IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i8p2155-d164336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Demand-Side Management on the Reliability of Generation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Hussein Jumma Jabir

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia
    Inspector General Office, Ministry of Water Resources, Filastin 10046, Baghdad, Iraq)

  • Jiashen Teh

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Dahaman Ishak

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Hamza Abunima

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

Abstract

The load shifting strategy is a form of demand side management program suitable for increasing the reliability of power supply in an electrical network. It functions by clipping the load demand that is above an operator-defined level, at which time is known as peak period, and replaces it at off-peak periods. The load shifting strategy is conventionally performed using the preventive load shifting (PLS) program. In this paper, the corrective load shifting (CLS) program is proven as the better alternative. PLS is implemented when power systems experience contingencies that jeopardise the reliability of the power supply, whereas CLS is implemented only when the inadequacy of the power supply is encountered. The disadvantages of the PLS approach are twofold. First, the clipped energy cannot be totally recovered when it is more than the unused capacity of the off-peak period. The unused capacity is the maximum amount of extra load that can be filled before exceeding the operator-defined level. Second, the PLS approach performs load curtailment without discrimination. This means that load clipping is performed as long as the load is above the operator-defined level even if the power supply is adequate. The CLS program has none of these disadvantages because it is implemented only when there is power supply inadequacy, during which the amount of load clipping is mostly much smaller than the unused capacity of the off-peak period. The performance of the CLS was compared with the PLS by considering chronological load model, duty cycle and the probability of start-up failure for peaking and cycling generators, planned maintenance of the generators and load forecast uncertainty. A newly proposed expected-energy-not-recovered (EENR) index and the well-known expected-energy-not-supplied (EENS) were used to evaluate the performance of proposed CLS. Due to the chronological factor and huge combinations of power system states, the sequential Monte Carlo was employed in this study. The results from this paper show that the proposed CLS yields lower EENS and EENR than PLS and is, therefore, a more robust strategy to be implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Hussein Jumma Jabir & Jiashen Teh & Dahaman Ishak & Hamza Abunima, 2018. "Impact of Demand-Side Management on the Reliability of Generation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2155-:d:164336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2155/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2155/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hussein Jumma Jabir & Jiashen Teh & Dahaman Ishak & Hamza Abunima, 2018. "Impacts of Demand-Side Management on Electrical Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Malik, Arif S, 1999. "Dynamic generating costs in DSM planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-8.
    3. Karunanithi, K. & Saravanan, S. & Prabakar, B.R. & Kannan, S. & Thangaraj, C., 2017. "Integration of Demand and Supply Side Management strategies in Generation Expansion Planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 966-982.
    4. Jiashen Teh & Chia Ai Ooi & Yu-Huei Cheng & Muhammad Ammirrul Atiqi Mohd Zainuri & Ching-Ming Lai, 2018. "Composite Reliability Evaluation of Load Demand Side Management and Dynamic Thermal Rating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasileios M. Laitsos & Dimitrios Bargiotas & Aspassia Daskalopulu & Athanasios Ioannis Arvanitidis & Lefteri H. Tsoukalas, 2021. "An Incentive-Based Implementation of Demand Side Management in Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Yuriy Leonidovich Zhukovskiy & Margarita Sergeevna Kovalchuk & Daria Evgenievna Batueva & Nikita Dmitrievich Senchilo, 2021. "Development of an Algorithm for Regulating the Load Schedule of Educational Institutions Based on the Forecast of Electric Consumption within the Framework of Application of the Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Alessandro Niccolai & Gaia Gianna Taje & Davide Mosca & Fabrizio Trombello & Emanuele Ogliari, 2022. "Industrial Demand-Side Management by Means of Differential Evolution Considering Energy Price and Labour Cost," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Tengfei Ma & Junyong Wu & Liangliang Hao & Huaguang Yan & Dezhi Li, 2018. "A Real-Time Pricing Scheme for Energy Management in Integrated Energy Systems: A Stackelberg Game Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Rajavelu Dharani & Madasamy Balasubramonian & Thanikanti Sudhakar Babu & Benedetto Nastasi, 2021. "Load Shifting and Peak Clipping for Reducing Energy Consumption in an Indian University Campus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Konstantinos Fiorentzis & Antonios Tsikalakis & Emmanuel Karapidakis & Yiannis Katsigiannis & George Stavrakakis, 2019. "Improving Reliability Indices of the Autonomous Power System of Crete Island Utilizing Extended Photovoltaic Installations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Hamza Abunima & Jiashen Teh & Ching-Ming Lai & Hussein Jumma Jabir, 2018. "A Systematic Review of Reliability Studies on Composite Power Systems: A Coherent Taxonomy Motivations, Open