IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i20p3916-d277023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Performance of Different Technological Based Bio-Refineries for Biofuel Production

Author

Listed:
  • Shemelis N. Gebremariam

    (Faculty of Science and Technology (REALTEK), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Drøbakveien 31, 1432 Ås, Norway)

  • Trine Hvoslef-Eide

    (Department of Plant Sciences (IPV), Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Arboretveien 6, 1432 Ås, Norway)

  • Meseret T. Terfa

    (Department of Plant & Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, P. O. Box 05, Hawassa, Ethiopia)

  • Jorge M. Marchetti

    (Faculty of Science and Technology (REALTEK), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Drøbakveien 31, 1432 Ås, Norway)

Abstract

There are different technologies for biodiesel production, each having its benefits and drawbacks depending on the type of feedstock and catalyst used. In this study, the techno-economic performances of four catalyst technologies were investigated. The catalysts were bulk calcium oxide (CaO), enzyme, nano-calcium oxide, and ionic liquid. The study was mainly based on process simulations designed using Aspen Plus and SuperPro software. The quantity and quality of biodiesel and glycerol, as well as the amount of biodiesel per amount of feedstock, were the parameters to evaluate technical performances. The parameters for economic performances were total investment cost, unit production cost, net present value (NPV), internal return rate (IRR), and return over investment (ROI). Technically, all the studied options provided fuel quality biodiesel and high purity glycerol. However, under the assumed market scenario, the process using bulk CaO catalyst was more economically feasible and tolerable to the change in market values of major inputs and outputs. On the contrary, the enzyme catalyst option was very expensive and economically infeasible for all considered ranges of cost of feedstock and product. The result of this study could be used as a basis to do detail estimates for the practical implementation of the efficient process.

