IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i17p3290-d261179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Turbulence Models in Simulating Wind Loads on Photovoltaics Modules

Author

Listed:
  • Mireille B. Tadie Fogaing

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Arman Hemmati

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Carlos F. Lange

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Brian A. Fleck

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

Abstract

The performance of five conventional turbulence models, commonly used in the wind industry, are examined in predicting the complex wake of an infinite span thin normal flat plate with large pressure gradients at Reynolds number of 1200. This body represents a large array of Photovoltaics modules, where two edges of the plate dominate the flow. This study provided a benchmark for capabilities of conventional turbulence models that are commonly used for wind forecasting in the wind energy industry. The results obtained from Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) k - ε , Reynolds Normalization Group (RNG) k - ε , RANS k - ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) and Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) were compared with existing Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS). The mean flow features and unsteady wake characteristics were used as testing criteria amongst these models. All turbulence models over-predicted the mean recirculation length and under-predicted the mean drag coefficient. The major differences between numerical results in predicting the mean recirculation length, mean drag and velocity gradients, leading to deficits in turbulence kinetic energy production and diffusion, hint at major difficulties in modeling velocity gradients and thus turbulence energy transport terms, by traditional turbulence models. Unsteadiness of flow physics and nature of eddy viscosity approximations are potential reasons. This hints at the deficiencies of these models to predict complex flows with large pressure gradients, which are commonly observed in wind and solar farms. The under-prediction of wind loads on PV modules and over-estimation of the recirculation length behind them significantly affects the efficiency and operational feasibility of solar energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mireille B. Tadie Fogaing & Arman Hemmati & Carlos F. Lange & Brian A. Fleck, 2019. "Performance of Turbulence Models in Simulating Wind Loads on Photovoltaics Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3290-:d:261179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Libra & Milan Daneček & Jan Lešetický & Vladislav Poulek & Jan Sedláček & Václav Beránek, 2019. "Monitoring of Defects of a Photovoltaic Power Plant Using a Drone," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Xavier Ortiz & David Rival & David Wood, 2015. "Forces and Moments on Flat Plates of Small Aspect Ratio with Application to PV Wind Loads and Small Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Abiola-Ogedengbe, Ayodeji & Hangan, Horia & Siddiqui, Kamran, 2015. "Experimental investigation of wind effects on a standalone photovoltaic (PV) module," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 657-665.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alireza Eslami Majd & David S. Adebayo & Fideline Tchuenbou-Magaia & James Willetts & Dave Nwosu & Zackery Matthews & Nduka Nnamdi Ekere, 2024. "Wind Flow and Its Interaction with a Mobile Solar PV System Mounted on a Trailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Mladen Bošnjaković & Marinko Stojkov & Marko Katinić & Ivica Lacković, 2023. "Effects of Extreme Weather Conditions on PV Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Castellani & Abdelgalil Eltayesh & Francesco Natili & Tommaso Tocci & Matteo Becchetti & Lorenzo Capponi & Davide Astolfi & Gianluca Rossi, 2021. "Wind Flow Characterisation over a PV Module through URANS Simulations and Wind Tunnel Optical Flow Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Mammar, Mohamed & Djouimaa, Sihem & Gärtner, Ulrich & Hamidat, Abderrahmane, 2018. "Wind loads on heliostats of various column heights: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 867-880.
    3. Mahmoud Dhimish & Pavlos I. Lazaridis, 2022. "Approximating Shading Ratio Using the Total-Sky Imaging System: An Application for Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Jianfeng Yao & Zhibin Tu & Dong Wang & Guohui Shen & Wenjuan Lou, 2022. "Experimental Investigation of Wind Loads on Roof-Mounted Solar Arrays," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Jangyoul You & Myungkwan Lim & Kipyo You & Changhee Lee, 2021. "Wind Coefficient Distribution of Arranged Ground Photovoltaic Panels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Thiago B. Murari & Aloisio S. Nascimento Filho & Marcelo A. Moret & Sergio Pitombo & Alex A. B. Santos, 2020. "Self-Affine Analysis of ENSO in Solar Radiation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Chiteka, Kudzanayi & Arora, Rajesh & Sridhara, S.N. & Enweremadu, C.C., 2021. "Influence of irradiance incidence angle and installation configuration on the deposition of dust and dust-shading of a photovoltaic array," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Jianfeng Yao & Zhibin Tu & Dong Wang & Guohui Shen & Shice Yu & Wenjuan Lou, 2023. "Experimental Investigation of the Parapet Effect on the Wind Load of Roof-Mounted Solar Arrays," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Pavel Kuznetsov & Dmitry Kotelnikov & Leonid Yuferev & Vladimir Panchenko & Vadim Bolshev & Marek Jasiński & Aymen Flah, 2022. "Method for the Automated Inspection of the Surfaces of Photovoltaic Modules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Chiteka, Kudzanayi & Arora, Rajesh & Sridhara, S.N. & Enweremadu, C.C., 2021. "Optimizing wind barrier and photovoltaic array configuration in soiling mitigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 225-236.
    11. Raillani, Benyounes & Salhi, Mourad & Chaatouf, Dounia & Bria, Abir & Amraqui, Samir & Mezrhab, Ahmed, 2023. "A new proposed method to mitigate the soiling rate of a photovoltaic array using first-row height," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    12. Şevik, Seyfi & Aktaş, Ahmet, 2022. "Performance enhancing and improvement studies in a 600 kW solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant; manual and natural cleaning, rainwater harvesting and the snow load removal on the PV arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 490-503.
    13. Ustun, Taha Selim & Nakamura, Yasuhiro & Hashimoto, Jun & Otani, Kenji, 2019. "Performance analysis of PV panels based on different technologies after two years of outdoor exposure in Fukushima, Japan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 159-178.
    14. Di Tommaso, Antonio & Betti, Alessandro & Fontanelli, Giacomo & Michelozzi, Benedetto, 2022. "A multi-stage model based on YOLOv3 for defect detection in PV panels based on IR and visible imaging by unmanned aerial vehicle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 941-962.
    15. Zhibin Tu & Gensheng Zheng & Jianfeng Yao & Guohui Shen & Wenjuan Lou, 2022. "Computational Investigation of Wind Loads on Tilted Roof-Mounted Solar Array," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Ceylan, İlhan & Yilmaz, Sezayi & İnanç, Özgür & Ergün, Alper & Gürel, Ali Etem & Acar, Bahadır & İlker Aksu, Ali, 2019. "Determination of the heat transfer coefficient of PV panels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 978-985.
    17. Salah Ud-Din Khan & Irfan Wazeer & Zeyad Almutairi, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of SAM and RETScreen Tools for the Case Study of 600 kW Solar PV System Installation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Youngjin Choi & Yangrok Choi & Jun-sang Cho & Dongwoo Kim & Jungsik Kong, 2023. "Utilization and Verification of Imaging Technology in Smart Bridge Inspection System: An Application Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-31, January.
    19. Mohammad Abdul Baseer & Venkatesan Vinoth Kumar & Ivan Izonin & Ivanna Dronyuk & Athyoor Kannan Velmurugan & Babu Swapna, 2023. "Novel Hybrid Optimization Techniques to Enhance Reliability from Reverse Osmosis Desalination Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Odysseas Tsafarakis & Kostas Sinapis & Wilfried G. J. H. M. van Sark, 2019. "A Time-Series Data Analysis Methodology for Effective Monitoring of Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3290-:d:261179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.