IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i7p1679-d154841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Honeycomb Methanation Catalyst and Its Application in Power to Gas Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Biegger

    (Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Chair of Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria)

  • Florian Kirchbacher

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Ana Roza Medved

    (Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Chair of Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria)

  • Martin Miltner

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Markus Lehner

    (Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Chair of Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria)

  • Michael Harasek

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Fluctuating energy sources require enhanced energy storage demand, in order to ensure safe energy supply. Power to gas offers a promising pathway for energy storage in existing natural gas infrastructure, if valid regulations are met. To improve interaction between energy supply and storage, a flexible power to gas process is necessary. An innovative multibed methanation concept, based on ceramic honeycomb catalysts combined with polyimide membrane gas upgrading, is presented in this study. Cordierite monoliths are coated with γ -Al 2 O 3 and catalytically active nickel, and used in a two-stage methanation process at different operation conditions ( p = 6–14 bar, GHSV = 3000–6000 h −1 ). To fulfill the requirements of the Austrian natural gas network, the product gas must achieve a CH 4 content of ≥96 vol %. Hence, CH 4 rich gas from methanation is fed to the subsequent gas upgrading unit, to separate remaining H 2 and CO 2 . In the present study, two different membrane modules were investigated. The results of methanation and gas separation clearly indicate the high potential of the presented process. At preferred operation conditions, target concentration of 96 vol % CH 4 can be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Biegger & Florian Kirchbacher & Ana Roza Medved & Martin Miltner & Markus Lehner & Michael Harasek, 2018. "Development of Honeycomb Methanation Catalyst and Its Application in Power to Gas Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1679-:d:154841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirchbacher, Florian & Biegger, Philipp & Miltner, Martin & Lehner, Markus & Harasek, Michael, 2018. "A new methanation and membrane based power-to-gas process for the direct integration of raw biogas – Feasability and comparison," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 34-46.
    2. Scholz, Marco & Melin, Thomas & Wessling, Matthias, 2013. "Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 199-212.
    3. Collet, Pierre & Flottes, Eglantine & Favre, Alain & Raynal, Ludovic & Pierre, Hélène & Capela, Sandra & Peregrina, Carlos, 2017. "Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 282-295.
    4. Sun, Qie & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinying & Liu, Longcheng & Yu, Zhixin & Yu, Xinhai, 2015. "Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 521-532.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philipp Wolf-Zoellner & Ana Roza Medved & Markus Lehner & Nina Kieberger & Katharina Rechberger, 2021. "In Situ Catalytic Methanation of Real Steelworks Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Saman Setoodeh Jahromy & Felix Birkelbach & Christian Jordan & Clemens Huber & Michael Harasek & Andreas Werner & Franz Winter, 2019. "Impact of Partial Pressure, Conversion, and Temperature on the Oxidation Reaction Kinetics of Cu 2 O to CuO in Thermochemical Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Sayama, Shogo & Yamamoto, Seiji, 2022. "A 6-kW thermally self-sustained two-stage CO2 methanation reactor: design and experimental evaluation of steady-state performance under full-load conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    4. Jing Liu & Wei Sun & Gareth P. Harrison, 2019. "Optimal Low-Carbon Economic Environmental Dispatch of Hybrid Electricity-Natural Gas Energy Systems Considering P2G," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Kirchbacher, F. & Miltner, M. & Wukovits, W. & Harasek, M., 2019. "Economic assessment of membrane-based power-to-gas processes for the European biogas market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 338-352.
    3. Muhamed Rasit Atelge & Halil Senol & Mohammed Djaafri & Tulin Avci Hansu & David Krisa & Abdulaziz Atabani & Cigdem Eskicioglu & Hamdi Muratçobanoğlu & Sebahattin Unalan & Slimane Kalloum & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-39, October.
    4. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    6. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Witte, Julia & Calbry-Muzyka, Adelaide & Wieseler, Tanja & Hottinger, Peter & Biollaz, Serge M.A. & Schildhauer, Tilman J., 2019. "Demonstrating direct methanation of real biogas in a fluidised bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 359-371.
    8. Sánchez, Antonio Santos & Silva, Yuri Lopes & Kalid, Ricardo Araújo & Cohim, Eduardo & Torres, Ednildo Andrade, 2017. "Waste bio-refineries for the cassava starch industry: New trends and review of alternatives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1265-1275.
    9. Ardolino, F. & Cardamone, G.F. & Parrillo, F. & Arena, U., 2021. "Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    12. Gong, Huijuan & Chen, Zezhi & Yu, Huiqiang & Wu, Weili & Wang, Weixing & Pang, Honglei & Du, Mengfan, 2018. "Methane recovery in a combined amine absorption and gas steam boiler as a self-provided system for biogas upgrading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 744-751.
    13. Moioli, Emanuele & Schildhauer, Tilman, 2022. "Negative CO2 emissions from flexible biofuel synthesis: Concepts, potentials, technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Ghafoori, Mohammad Samim & Loubar, Khaled & Marin-Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand, 2022. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of biomethane production via landfill biogas upgrading and power-to-gas technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    15. R. C. Assunção, Lorena & A. S. Mendes, Pietro & Matos, Stelvia & Borschiver, Suzana, 2021. "Technology roadmap of renewable natural gas: Identifying trends for research and development to improve biogas upgrading technology management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    16. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Qadeer, Kinza & Valentina, Valentina & Khan, Amin & Yasin, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & De Guido, Giorgia & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2020. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane: Assessment of 3P's–Production, processing, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Eric Santos-Clotas & Alba Cabrera-Codony & Alba Castillo & Maria J. Martín & Manel Poch & Hèctor Monclús, 2019. "Environmental Decision Support System for Biogas Upgrading to Feasible Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Vo, Truc T.Q. & Wall, David M. & Ring, Denis & Rajendran, Karthik & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of biogas upgrading via amine scrubber, carbon capture and ex-situ methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1191-1202.
    19. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & de Santoli, Livio, 2022. "Can the renewable energy share increase in electricity and gas grids takes out the competitiveness of gas-driven CHP plants for distributed generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    20. Brigagão, George Victor & Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda & Pinto, Juliana Leite & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Upstream and downstream processing of microalgal biogas: Emissions, energy and economic performances under carbon taxation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 508-520.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1679-:d:154841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.