IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i12p1028-d84661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Modeling of a Buoyancy-Operated Cooling Tower under Unsaturated Conditions: Adjoint Sensitivity Model and Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Di Rocco

    (Department of Astronautic, Electric and Energy Engineering (DIAEE), “Sapienza”—University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Dan Gabriel Cacuci

    (Center for Nuclear Science and Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, 300 Main Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

Abstract

Nuclear and other large-scale energy-producing plants must include systems that guarantee the safe discharge of residual heat from the industrial process into the atmosphere. This function is usually performed by one or several cooling towers. The amount of heat released by a cooling tower into the external environment can be quantified by using a numerical simulation model of the physical processes occurring in the respective tower, augmented by experimentally measured data that accounts for external conditions such as outlet air temperature, outlet water temperature, and outlet air relative humidity. The model’s responses of interest depend on many model parameters including correlations, boundary conditions, and material properties. Changes in these model parameters induce changes in the computed quantities of interest (called “model responses”), which are quantified by the sensitivities (i.e., functional derivatives) of the model responses with respect to the model parameters. These sensitivities are computed in this work by applying the general adjoint sensitivity analysis methodology (ASAM) for nonlinear systems. These sensitivities are subsequently used for: (i) Ranking the parameters in their importance to contributing to response uncertainties; (ii) Propagating the uncertainties (covariances) in these model parameters to quantify the uncertainties (covariances) in the model responses; (iii) Performing model validation and predictive modeling. The comprehensive predictive modeling methodology used in this work, which includes assimilation of experimental measurements and calibration of model parameters, is applied to the cooling tower model under unsaturated conditions. The predicted response uncertainties (standard deviations) thus obtained are smaller than both the computed and the measured standards deviations for the respective responses, even for responses where no experimental data were available.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Di Rocco & Dan Gabriel Cacuci, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Buoyancy-Operated Cooling Tower under Unsaturated Conditions: Adjoint Sensitivity Model and Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-52, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:12:p:1028-:d:84661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/12/1028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/12/1028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruixian Fang & Dan Gabriel Cacuci & Madalina Badea, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower Model: II. Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-47, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Gabriel Cacuci & Ruixian Fang, 2016. "Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower: I. Adjoint Sensitivity Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-45, September.
    2. Ming Gao & Chang Guo & Chaoqun Ma & Yuetao Shi & Fengzhong Sun, 2017. "Thermal Performance for Wet Cooling Tower with Different Layout Patterns of Fillings under Typical Crosswind Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:12:p:1028-:d:84661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.