IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4745-d412271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Time History on Normal Behaviour Modelling Using SCADA Data to Predict Wind Turbine Failures

Author

Listed:
  • Conor McKinnon

    (Centre for Doctoral Training of Wind and Marine Energy Systems, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alan Turnbull

    (Centre for Doctoral Training of Wind and Marine Energy Systems, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sofia Koukoura

    (Centre for Doctoral Training of Wind and Marine Energy Systems, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK)

  • James Carroll

    (Centre for Doctoral Training of Wind and Marine Energy Systems, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK)

  • Alasdair McDonald

    (Centre for Doctoral Training of Wind and Marine Energy Systems, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK)

Abstract

Operations and Maintenance (O&M) can make up a significant proportion of lifetime costs associated with any wind farm, with up to 30% reported for some offshore developments. It is increasingly important for wind farm owners and operators to optimise their assets in order to reduce the levelised cost of energy (LCoE). Reducing downtime through condition-based maintenance is a promising strategy of realising these goals. This is made possible through increased monitoring and gathering of operational data. SCADA data are useful in terms of wind turbine condition monitoring. This paper aims to perform a comprehensive comparison between two types of normal behaviour modelling: full signal reconstruction (FSRC) and autoregressive models with exogenous inputs (ARX). At the same time, the effects of the training time period on model performance are explored by considering models trained with both 12 and 6 months of data. Finally, the effects of time resolution are analysed for each algorithm by considering models trained and tested with both 10 and 60 min averaged data. Two different cases of wind turbine faults are examined. In both cases, the NARX model trained with 12 months of 10 min average Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) data had the best training performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Conor McKinnon & Alan Turnbull & Sofia Koukoura & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald, 2020. "Effect of Time History on Normal Behaviour Modelling Using SCADA Data to Predict Wind Turbine Failures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4745-:d:412271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Wenguang & Liu, Chao & Jiang, Dongxiang, 2018. "An unsupervised spatiotemporal graphical modeling approach for wind turbine condition monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 230-241.
    2. Hussain, Sajid & Al-Alili, Ali, 2016. "A new approach for model validation in solar radiation using wavelet, phase and frequency coherence analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 639-649.
    3. Yang, Wenxian & Court, Richard & Jiang, Jiesheng, 2013. "Wind turbine condition monitoring by the approach of SCADA data analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 365-376.
    4. Yonglong Yan & Jian Li & David Wenzhong Gao, 2014. "Condition Parameter Modeling for Anomaly Detection in Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han Peng & Songyin Li & Linjian Shangguan & Yisa Fan & Hai Zhang, 2023. "Analysis of Wind Turbine Equipment Failure and Intelligent Operation and Maintenance Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Wang, Ziqi & Liu, Changliang & Yan, Feng, 2022. "Condition monitoring of wind turbine based on incremental learning and multivariate state estimation technique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 343-360.
    3. Urmeneta, Jon & Izquierdo, Juan & Leturiondo, Urko, 2023. "A methodology for performance assessment at system level—Identification of operating regimes and anomaly detection in wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 281-292.
    4. Bruce Stephen, 2022. "Machine Learning Applications in Power System Condition Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-2, March.
    5. Meyer, Angela, 2021. "Multi-target normal behaviour models for wind farm condition monitoring," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    6. Xiangqing Yin & Yi Liu & Li Yang & Wenchao Gao, 2022. "Abnormal Data Cleaning Method for Wind Turbines Based on Constrained Curve Fitting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Sun & Jian Li & Junsheng Chen & Xiao Lei, 2016. "A Short-Term Outage Model of Wind Turbines with Doubly Fed Induction Generators Based on Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Feng, Chenlong & Liu, Chao & Jiang, Dongxiang, 2023. "Unsupervised anomaly detection using graph neural networks integrated with physical-statistical feature fusion and local-global learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 309-323.
    3. Moghaddass, Ramin & Sheng, Shuangwen, 2019. "An anomaly detection framework for dynamic systems using a Bayesian hierarchical framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 561-582.
    4. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    5. Fanghong Zhang & Yuze Zhu & Chuanjiang Zhang & Peng Yu & Qingan Li, 2023. "Abnormality Detection Method for Wind Turbine Bearings Based on CNN-LSTM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Chen, Wanqiu & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Li, Ye & Kusiak, Andrew, 2021. "Diagnosis of wind turbine faults with transfer learning algorithms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2053-2067.
    7. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Ruiz de la Hermosa González-Carrato, Raúl & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Dimlaye, Vichaar, 2015. "Maintenance management of wind turbines structures via MFCs and wavelet transforms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 472-482.
    9. Alessandro Murgia & Robbert Verbeke & Elena Tsiporkova & Ludovico Terzi & Davide Astolfi, 2023. "Discussion on the Suitability of SCADA-Based Condition Monitoring for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis through Temperature Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Ren, He & Liu, Wenyi & Shan, Mengchen & Wang, Xin & Wang, Zhengfeng, 2021. "A novel wind turbine health condition monitoring method based on composite variational mode entropy and weighted distribution adaptation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 972-980.
    11. Sun, Shilin & Wang, Tianyang & Chu, Fulei, 2022. "In-situ condition monitoring of wind turbine blades: A critical and systematic review of techniques, challenges, and futures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Lei Fu & Tiantian Zhu & Kai Zhu & Yiling Yang, 2019. "Condition Monitoring for the Roller Bearings of Wind Turbines under Variable Working Conditions Based on the Fisher Score and Permutation Entropy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Yang, Chunzhen & Liu, Jingquan & Zeng, Yuyun & Xie, Guangyao, 2019. "Real-time condition monitoring and fault detection of components based on machine-learning reconstruction model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 433-441.
    14. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    15. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    16. Yuansheng Huang & Lei Yang & Shijian Liu & Guangli Wang, 2019. "Multi-Step Wind Speed Forecasting Based On Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, Long Short Term Memory Network and Error Correction Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Natei Ermias Benti & Mesfin Diro Chaka & Addisu Gezahegn Semie, 2023. "Forecasting Renewable Energy Generation with Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Current Advances and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, April.
    18. Olubayo M. Babatunde & Josiah L. Munda & Yskandar Hamam, 2020. "Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Neural Network Trained with Differential Evolution for Estimating Global Solar Radiation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Jing, Bo & Qian, Zheng & Pei, Yan & Zhang, Lizhong & Yang, Tingyi, 2020. "Improving wind turbine efficiency through detection and calibration of yaw misalignment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1217-1227.
    20. Xu, Qifa & Fan, Zhenhua & Jia, Weiyin & Jiang, Cuixia, 2020. "Fault detection of wind turbines via multivariate process monitoring based on vine copulas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 939-955.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4745-:d:412271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.