Suggested Citation

  • Shemelis N. Gebremariam & Trine Hvoslef-Eide & Meseret T. Terfa & Jorge M. Marchetti, 2019. "Techno-Economic Performance of Different Technological Based Bio-Refineries for Biofuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3916-:d:277023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gog, Adriana & Roman, Marius & Toşa, Monica & Paizs, Csaba & Irimie, Florin Dan, 2012. "Biodiesel production using enzymatic transesterification – Current state and perspectives," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 10-16.
    2. J.M. Marchetti & M.N. Pedernera & N.S. Schbib, 2010. "Production of biodiesel from acid oil using sulfuric acid as catalyst: kinetics study," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 38-43, September.
    3. Baskar, G. & Soumiya, S., 2016. "Production of biodiesel from castor oil using iron (II) doped zinc oxide nanocatalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 101-107.
    4. Marinković, Dalibor M. & Stanković, Miroslav V. & Veličković, Ana V. & Avramović, Jelena M. & Miladinović, Marija R. & Stamenković, Olivera O. & Veljković, Vlada B. & Jovanović, Dušan M., 2016. "Calcium oxide as a promising heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production: Current state and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1387-1408.
    5. Rodica Niculescu & Adrian Clenci & Victor Iorga-Siman, 2019. "Review on the Use of Diesel–Biodiesel–Alcohol Blends in Compression Ignition Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-41, March.
    6. Chattopadhyay, Soham & Sen, Ramkrishna, 2013. "Fuel properties, engine performance and environmental benefits of biodiesel produced by a green process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 319-326.
    7. Gui, M.M. & Lee, K.T. & Bhatia, S., 2008. "Feasibility of edible oil vs. non-edible oil vs. waste edible oil as biodiesel feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1646-1653.
    8. Arbab, M.I. & Masjuki, H.H. & Varman, M. & Kalam, M.A. & Imtenan, S. & Sajjad, H., 2013. "Fuel properties, engine performance and emission characteristic of common biodiesels as a renewable and sustainable source of fuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 133-147.
    9. Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Wu, Xuan & Leung, M.K.H., 2010. "A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1083-1095, April.
    10. Kumar, Ashwani & Sharma, Satyawati, 2011. "Potential non-edible oil resources as biodiesel feedstock: An Indian perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1791-1800, May.
    11. Borges, M.E. & Díaz, L., 2012. "Recent developments on heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production by oil esterification and transesterification reactions: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2839-2849.
    12. Ullah, Zahoor & Bustam, Mohamad Azmi & Man, Zakaria, 2015. "Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil by acidic ionic liquid as a catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 521-526.
    13. Yang, Liuqing & Takase, Mohammed & Zhang, Min & Zhao, Ting & Wu, Xiangyang, 2014. "Potential non-edible oil feedstock for biodiesel production in Africa: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 461-477.
    14. Chouhan, A.P. Singh & Sarma, A.K., 2011. "Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4378-4399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakub Čedík & Martin Pexa & Michal Holúbek & Zdeněk Aleš & Radek Pražan & Peter Kuchar, 2020. "Effect of Diesel Fuel-Coconut Oil-Butanol Blends on Operational Parameters of Diesel Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mofijur, M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Hazrat, M.A. & Liaquat, A.M. & Shahabuddin, M. & Varman, M., 2012. "Prospects of biodiesel from Jatropha in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5007-5020.
    2. Takase, Mohammed & Zhao, Ting & Zhang, Min & Chen, Yao & Liu, Hongyang & Yang, Liuqing & Wu, Xiangyang, 2015. "An expatiate review of neem, jatropha, rubber and karanja as multipurpose non-edible biodiesel resources and comparison of their fuel, engine and emission properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 495-520.
    3. Banković-Ilić, Ivana B. & Stamenković, Olivera S. & Veljković, Vlada B., 2012. "Biodiesel production from non-edible plant oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3621-3647.
    4. Nongbe, Medy C. & Ekou, Tchirioua & Ekou, Lynda & Yao, Kouassi Benjamin & Le Grognec, Erwan & Felpin, François-Xavier, 2017. "Biodiesel production from palm oil using sulfonated graphene catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 135-141.
    5. Vadery, Vinu & Cherikkallinmel, Sudha Kochiyil & Ramakrishnan, Resmi M. & Sugunan, Sankaran & Narayanan, Binitha N., 2019. "Green production of biodiesel over waste borosilicate glass derived catalyst and the process up-gradation in pilot scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1042-1053.
    6. Mansir, Nasar & Teo, Siow Hwa & Rashid, Umer & Saiman, Mohd Izham & Tan, Yen Ping & Alsultan, G. Abdulkareem & Taufiq-Yap, Yun Hin, 2018. "Modified waste egg shell derived bifunctional catalyst for biodiesel production from high FFA waste cooking oil. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3645-3655.
    7. Silitonga, A.S. & Atabani, A.E. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H. & Badruddin, Irfan Anjum & Mekhilef, S., 2011. "A review on prospect of Jatropha curcas for biodiesel in Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3733-3756.
    8. Bhuiya, M.M.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Ashwath, N. & Azad, A.K., 2016. "Prospects of 2nd generation biodiesel as a sustainable fuel—Part: 1 selection of feedstocks, oil extraction techniques and conversion technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1109-1128.
    9. Xie, Wenlei & Li, Jiangbo, 2023. "Magnetic solid catalysts for sustainable and cleaner biodiesel production: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Abdullah, Sharifah Hanis Yasmin Sayid & Hanapi, Nur Hanis Mohamad & Azid, Azman & Umar, Roslan & Juahir, Hafizan & Khatoon, Helena & Endut, Azizah, 2017. "A review of biomass-derived heterogeneous catalyst for a sustainable biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1040-1051.
    11. Yatish, K.V. & Lalithamba, H.S. & Suresh, R. & Latha, H.K.E., 2020. "Ochrocarpus longifolius assisted green synthesis of CaTiO3 nanoparticle for biodiesel production and its kinetic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 310-321.
    12. Nitièma-Yefanova, Svitlana & Coniglio, Lucie & Schneider, Raphaël & Nébié, Roger H.C. & Bonzi-Coulibaly, Yvonne L., 2016. "Ethyl biodiesel production from non-edible oils of Balanites aegyptiaca, Azadirachta indica, and Jatropha curcas seeds – Laboratory scale development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 881-890.
    13. Papargyriou, Despoina & Broumidis, Emmanouil & de Vere-Tucker, Matthew & Gavrielides, Stelios & Hilditch, Paul & Irvine, John T.S. & Bonaccorso, Alfredo D., 2019. "Investigation of solid base catalysts for biodiesel production from fish oil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 661-669.
    14. Azad, A.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Sharma, Subhash C. & Hazrat, M.A., 2015. "Prospect of biofuels as an alternative transport fuel in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 331-351.
    15. Kanjaikaew, Utaiwan & Tongurai, Chakrit & Chongkhong, Sininart & Prasertsit, Kulchanat, 2018. "Two-step esterification of palm fatty acid distillate in ethyl ester production: Optimization and sensitivity analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 336-344.
    16. Christopher, Lew P. & Hemanathan Kumar, & Zambare, Vasudeo P., 2014. "Enzymatic biodiesel: Challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 497-520.
    17. S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & I. M. Rizwanul Fattah & Hwai Chyuan Ong & M. F. M. A. Zamri, 2021. "State-of-the-Art of Strategies to Reduce Exhaust Emissions from Diesel Engine Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Mahmudul, H.M. & Hagos, F.Y. & Mamat, R. & Adam, A. Abdul & Ishak, W.F.W. & Alenezi, R., 2017. "Production, characterization and performance of biodiesel as an alternative fuel in diesel engines – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 497-509.
    19. Mardhiah, H. Haziratul & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Masjuki, H.H. & Lim, Steven & Lee, H.V., 2017. "A review on latest developments and future prospects of heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production from non-edible oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1225-1236.
    20. Mofijur, M. & Rasul, M.G. & Hyde, J. & Azad, A.K. & Mamat, R. & Bhuiya, M.M.K., 2016. "Role of biofuel and their binary (diesel–biodiesel) and ternary (ethanol–biodiesel–diesel) blends on internal combustion engines emission reduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 265-278.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3916-:d:277023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.