IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i4p466-d94799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fatigue Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbine Cast Components

Author

Listed:
  • Hesam Mirzaei Rafsanjani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark)

  • John Dalsgaard Sørensen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark)

  • Søren Fæster

    (Department of Wind Energy, Technical University Denmark, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark)

  • Asger Sturlason

    (Vestas Technology & Service Solutions, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark)

Abstract

The fatigue life of wind turbine cast components, such as the main shaft in a drivetrain, is generally determined by defects from the casting process. These defects may reduce the fatigue life and they are generally distributed randomly in components. The foundries, cutting facilities and test facilities can affect the verification of properties by testing. Hence, it is important to have a tool to identify which foundry, cutting and/or test facility produces components which, based on the relevant uncertainties, have the largest expected fatigue life or, alternatively, have the largest reliability to be used for decision-making if additional cost considerations are added. In this paper, a statistical approach is presented based on statistical hypothesis testing and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) which can be applied to compare different groups (manufacturers, suppliers, test facilities, etc.) and to quantify the relevant uncertainties using available fatigue tests. Illustrative results are presented as obtained by statistical analysis of a large set of fatigue data for casted test components typically used for wind turbines. Furthermore, the SN curves (fatigue life curves based on applied stress) for fatigue assessment are estimated based on the statistical analyses and by introduction of physical, model and statistical uncertainties used for the illustration of reliability assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Hesam Mirzaei Rafsanjani & John Dalsgaard Sørensen & Søren Fæster & Asger Sturlason, 2017. "Fatigue Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbine Cast Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:466-:d:94799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/466/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/466/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hesam Mirzaei Rafsanjani & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2015. "Reliability Analysis of Fatigue Failure of Cast Components for Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. John D. Sørensen & Henrik S. Toft, 2010. "Probabilistic Design of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Donald W. Zimmerman, 1997. "Teacher’s Corner: A Note on Interpretation of the Paired-Samples t Test," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 22(3), pages 349-360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liao, Ding & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Correia, José A.F.O. & De Jesus, Abílio M.P. & Veljkovic, Milan & Berto, Filippo, 2022. "Fatigue reliability of wind turbines: historical perspectives, recent developments and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 724-742.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiyu Jiang & Weifei Hu & Wenbin Dong & Zhen Gao & Zhengru Ren, 2017. "Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Liao, Ding & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Correia, José A.F.O. & De Jesus, Abílio M.P. & Veljkovic, Milan & Berto, Filippo, 2022. "Fatigue reliability of wind turbines: historical perspectives, recent developments and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 724-742.
    3. Nancy, Jane Y. & Khanna, Nehemiah H. & Arputharaj, Kannan, 2017. "Imputing missing values in unevenly spaced clinical time series data to build an effective temporal classification framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 63-79.
    4. Liu, Min & Qin, Jianjun & Lu, Da-Gang & Zhang, Wei-Heng & Zhu, Jiang-Sheng & Faber, Michael Havbro, 2022. "Towards resilience of offshore wind farms: A framework and application to asset integrity management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    5. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Jianjun Qin & Michael Havbro Faber, 2019. "Resilience Informed Integrity Management of Wind Turbine Parks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    8. Michael Muskulus, 2015. "Pareto-Optimal Evaluation of Ultimate Limit States in Offshore Wind Turbine Structural Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Ahmet Selim Pehlivan & Mahmut Faruk Aksit & Kemalettin Erbatur, 2021. "Fatigue Analysis Design Approach, Manufacturing and Implementation of a 500 kW Wind Turbine Main Load Frame," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Kostandyan, Erik E. & Sørensen, John D., 2012. "Physics of failure as a basis for solder elements reliability assessment in wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 100-107.
    11. Wilkie, David & Galasso, Carmine, 2020. "A probabilistic framework for offshore wind turbine loss assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1772-1783.
    12. Neeraj Bokde & Andrés Feijóo & Daniel Villanueva & Kishore Kulat, 2019. "A Review on Hybrid Empirical Mode Decomposition Models for Wind Speed and Wind Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-42, January.
    13. Ramezani, Mahyar & Choe, Do-Eun & Heydarpour, Khashayar & Koo, Bonjun, 2023. "Uncertainty models for the structural design of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. Huang, Yangguang, 2019. "An empirical study of scoring auctions and quality manipulation corruption," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Lahmiri, Salim, 2018. "Generalized Hurst exponent estimates differentiate EEG signals of healthy and epileptic patients," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 378-385.
    16. Qin, Mengfei & Shi, Wei & Chai, Wei & Fu, Xing & Li, Lin & Li, Xin, 2023. "Extreme structural response prediction and fatigue damage evaluation for large-scale monopile offshore wind turbines subject to typhoon conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 450-464.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:466-:d:94799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.