IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i9p1741-d229195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring a Sample of Main Televisions and Connected Entertainment Systems in Northern Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Gianluca Ruggieri

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Paolo Zangheri

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Mattia Bulgarelli

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Patrizia Pistochini

    (Energy Efficiency Unit Department, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), 21027 Ispra, Italy)

Abstract

Energy labels are a powerful instrument to influence the electricity consumption of appliances and lighting devices in households. However, the real consumption data depend on a number of different factors, including marketing policies, purchase preferences, technology development, and last but not least behavioural habits. While white appliance consumption trends tend to change over a longer period, the use of entertainment devices changes quickly. A number of different devices (digital versatile disc (DVD) player, decoder, game console, home theater, video recorder) are normally connected to the main television set, and these devices change rapidly, and, at the same time, new behaviors are emerging. There is an increasing gap between, on one hand, the higher consumption of televisions and connected devices and the number of regulations developed for their regulation, and, on the other hand, the lack of knowledge on the real onsite consumption. In order to fill this gap, in 2017, a measurement campaign was promoted and developed in some households in northern Italy. The consumption of 28 main televisions and 14 entertainment systems was measured on a daily basis for at least two weeks. Standby consumptions were measured as well. On the basis of outcomes evaluated, it results that these devices are responsible for 9.3% of total electricity consumption as an average of 5.6% for televisions and 3.7% of the attached devices. Standby consumption is still considerably high (3.6% of the total electricity consumption), especially for satellite decoders. Some interesting correlations were studied highlighting the effect of the introduction of the energy labels or the increasing size of the TV over time. The main results obtained were compared to those of previous monitoring campaigns launched in Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianluca Ruggieri & Paolo Zangheri & Mattia Bulgarelli & Patrizia Pistochini, 2019. "Monitoring a Sample of Main Televisions and Connected Entertainment Systems in Northern Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1741-:d:229195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1741/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1741/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crosbie, Tracey, 2008. "Household energy consumption and consumer electronics: The case of television," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 2191-2199, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeroen Stragier & Laurence Hauttekeete & Lieven De Marez & Sven Claessens, 2013. "Towards More Energy Efficient Domestic Appliances? Measuring the Perception of Households on Smart Appliances," Energy & Environment, , vol. 24(5), pages 689-700, September.
    2. Hamza, Neveen & Gilroy, Rose, 2011. "The challenge to UK energy policy: An ageing population perspective on energy saving measures and consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 782-789, February.
    3. Woojae Kim & Sungmin Ko & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2019. "Is an Incentive Policy for Energy Efficient Products Effective for Air Purifiers? The Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Stefanie Heinzle, 2012. "Disclosure of Energy Operating Cost Information: A Silver Bullet for Overcoming the Energy-Efficiency Gap?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 43-64, March.
    5. Stamatios Ntanos & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Vasilios Palios & Miltiadis Chalikias, 2018. "Environmental Behavior of Secondary Education Students: A Case Study at Central Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Røpke, Inge & Haunstrup Christensen, Toke & Ole Jensen, Jesper, 2010. "Information and communication technologies - A new round of household electrification," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1764-1773, April.
    7. Røpke, Inge, 2012. "The unsustainable directionality of innovation – The example of the broadband transition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1631-1642.
    8. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2017. "ICT entertainment appliances’ impact on domestic electricity consumption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 843-853.
    9. Lopes, M.A.R. & Antunes, C.H. & Martins, N., 2012. "Energy behaviours as promoters of energy efficiency: A 21st century review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4095-4104.
    10. McMeekin, Andrew & Geels, Frank W. & Hodson, Mike, 2019. "Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: Analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system (1990–2016)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1216-1231.
    11. Mona Komeijani & Erinn G. Ryen & Callie W. Babbitt, 2016. "Bridging the Gap between Eco-Design and the Human Thinking System," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Qiushi Feng & Zhenglian Wang & Simon Choi & Yi Zeng, 2020. "Forecast Households at the County Level: An Application of the ProFamy Extended Cohort-Component Method in Six Counties of Southern California, 2010 to 2040," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(2), pages 253-281, April.
    13. Corina Pelau & Carmen Acatrinei, 2019. "The Paradox of Energy Consumption Decrease in the Transition Period towards a Digital Society," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Nie, Hongguang & Kemp, René, 2014. "Index decomposition analysis of residential energy consumption in China: 2002–2010," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 10-19.
    15. Ma, Guo & Andrews-Speed, Philip & Zhang, Jiandong, 2013. "Chinese consumer attitudes towards energy saving: The case of household electrical appliances in Chongqing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 591-602.
    16. Marco Gusukuma & Ramzy Kahhat & Kathia Cáceres, 2022. "Evolution of the stock of electrical and electronic equipment in the Peruvian residential sector," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 952-963, June.
    17. Li, Yi & Liu, Tianya & Xu, Jinpeng, 2023. "Analyzing the economic, social, and technological determinants of renewable and nonrenewable electricity production in China: Findings from time series models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1741-:d:229195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.