IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2018i1p42-d192874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of CO 2 Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection in Shale Gas Condensate Reservoirs

Author

Listed:
  • Xingbang Meng

    (Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266000, China)

  • Zhan Meng

    (Petroleum Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 042, Canada)

  • Jixiang Ma

    (PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, China)

  • Tengfei Wang

    (Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266000, China)

Abstract

When the reservoir pressure is decreased lower than the dew point pressure in shale gas condensate reservoirs, condensate would be formed in the formation. Condensate accumulation severely reduces the commercial production of shale gas condensate reservoirs. Seeking ways to mitigate condensate in the formation and enhance both condensate and gas recovery in shale reservoirs has important significance. Very few related studies have been done. In this paper, both experimental and numerical studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of CO 2 huff-n-puff to enhance the condensate recovery in shale reservoirs. Experimentally, CO 2 huff-n-puff tests on shale core were conducted. A theoretical field scale simulation model was constructed. The effects of injection pressure, injection time, and soaking time on the efficiency of CO 2 huff-n-puff were examined. Experimental results indicate that condensate recovery was enhanced to 30.36% after 5 cycles of CO 2 huff-n-puff. In addition, simulation results indicate that the injection period and injection pressure should be optimized to ensure that the pressure of the main condensate region remains higher than the dew point pressure. The soaking process should be determined based on the injection pressure. This work may shed light on a better understanding of the CO 2 huff-n-puff- enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategy in shale gas condensate reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingbang Meng & Zhan Meng & Jixiang Ma & Tengfei Wang, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of CO 2 Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection in Shale Gas Condensate Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:42-:d:192874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/1/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/1/42/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuloaga, Pavel & Yu, Wei & Miao, Jijun & Sepehrnoori, Kamy, 2017. "Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 181-192.
    2. Ren, Bo & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang & Chen, Guoli & Zhang, Hua, 2016. "Monitoring on CO2 migration in a tight oil reservoir during CCS-EOR in Jilin Oilfield China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Mehana & Qinjun Kang & Hari Viswanathan, 2020. "Molecular-Scale Considerations of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kun Qian & Shenglai Yang & Hongen Dou & Qian Wang & Lu Wang & Yu Huang, 2018. "Experimental Investigation on Microscopic Residual Oil Distribution During CO 2 Huff-and-Puff Process in Tight Oil Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Zhang, Xiang & Wei, Bing & You, Junyu & Liu, Jiang & Wang, Dianlin & Lu, Jun & Tong, Jing, 2021. "Characterizing pore-level oil mobilization processes in unconventional reservoirs assisted by state-of-the-art nuclear magnetic resonance technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2019. "Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO2 EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 391-401.
    4. Wang, Lele & Wei, Bing & You, Junyu & Pu, Wanfen & Tang, Jinyu & Lu, Jun, 2023. "Performance of a tight reservoir horizontal well induced by gas huff–n–puff integrating fracture geometry, rock stress-sensitivity and molecular diffusion: A case study using CO2, N2 and produced gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    5. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2017. "Demonstrating sustainable energy: A review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1349-1362.
    6. Fengshuang Du & Bahareh Nojabaei, 2019. "A Review of Gas Injection in Shale Reservoirs: Enhanced Oil/Gas Recovery Approaches and Greenhouse Gas Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, June.
    7. Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh J., 2019. "Characterization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in residual oil zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 291-304.
    8. Cheng Cao & Hejuan Liu & Zhengmeng Hou & Faisal Mehmood & Jianxing Liao & Wentao Feng, 2020. "A Review of CO 2 Storage in View of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-45, January.
    9. Hao, Yongmao & Li, Zongfa & Su, Yuliang & Kong, Chuixian & Chen, Hong & Meng, Yang, 2022. "Experimental investigation of CO2 storage and oil production of different CO2 injection methods at pore-scale and core-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    10. Zuloaga, Pavel & Yu, Wei & Miao, Jijun & Sepehrnoori, Kamy, 2017. "Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 181-192.
    11. Yuan Zhang & Yuan Di & Yang Shi & Jinghong Hu, 2018. "Cyclic CH 4 Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Eagle Ford Shale Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Wei, Bo & He, Xiaobiao & Li, Xin & Ju, Yiwen & Jin, Jun & Luo, Qiang, 2023. "Residual oil contents of dolomicrite and sandy dolomite tight oil reservoirs after CO2 huff and puff: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    13. Rui Song & Ping Zhang & Xiaomin Tian & Famu Huang & Zhiwen Li & Jianjun Liu, 2022. "Study on Critical Drawdown Pressure of Sanding for Wellbore of Underground Gas Storage in a Depleted Gas Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Yuan Zhang & Jinghong Hu & Qi Zhang, 2019. "Simulation Study of CO 2 Huff-n-Puff in Tight Oil Reservoirs Considering Molecular Diffusion and Adsorption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Cai, Mingyu & Su, Yuliang & Elsworth, Derek & Li, Lei & Fan, Liyao, 2021. "Hydro-mechanical-chemical modeling of sub-nanopore capillary-confinement on CO2-CCUS-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Rahmad Syah & Seyed Mehdi Alizadeh & Karina Shamilyevna Nurgalieva & John William Grimaldo Guerrero & Mahyuddin K. M. Nasution & Afshin Davarpanah & Dadan Ramdan & Ahmed Sayed M. Metwally, 2021. "A Laboratory Approach to Measure Enhanced Gas Recovery from a Tight Gas Reservoir during Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Junrong Liu & Lu Sun & Zunzhao Li & Xingru Wu, 2019. "Experimental Study on Reducing CO 2 –Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure with Hydrocarbon Agents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Cheng, Jianmei & Ding, Zhaojing & Wang, Dandan & Jing, Xianwen, 2023. "Analysis of the effect of formation dip angle and injection pressure on the injectivity and migration of CO2 during storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    20. Lingbin Meng & Jing Zheng & Ruizhao Yang & Suping Peng & Yuan Sun & Jingyu Xie & Dewei Li, 2023. "Microseismic Monitoring Technology Developments and Prospects in CCUS Injection Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:42-:d:192874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.