IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i4p678-d207500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Impacts Analysis of Direct Methanation of Glycerol to Bio-Synthetic Natural Gas at a Biodiesel Refinery

Author

Listed:
  • Robert White

    (Centre for Doctoral Training Bioenergy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
    School of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Freddy Segundo Navarro-Pineda

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérid 97000, Mexico)

  • Timothy Cockerill

    (School of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
    Centre for Integrated Energy Research, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Valerie Dupont

    (School of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Julio César Sacramento Rivero

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérid 97000, Mexico)

Abstract

An economic and environmental feasibility study were carried out on the thermochemical conversion of glycerol to medium methane content biological synthetic natural gas (bio-SNG). A plant that processed 497 kg·h −1 of glycerol to bio-SNG was modelled as an on-site addition to a soybean biodiesel plant based in Missouri (USA) that produced 30 million litres of soybean biodiesel per year. Assuming the glycerol contained only 80 wt% free glycerol, the bio-SNG could substitute up to 24% of the natural gas at the soybean biodiesel plant. The discounted cash flow analysis showed it was possible to generate positive NPVs and achieve internal rates of return within the hurdle rate (12%) for biomass gasification technologies. From the environmental analysis it was found that the bio-SNG could reduce global warming potential by 28% when compared to conventional natural gas in the USA and translates to roughly 7% reduction in biodiesel natural gas emissions, if the maximum 24% of natural gas were to be substituted by bio-SNG. The work highlights the potential to divert waste glycerol to an onsite energy vector at soybean biodiesel plants with minimal change to the main biodiesel production process and potential reductions to soybean biodiesel global warming potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert White & Freddy Segundo Navarro-Pineda & Timothy Cockerill & Valerie Dupont & Julio César Sacramento Rivero, 2019. "Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Impacts Analysis of Direct Methanation of Glycerol to Bio-Synthetic Natural Gas at a Biodiesel Refinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:678-:d:207500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/4/678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/4/678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abel Rodrigues & João Carlos Bordado & Rui Galhano dos Santos, 2017. "Upgrading the Glycerol from Biodiesel Production as a Source of Energy Carriers and Chemicals—A Technological Review for Three Chemical Pathways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-36, November.
    2. He, Quan (Sophia) & McNutt, Josiah & Yang, Jie, 2017. "Utilization of the residual glycerol from biodiesel production for renewable energy generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-76.
    3. Tran, Thomas T.D. & Smith, Amanda D., 2018. "Incorporating performance-based global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis into LCOE calculations for emerging renewable energy technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 157-171.
    4. Rotunno, Paolo & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Energy and economic analysis of a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 417-432.
    5. Ogidiama, Oghare Victor & Abu-Zahra, Mohammad R.M. & Shamim, Tariq, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a poly-generation solar-assisted chemical looping combustion power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 724-735.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamošiūnas, Andrius & Gimžauskaitė, Dovilė & Uscila, Rolandas & Aikas, Mindaugas, 2019. "Thermal arc plasma gasification of waste glycerol to syngas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Liu, Chunyu & Zheng, Xinrui & Yang, Haibin & Tang, Waiching & Sang, Guochen & Cui, Hongzhi, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation of energy storage systems for concentrated solar power plants using the Monte Carlo method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    4. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Duong, Pham Luu Trung & Minh, Le Quang & Lee, Sanggyu & Lee, Moonyong, 2019. "Dual mixed refrigerant LNG process: Uncertainty quantification and dimensional reduction sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1446-1456.
    5. Zhang, Lijun & Li, Ye & Xu, Wenhao & Gao, Zhiteng & Fang, Long & Li, Rongfu & Ding, Boyin & Zhao, Bin & Leng, Jun & He, Fenglan, 2022. "Systematic analysis of performance and cost of two floating offshore wind turbines with significant interactions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    6. Luerssen, Christoph & Verbois, Hadrien & Gandhi, Oktoviano & Reindl, Thomas & Sekhar, Chandra & Cheong, David, 2021. "Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the levelised cost of storage (LCOS) for solar-PV-powered cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    7. Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Boreum & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Projected cost analysis of hybrid methanol production from tri-reforming of methane integrated with various water electrolysis systems: Technical and economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    9. Cédric Decarpigny & Abdulhadi Aljawish & Cédric His & Bertrand Fertin & Muriel Bigan & Pascal Dhulster & Michel Millares & Rénato Froidevaux, 2022. "Bioprocesses for the Biodiesel Production from Waste Oils and Valorization of Glycerol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-30, May.
    10. Saifuddin Nomanbhay & Mei Yin Ong & Kit Wayne Chew & Pau-Loke Show & Man Kee Lam & Wei-Hsin Chen, 2020. "Organic Carbonate Production Utilizing Crude Glycerol Derived as By-Product of Biodiesel Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Barbón, A. & Fernández-Rubiera, J.A. & Martínez-Valledor, L. & Pérez-Fernández, A. & Bayón, L., 2021. "Design and construction of a solar tracking system for small-scale linear Fresnel reflector with three movements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Savvas L. Douvartzides & Nikolaos D. Charisiou & Kyriakos N. Papageridis & Maria A. Goula, 2019. "Green Diesel: Biomass Feedstocks, Production Technologies, Catalytic Research, Fuel Properties and Performance in Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-41, February.
    13. Xintao Li & Xue’er Xu & Diyi Liu & Mengqiao Han & Siqi Li, 2022. "Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for the Solar Photovoltaic System in the Post-Subsidy Era: A Comparative Analysis under an Urban-Rural Divide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Ismail Kamdar & Shahid Ali & Juntakan Taweekun & Hafiz Muhammad Ali, 2021. "Wind Farm Site Selection Using WAsP Tool for Application in the Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Urbano, Eva M. & Martinez-Viol, Victor & Kampouropoulos, Konstantinos & Romeral, Luis, 2022. "Risk assessment of energy investment in the industrial framework – Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for energy design and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    16. Aree Wangsupphaphol & Surachai Chaitusaney & Mohamed Salem, 2023. "A Techno-Economic Assessment of a Second-Life Battery and Photovoltaics Hybrid Power Source for Sustainable Electric Vehicle Home Charging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Zhang, Lige & Spatari, Sabrina & Sun, Ying, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of novel heat exchanger for dry cooling of power plants based on encapsulated phase change materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Sebastia-Saez, Daniel & Pastor-Pérez, Laura & Reina, Tomas Ramirez, 2021. "Analysis of the potential for biogas upgrading to syngas via catalytic reforming in the United Kingdom," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Abd, Ammar Ali & Othman, Mohd Roslee & Helwani, Zuchra & Kim, Jinsoo, 2023. "Waste to wheels: Performance comparison between pressure swing adsorption and amine-absorption technologies for upgrading biogas containing hydrogen sulfide to fuel grade standards," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    20. Prakash, Vrishab & Ghosh, Sajal & Kanjilal, Kakali, 2020. "Costs of avoided carbon emission from thermal and renewable sources of power in India and policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:678-:d:207500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.