IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i16p4188-d398470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Comparative Assessment of Integrated Gasification Gas Cycle with CaO Looping and CO 2 Adsorption by Activated Carbon: A Case Study of the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Kristína Zakuciová

    (ÚJV Řež, a. s., Hlavní 130, Řež, 250 68 Husinec, Czech Republic
    Department of Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Praha 6, Czech Republic)

  • Ana Carvalho

    (CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Jiří Štefanica

    (ÚJV Řež, a. s., Hlavní 130, Řež, 250 68 Husinec, Czech Republic)

  • Monika Vitvarová

    (Department of Energy Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 166 28 Praha 6, Czech Republic)

  • Lukáš Pilař

    (Department of Energy Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 166 28 Praha 6, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Kočí

    (Department of Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Praha 6, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The Czech Republic is gradually shifting toward a low-carbon economy. The transition process requires measures that will help to contain energy production and help to reduce emissions from the coal industry. Viable measures are seen in carbon capture technologies (CCTs). The main focus is on the environmental and economic comparison of two innovative CCTs that are integrated in the operational Czech energy units. The assessed scenarios are (1) the scenario of pre-combustion CO 2 capture integrated into the gasification combined cycle (IGCC-CaL) and (2) the scenario of post-combustion capture by adsorption of CO 2 by activated carbon (PCC-A). An environmental assessment is performed through a life-cycle assessment method and compares the systems in the phase of characterization, normalization, and relative contribution of the processes to the environmental categories. Economic assessment compares CCT via capture and avoided costs of CO 2 and their correlation with CO 2 allowance market trend. The paper concludes with the selection of the most suitable CCT in the conditions of the Czech Republic by combining the scores of environmental and economic parameters. While the specific case of IGCC-CaL shows improvement in the environmental assessment, the economic analysis resulted in favor of PCC-A. The lower environmental–economic combination score results in the selection of IGCC-CaL as the more viable option in comparison with PCC-A in the current Czech energy and economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristína Zakuciová & Ana Carvalho & Jiří Štefanica & Monika Vitvarová & Lukáš Pilař & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Environmental and Comparative Assessment of Integrated Gasification Gas Cycle with CaO Looping and CO 2 Adsorption by Activated Carbon: A Case Study of the Czech Republic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4188-:d:398470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4188/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4188/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristína Zakuciová & Jiří Štefanica & Ana Carvalho & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Environmental Assessment of a Coal Power Plant with Carbon Dioxide Capture System Based on the Activated Carbon Adsorption Process: A Case Study of the Czech Republic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    2. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    3. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    4. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Xiang, Dong & Xiang, Junjie & Sun, Zhe & Cao, Yan, 2017. "The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 78-91.
    6. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2023. "Green hydrogen production from decarbonized biomass gasification: An integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    8. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    9. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Environmental and Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-8, November.
    13. Li, Fang-zhou & Kang, Jing-xian & Song, Yun-cai & Feng, Jie & Li, Wen-ying, 2020. "Thermodynamic feasibility for molybdenum-based gaseous oxides assisted looping coal gasification and its derived power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Yulei Xie & Zhenghui Fu & Dehong Xia & Wentao Lu & Guohe Huang & Han Wang, 2019. "Integrated Planning for Regional Electric Power System Management with Risk Measure and Carbon Emission Constraints: A Case Study of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & Li, Sheng & Wang, Dan, 2022. "A comprehensive evaluation model for full-chain CCUS performance based on the analytic hierarchy process method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    17. Ammar Bany Ata & Peter Maximilian Seufert & Christian Heinze & Falah Alobaid & Bernd Epple, 2021. "Optimization of Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plant for Polygeneration of Power and Chemicals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Janusz Zdeb & Natalia Howaniec & Adam Smoliński, 2019. "Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in Coal Gasification—An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    19. Wang, Yuan & Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Yu, Jianting & Zhang, Chaoli & Wang, Zi, 2023. "Comparative exergoeconomic analysis of atmosphere and pressurized CLC power plants coupled with supercritical CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    20. Liu, Huan & Guo, Wei & Liu, Shuqin, 2022. "Comparative techno-economic performance analysis of underground coal gasification and surface coal gasification based coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4188-:d:398470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.