IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i19p3691-d271193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Analysis of Waste Co-Combustion with Fossil Fuels Using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Pikoń

    (Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 18 Konarskiego Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Piotr Krawczyk

    (Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska Str., 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Badyda

    (Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska Str., 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Bogacka

    (Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 18 Konarskiego Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

The use of waste for energy purposes could become widespread and the radical lowering of the costs associated with that process could occur, if the resulting fuel did not have the status of waste. The key issue in removing the status of waste for a given substance is to eliminate the environmental impact of its use. Currently, there are no known fuels whose combustion does not lead to a negative impact on the environment, even to a minimum extent. It is therefore necessary to set a threshold of environmental impact at which we “recognize” a fuel to be harmless to the environment. The ecological impact of lignite was assumed in this text to be such a threshold. This paper proposes a methodology for determining the limit of environmental impact of fuel from waste. It also presents the results of our own research on the morphological and elemental composition of a waste mixture created by the separation of the over-screen fraction of municipal waste undesirable for a fuel, namely, chlorine carriers (PVC), multi-material waste, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, and non-combustible fractions (ash). The results obtained were used to assess the relative environmental impact of a waste mixture used as fuel.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Pikoń & Piotr Krawczyk & Krzysztof Badyda & Magdalena Bogacka, 2019. "Predictive Analysis of Waste Co-Combustion with Fossil Fuels Using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3691-:d:271193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3691/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3691/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Yuan & Huang, Runze & Ries, Robert J. & Masanet, Eric, 2015. "Life-cycle comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for coal and shale gas fired power generation in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 335-343.
    2. Fu, D.Z. & Zheng, Z.Y. & Shi, H.B. & Xiao, Rui & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.P., 2017. "A multi-fuel management model for a community-level district heating system under multiple uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 337-356.
    3. Corti, Andrea & Lombardi, Lidia, 2004. "Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle with reduced CO2 emissions: Performance analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2109-2124.
    4. Tabasová, Andrea & Kropáč, Jiří & Kermes, Vít & Nemet, Andreja & Stehlík, Petr, 2012. "Waste-to-energy technologies: Impact on environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 146-155.
    5. Stanek, Wojciech & Czarnowska, Lucyna & Pikoń, Krzysztof & Bogacka, Magdalena, 2015. "Thermo-ecological cost of hard coal with inclusion of the whole life cycle chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 341-348.
    6. Badyda, Krzysztof & Krawczyk, Piotr & Pikoń, Krzysztof, 2016. "Relative environmental footprint of waste-based fuel burned in a power boiler in the context of end-of-waste criteria assigned to the fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 425-430.
    7. Cherubini, Francesco & Bargigli, Silvia & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2009. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2116-2123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzysztof Pikoń & Waldemar Ścierski & Katarzyna Klejnowska & Łukasz Myćka & Anna Janoszka & Aleksander Sinek, 2021. "Determination of Fuel Properties of Char Obtained during the Pyrolysis of Waste Pharmaceutical Blisters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Katarzyna Klejnowska & Mateusz Sydow & Rafał Michalski & Magdalena Bogacka, 2022. "Life Cycle Impacts of Recycling of Black Mass Obtained from End-of-Life Zn-C and Alkaline Batteries Using Waelz Kiln," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Andrzej Jędrczak & Sylwia Myszograj & Jacek Połomka, 2020. "The Composition and Properties of Polish Waste Focused on Biostabilisation in MBT Plants during the Heating Season," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Nian, Victor, 2016. "Analysis of interconnecting energy systems over a synchronized life cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1024-1036.
    3. Lausselet, Carine & Cherubini, Francesco & Oreggioni, Gabriel David & del Alamo Serrano, Gonzalo & Becidan, Michael & Hu, Xiangping & Rørstad, Per Kr. & Strømman, Anders Hammer, 2017. "Norwegian Waste-to-Energy: Climate change, circular economy and carbon capture and storage," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 50-61.
    4. Sevigné Itoiz, E. & Gasol, C.M & Farreny, R. & Rieradevall, J. & Gabarrell, X., 2013. "CO2ZW: Carbon footprint tool for municipal solid waste management for policy options in Europe. Inventory of Mediterranean countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 623-632.
    5. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Stanek, Wojciech & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2018. "Thermo-ecological cost – Szargut's proposal on exergy and ecology connection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1050-1059.
    7. Zhou, Yuanchun & Ma, Mengdie & Gao, Peiqi & Xu, Qiming & Bi, Jun & Naren, Tuya, 2019. "Managing water resources from the energy - water nexus perspective under a changing climate: A case study of Jiangsu province, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 380-390.
    8. Wu, X.D. & Guo, J.L. & Chen, G.Q., 2018. "The striking amount of carbon emissions by the construction stage of coal-fired power generation system in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 358-369.
    9. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan & Azadi, Hossein & Van Passel, Steven & Saber, Zahra & Hosseini-Fashami, Fatemeh & Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh & Ghasemi-Mobtaker, Hassan, 2021. "Prospects of solar systems in production chain of sunflower oil using cold press method with concentrating energy and life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    11. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    12. Miranda, Miguel & Cabrita, I. & Pinto, Filomena & Gulyurtlu, I., 2013. "Mixtures of rubber tyre and plastic wastes pyrolysis: A kinetic study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 270-282.
    13. Agostinho, Feni & Almeida, Cecília M.V.B. & Bonilla, Silvia H. & Sacomano, José B. & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2013. "Urban solid waste plant treatment in Brazil: Is there a net emergy yield on the recovered materials?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 143-155.
    14. Jamie E. Filer & Justin D. Delorit & Andrew J. Hoisington & Steven J. Schuldt, 2020. "Optimizing the Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Remote Community Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    16. Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Zhang, Lixiao, 2013. "Modelling a thermodynamic-based comparative framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating economic and ecological losses into emergy analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 280-287.
    17. Grima-Olmedo, C. & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. & Alcalde-Cartagena, R., 2014. "Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 301-308.
    18. Hossein Nami & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Ahmad Arabkoohsar & Amir Reza Razmi, 2020. "4E Analyses of a Hybrid Waste-Driven CHP–ORC Plant with Flue Gas Condensation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Zhou, Zhongbing & Qin, Quande, 2020. "Epistemological dominance and ignorance of the comparative advantages of China's shale gas: Evidence from international scientific journals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Bhuyan, Satyanarayan & Hu, Junhui, 2013. "A natural battery based on lake water and its soil bank," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 395-399.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3691-:d:271193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.