 2021. "Computational Flow Analysis on a Real Scale Run-of-River Archimedes Screw Turbine with a High Incline Angle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Huixiang Chen & Daqing Zhou & Yuan Zheng & Shengwen Jiang & An Yu & You Guo, 2018. "Load Rejection Transient Process Simulation of a Kaplan Turbine Model by Co-Adjusting Guide Vanes and Runner Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Lavrič, Henrik & Rihar, Andraž & Fišer, Rastko, 2018. "Simulation of electrical energy production in Archimedes screw-based ultra-low head small hydropower plant considering environment protection conditions and technical limitations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 87-98.
    11. Hansen, Carly & Musa, Mirko & Sasthav, Colin & DeNeale, Scott, 2021. "Hydropower development potential at non-powered dams: Data needs and research gaps," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Ameen Mohammed Salih Ameen & Mohammed Suleman Aldlemy & Mumtaz Ali & Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan & Senlin Zhu & Ahmed Mohammed Sami Al-Janabi & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Tiyasha Tiyasha &, 2020. "State-of-the Art-Powerhouse, Dam Structure, and Turbine Operation and Vibrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-40, February.
    13. Niebuhr, C.M. & van Dijk, M. & Neary, V.S. & Bhagwan, J.N., 2019. "A review of hydrokinetic turbines and enhancement techniques for canal installations: Technology, applicability and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Marco van Dijk & Stefanus Johannes van Vuuren & Giovanna Cavazzini & Chantel Monica Niebuhr & Alberto Santolin, 2022. "Optimizing Conduit Hydropower Potential by Determining Pareto-Optimal Trade-Off Curve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Yao, Yao & Shen, Zhicheng & Wang, Qiliang & Du, Jiyun & Lu, Lin & Yang, Hongxing, 2023. "Development of an inline bidirectional micro crossflow turbine for hydropower harvesting from water supply pipelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    16. Zhou, Yuzhou & Zhao, Jiexing & Zhai, Qiaozhu, 2021. "100% renewable energy: A multi-stage robust scheduling approach for cascade hydropower system with wind and photovoltaic power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    17. Ludovic Cassan & Guilhem Dellinger & Pascal Maussion & Nicolas Dellinger, 2021. "Hydrostatic Pressure Wheel for Regulation of Open Channel Networks and for the Energy Supply of Isolated Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Lai, Xi-De & Liang, Quan-Wei & Ye, Dao-Xing & Chen, Xiao-Ming & Xia, Mi-Mi, 2019. "Experimental investigation of flows inside draft tube of a high-head pump-turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 731-742.
    19. Eva Bílková & Jiří Souček & Martin Kantor & Roman Kubíček & Petr Nowak, 2023. "Variable-Speed Propeller Turbine for Small Hydropower Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Nishi, Yasuyuki & Mori, Nozomi & Yamada, Naoki & Inagaki, Terumi, 2022. "Study on the design method for axial flow runner that combines design of experiments, response surface method, and optimization method to one-dimensional design method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 96-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6728-:d:465392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.