Challenges, Recommendations, and New Research Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    8. Mayank Singh & Rakesh Chandra Jha, 2019. "Object-Oriented Usability Indices for Multi-Objective Demand Side Management Using Teaching-Learning Based Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Eunsung Oh, 2022. "Fair Virtual Energy Storage System Operation for Smart Energy Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Jiashen Teh, 2018. "Adequacy Assessment of Wind Integrated Generating Systems Incorporating Demand Response and Battery Energy Storage System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Mohamad, Farihan & Teh, Jiashen & Lai, Ching-Ming, 2021. "Optimum allocation of battery energy storage systems for power grid enhanced with solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ussama Assad & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Umar Farooq & Asif Kabir & Muhammad Zeeshan Khan & S. Sabahat H. Bukhari & Zain ul Abidin Jaffri & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2022. "Smart Grid, Demand Response and Optimization: A Critical Review of Computational Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-36, March.
    2. Jiashen Teh, 2018. "Adequacy Assessment of Wind Integrated Generating Systems Incorporating Demand Response and Battery Energy Storage System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Hussein Jumma Jabir & Jiashen Teh & Dahaman Ishak & Hamza Abunima, 2018. "Impacts of Demand-Side Management on Electrical Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Mohamad, Farihan & Teh, Jiashen & Lai, Ching-Ming, 2021. "Optimum allocation of battery energy storage systems for power grid enhanced with solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Ovidiu Ivanov & Samiran Chattopadhyay & Soumya Banerjee & Bogdan-Constantin Neagu & Gheorghe Grigoras & Mihai Gavrilas, 2020. "A Novel Algorithm with Multiple Consumer Demand Response Priorities in Residential Unbalanced LV Electricity Distribution Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Antans Sauhats & Andrejs Utans & Jurijs Silinevics & Gatis Junghans & Dmitrijs Guzs, 2021. "Enhancing Power System Frequency with a Novel Load Shedding Method Including Monitoring of Synchronous Condensers’ Power Injections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Bernadeta Gołębiowska & Anna Bartczak & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2020. "Energy Demand Management and Social Norms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Solaymani, Saeed, 2019. "CO2 emissions patterns in 7 top carbon emitter economies: The case of transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 989-1001.
    9. Arjuna Nebel & Christine Krüger & Tomke Janßen & Mathieu Saurat & Sebastian Kiefer & Karin Arnold, 2020. "Comparison of the Effects of Industrial Demand Side Management and Other Flexibilities on the Performance of the Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Hong, Jun & Johnstone, Cameron & Torriti, Jacopo & Leach, Matthew, 2012. "Discrete demand side control performance under dynamic building simulation: A heat pump application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 85-95.
    11. Rodgers, Mark & Coit, David & Felder, Frank & Carlton, Annmarie, 2019. "Assessing the effects of power grid expansion on human health externalities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 92-104.
    12. Gul, Eid & Baldinelli, Giorgio & Bartocci, Pietro & Shamim, Tariq & Domenighini, Piergiovanni & Cotana, Franco & Wang, Jinwen & Fantozzi, Francesco & Bianchi, Francesco, 2023. "Transition toward net zero emissions - Integration and optimization of renewable energy sources: Solar, hydro, and biomass with the local grid station in central Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 672-686.
    13. Arteconi, A. & Hewitt, N.J. & Polonara, F., 2012. "State of the art of thermal storage for demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 371-389.
    14. Yuriy Leonidovich Zhukovskiy & Margarita Sergeevna Kovalchuk & Daria Evgenievna Batueva & Nikita Dmitrievich Senchilo, 2021. "Development of an Algorithm for Regulating the Load Schedule of Educational Institutions Based on the Forecast of Electric Consumption within the Framework of Application of the Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Pinto, Giuseppe & Deltetto, Davide & Capozzoli, Alfonso, 2021. "Data-driven district energy management with surrogate models and deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    16. Pinheiro, Marco G. & Madeira, Sara C. & Francisco, Alexandre P., 2023. "Short-term electricity load forecasting—A systematic approach from system level to secondary substations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    17. Nilton Bispo Amado & Erick Del Bianco Pelegia & Ildo Luís Sauer, 2021. "Capacity Value from Wind and Solar Sources in Systems with Variable Dispatchable Capacity—An Application in the Brazilian Hydrothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Eunsung Oh, 2022. "Fair Virtual Energy Storage System Operation for Smart Energy Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Siavash Asiaban & Nezmin Kayedpour & Arash E. Samani & Dimitar Bozalakov & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Guillaume Crevecoeur & Lieven Vandevelde, 2021. "Wind and Solar Intermittency and the Associated Integration Challenges: A Comprehensive Review Including the Status in the Belgian Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-41, May.
    20. Chen-Yu Chang & Pei-Fang Tsai, 2022. "Multiobjective Decision-Making Model for Power Scheduling Problem in Smart Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2155-:d:164336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.