IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i1p65-d87094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal Performance for Wet Cooling Tower with Different Layout Patterns of Fillings under Typical Crosswind Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Gao

    (School of Energy Source and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Chang Guo

    (School of Energy Source and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Chaoqun Ma

    (School of Energy Source and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Yuetao Shi

    (School of Energy Source and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Fengzhong Sun

    (School of Energy Source and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

Abstract

A thermal-state model experimental study was performed in lab to investigate the thermal performance of a wet cooling tower with different kinds of filling layout patterns under windless and 0.4 m/s crosswind conditions. In this paper, the contrast analysis was focused on comparing a uniform layout pattern and one kind of optimal non-uniform layout pattern when the environmental crosswind speed is 0 m/s and 0.4 m/s. The experimental results proved that under windless conditions, the heat transfer coefficient and total heat rejection of circulating water for the optimal non-uniform layout pattern can enhance by approximately 40% and 28%, respectively, compared with the uniform layout pattern. It was also discovered that the optimal non-uniform pattern can dramatically relieve the influence of crosswind on the thermal performance of the tower when the crosswind speed is equal to 0.4 m/s. For the uniform layout pattern, the heat transfer coefficient under 0.4 m/s crosswind conditions decreased by 9.5% compared with the windless conditions, while that value lowered only by 2.0% for the optimal non-uniform layout pattern. It has been demonstrated that the optimal non-uniform layout pattern has the better thermal performance under 0.4 m/s crosswind condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Gao & Chang Guo & Chaoqun Ma & Yuetao Shi & Fengzhong Sun, 2017. "Thermal Performance for Wet Cooling Tower with Different Layout Patterns of Fillings under Typical Crosswind Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:65-:d:87094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/1/65/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/1/65/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bedekar, S.V & Nithiarasu, P & Seetharamu, K.N, 1998. "Experimental investigation of the performance of a counter-flow, packed-bed mechanical cooling tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 943-947.
    2. Ruixian Fang & Dan Gabriel Cacuci & Madalina Badea, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower Model: II. Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-47, September.
    3. Hannes Fugmann & Björn Nienborg & Gregor Trommler & Antoine Dalibard & Lena Schnabel, 2015. "Performance Evaluation of Air-Based Heat Rejection Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Masoud Rokni, 2016. "Performance Comparison on Repowering of a Steam Power Plant with Gas Turbines and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, May.
    5. He, Suoying & Gurgenci, Hal & Guan, Zhiqiang & Huang, Xiang & Lucas, Manuel, 2015. "A review of wetted media with potential application in the pre-cooling of natural draft dry cooling towers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 407-422.
    6. Dan Gabriel Cacuci & Ruixian Fang, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower: I. Adjoint Sensitivity Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-45, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weipeng Deng & Fengzhong Sun, 2021. "Comparative Study on the Cooling Characteristics of Different Fill Layout Patterns on a Single Air Inlet Induced Draft Cooling Tower," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmood, Muhammad H. & Sultan, Muhammad & Miyazaki, Takahiko & Koyama, Shigeru & Maisotsenko, Valeriy S., 2016. "Overview of the Maisotsenko cycle – A way towards dew point evaporative cooling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 537-555.
    2. Al-Bassam, E. & Maheshwari, G.P., 2011. "A new scheme for cooling tower water conservation in arid-zone countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 3985-3991.
    3. Iliya Krastev Iliev & Antonina Andreevna Filimonova & Andrey Alexandrovich Chichirov & Natalia Dmitrievna Chichirova & Alexander Vadimovich Pechenkin & Artem Sergeevich Vinogradov, 2023. "Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Combined Heat and Power Systems with SOFCs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Ma, Xiaoli & Zhao, Xudong & Zhang, Yufeng & Liu, Kaixin & Yang, Hui & Li, Jing & Akhlaghi, Yousef Golizadeh & Liu, Haowen & Han, Zhonghe & Liu, Zhijian, 2022. "Combined Rankine Cycle and dew point cooler for energy efficient power generation of the power plants - A review and perspective study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    5. Federico Di Rocco & Dan Gabriel Cacuci, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Buoyancy-Operated Cooling Tower under Unsaturated Conditions: Adjoint Sensitivity Model and Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-52, December.
    6. Moradi, Ramin & Cioccolanti, Luca & Del Zotto, Luca & Renzi, Massimiliano, 2023. "Comparative sensitivity analysis of micro-scale gas turbine and supercritical CO2 systems with bottoming organic Rankine cycles fed by the biomass gasification for decentralized trigeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Tejero-González, A. & Franco-Salas, A., 2021. "Optimal operation of evaporative cooling pads: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. He, Suoying & Gurgenci, Hal & Guan, Zhiqiang & Huang, Xiang & Lucas, Manuel, 2015. "A review of wetted media with potential application in the pre-cooling of natural draft dry cooling towers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 407-422.
    9. Sun, Yubiao & Duniam, Sam & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Dong, Peixin & Wang, Jianyong & Hooman, Kamel, 2019. "Coupling supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle with spray-assisted dry cooling technology for concentrated solar power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Lemouari, M. & Boumaza, M. & Kaabi, A., 2011. "Experimental investigation of the hydraulic characteristics of a counter flow wet cooling tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5815-5823.
    11. Panjeshahi, Mohammad Hassan & Gharaie, Mona & Ataei, Abtin, 2010. "Debottlenecking procedure of effluent thermal treatment system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5202-5208.
    12. Ruixian Fang & Dan Gabriel Cacuci & Madalina Badea, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower Model: II. Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-47, September.
    13. Wei, Huimin & Huang, Xianwei & Chen, Lin & Yang, Lijun & Du, Xiaoze, 2020. "Performance prediction and cost-effectiveness analysis of a novel natural draft hybrid cooling system for power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    14. Alvaro Fernandes & Joerg Brabandt & Oliver Posdziech & Ali Saadabadi & Mayra Recalde & Liyuan Fan & Eva O. Promes & Ming Liu & Theo Woudstra & Purushothaman Vellayan Aravind, 2018. "Design, Construction, and Testing of a Gasifier-Specific Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Dan Gabriel Cacuci & Ruixian Fang, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower: I. Adjoint Sensitivity Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-45, September.
    16. Björn Nienborg & Marc Mathieu & Alexander Schwärzler & Katharina Conzelmann & Lena Schnabel, 2021. "Model-Based Evaluation of Air-Side Fouling in Closed-Circuit Cooling Towers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena, 2019. "Upgrading existing gas-steam combined cycle power plants through steam injection and methane steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 229-243.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:65-:d:87094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.