IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i18p3476-d265538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Exergy Costs of Electrical Power, Cooling, and Waste Heat from a Hybrid System Based on a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and an Absorption Refrigeration System

Author

Listed:
  • V. H. Rangel-Hernandez

    (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52441 Jülich, Germany
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Guanajuato, Salamanca 36800, Mexico)

  • C. Torres

    (CIRCE Institute, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • A. Zaleta-Aguilar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Guanajuato, Salamanca 36800, Mexico)

  • M. A. Gomez-Martinez

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Guanajuato, Salamanca 36800, Mexico)

Abstract

This paper applies the Exergy Cost Theory (ECT) to a hybrid system based on a 500 kWe solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack and on a vapor-absorption refrigeration (VAR) system. To achieve this, a model comprised of chemical, electrochemical, thermodynamic, and thermoeconomic equations is developed using the software, Engineering Equation Solver (EES). The model is validated against previous works. This approach enables the unit exergy costs (electricity, cooling, and residues) to be computed by a productive structure defined by components, resources, products, and residues. Most importantly, it allows us to know the contribution of the environment and of the residues to the unit exergy cost of the product of the components. Finally, the simulation of different scenarios makes it possible to analyze the impact of stack current density, fuel use, temperature across the stack, and anode gas recirculation on the unit exergy costs of electrical power, cooling, and residues.

Suggested Citation

  • V. H. Rangel-Hernandez & C. Torres & A. Zaleta-Aguilar & M. A. Gomez-Martinez, 2019. "The Exergy Costs of Electrical Power, Cooling, and Waste Heat from a Hybrid System Based on a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and an Absorption Refrigeration System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3476-:d:265538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsatsaronis, Georgios & Winhold, Michael, 1985. "Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation of energy-conversion plants—I. A new general methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 69-80.
    2. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    3. Álvarez, Tomás & Valero, Antonio & Montes, José M., 2006. "Thermoeconomic analysis of a fuel cell hybrid power system from the fuel cell experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1358-1370.
    4. Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a system with biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 19-31.
    5. Torres, C. & Valero, A. & Rangel, V. & Zaleta, A., 2008. "On the cost formation process of the residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 144-152.
    6. Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell and Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 6-18.
    7. Shivarama Krishna, K. & Sathish Kumar, K., 2015. "A review on hybrid renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 907-916.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. César Torres & Antonio Valero, 2021. "The Exergy Cost Theory Revisited," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-42, March.
    2. Tian-Tian Li & Yun-Ze Li & Zhuang-Zhuang Zhai & En-Hui Li & Tong Li, 2019. "Energy-Saving Strategies and their Energy Analysis and Exergy Analysis for In Situ Thermal Remediation System of Polluted-Soil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Tomasz A. Prokop & Katarzyna Berent & Marcin Mozdzierz & Janusz S. Szmyd & Grzegorz Brus, 2019. "A Three-Dimensional Microstructure-Scale Simulation of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Anode—The Analysis of Stack Performance Enhancement After a Long-Term Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    2. Xing, Lei & Du, Shangfeng & Chen, Rui & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith, 2016. "Anode partial flooding modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Model development and validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 80-95.
    3. César Torres & Antonio Valero, 2021. "The Exergy Cost Theory Revisited," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-42, March.
    4. Xu, Haoran & Chen, Bin & Tan, Peng & Zhang, Houcheng & Yuan, Jinliang & Liu, Jiang & Ni, Meng, 2017. "Performance improvement of a direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell system by combining with a Stirling cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 979-987.
    5. Piacentino, Antonio & Cardona, Fabio, 2010. "Scope-Oriented Thermoeconomic analysis of energy systems. Part I: Looking for a non-postulated cost accounting for the dissipative devices of a vapour compression chiller. Is it feasible?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 943-956, March.
    6. Luo, Xianglong & Hu, Jiahao & Zhao, Jun & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2014. "Improved exergoeconomic analysis of a retrofitted natural gas-based cogeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 459-475.
    7. Yang, Hang-Suin & Zhu, Hao-Qiang & Xiao, Xian-Zhong, 2023. "Comparison of the dynamic characteristics and performance of beta-type Stirling engines operating with different driving mechanisms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Majidniya, Mahdi & Remy, Benjamin & Boileau, Thierry & Zandi, Majid, 2021. "Free Piston Stirling Engine as a new heat recovery option for an Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1188-1201.
    9. Kanbur, Baris Burak & Xiang, Liming & Dubey, Swapnil & Choo, Fook Hoong & Duan, Fei, 2017. "Thermoeconomic and environmental assessments of a combined cycle for the small scale LNG cold utilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1148-1162.
    10. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    11. Wang, Jiangjiang & Mao, Tianzhi & Wu, Jing, 2017. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling and analysis of combined cooling heating and power system integrated with biomass-steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 871-882.
    12. Casas Ledón, Yannay & González, Patricia & Concha, Scarlett & Zaror, Claudio A. & Arteaga-Pérez, Luis E., 2016. "Exergoeconomic valuation of a waste-based integrated combined cycle (WICC) for heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 239-252.
    13. Valero, Antonio & Usón, Sergio & Torres, César & Valero, Alicia & Agudelo, Andrés & Costa, Jorge, 2013. "Thermoeconomic tools for the analysis of eco-industrial parks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 62-72.
    14. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    15. Kanbur, Baris Burak & Xiang, Liming & Dubey, Swapnil & Choo, Fook Hoong & Duan, Fei, 2018. "Finite sum based thermoeconomic and sustainable analyses of the small scale LNG cold utilized power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 944-961.
    16. Wang, Yuan & Cai, Ling & Liu, Tie & Wang, Junyi & Chen, Jincan, 2015. "An efficient strategy exploiting the waste heat in a solid oxide fuel cell system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 900-907.
    17. Wang, Heng & Zhao, Hongbin & Du, Huicheng & Zhao, Zefeng & Zhang, Taiheng, 2022. "Thermodynamic performance study of a new diesel-fueled CLHG/SOFC/STIG cogeneration system with CO2 recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Usón, Sergio & Stanek, Wojciech & Bargiel, Paweł, 2014. "Thermoecological cost of electricity production in the natural gas pressure reduction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 10-18.
    19. Antonio Valero & César Torres, 2020. "Relative Free Energy Function and Structural Theory of Thermoeconomics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    20. dos Santos, Kenia Gabriela & Eckert, Caroline Thaís & De Rossi, Eduardo & Bariccatti, Reinaldo Aparecido & Frigo, Elisandro Pires & Lindino, Cleber Antonio & Alves, Helton José, 2017. "Hydrogen production in the electrolysis of water in Brazil, a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 563-571.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3476-:d:265538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.