IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i12p2029-d121125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Metaheuristic Approach to the Multi-Objective Unit Commitment Problem Combining Economic and Environmental Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Luís A. C. Roque

    (Departamento de Matemática, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
    LIAAD-INESC-TEC, Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciência, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Dalila B. M. M. Fontes

    (LIAAD-INESC-TEC, Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciência, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, 4200-464 Porto, Portugal)

  • Fernando A. C. C. Fontes

    (SYSTEC-ISR-Porto, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

We consider a Unit Commitment Problem (UCP) addressing not only the economic objective of minimizing the total production costs—as is done in the standard UCP—but also addressing environmental concerns. Our approach utilizes a multi-objective formulation and includes in the objective function a criterion to minimize the emission of pollutants. Environmental concerns are having a significant impact on the operation of power systems related to the emissions from fossil-fuelled power plants. However, the standard UCP, which minimizes just the total production costs, is inadequate to address environmental concerns. We propose to address the UCP with environmental concerns as a multi-objective problem and use a metaheuristic approach combined with a non-dominated sorting procedure to solve it. The metaheuristic developed is a variant of an evolutionary algorithm, known as Biased Random Key Genetic Algorithm. Computational experiments have been carried out on benchmark problems with up to 100 generation units for a 24 h scheduling horizon. The performance of the method, as well as the quality, diversity and the distribution characteristics of the solutions obtained are analysed. It is shown that the method proposed compares favourably against alternative approaches in most cases analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Luís A. C. Roque & Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2017. "A Metaheuristic Approach to the Multi-Objective Unit Commitment Problem Combining Economic and Environmental Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:2029-:d:121125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, J. & Botterud, A. & Bessa, R. & Keko, H. & Carvalho, L. & Issicaba, D. & Sumaili, J. & Miranda, V., 2011. "Wind power forecasting uncertainty and unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4014-4023.
    2. Carlos Henggeler Antunes & Carla Oliveira Henriques, 2016. "Multi-Objective Optimization and Multi-Criteria Analysis Models and Methods for Problems in the Energy Sector," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 1067-1165, Springer.
    3. Wang, Wenxiao & Li, Chaoshun & Liao, Xiang & Qin, Hui, 2017. "Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 612-626.
    4. Abujarad, Saleh Y. & Mustafa, M.W. & Jamian, J.J., 2017. "Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 215-223.
    5. Zio, E. & Baraldi, P. & Pedroni, N., 2009. "Optimal power system generation scheduling by multi-objective genetic algorithms with preferences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 432-444.
    6. L. A. C. Roque & D. B. M. M. Fontes & F. A. C. C. Fontes, 2014. "A hybrid biased random key genetic algorithm approach for the unit commitment problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 140-166, July.
    7. PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony & OREN, Shmuel & ROUNTREE, Barry, 2015. "Applying high performance computing to transmissions-consstrained stochastic unit commitment for renewable energy integration," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2679, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    8. Thiago Noronha & Mauricio Resende & Celso Ribeiro, 2011. "A biased random-key genetic algorithm for routing and wavelength assignment," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 503-518, July.
    9. Quan, Hao & Srinivasan, Dipti & Khambadkone, Ashwin M. & Khosravi, Abbas, 2015. "A computational framework for uncertainty integration in stochastic unit commitment with intermittent renewable energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 71-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyu-Hyung Jo & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2018. "Improved Genetic Algorithm-Based Unit Commitment Considering Uncertainty Integration Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    2. Mohammad Masih Sediqi & Mohammed Elsayed Lotfy & Abdul Matin Ibrahimi & Tomonobu Senjyu & Narayanan. K, 2019. "Stochastic Unit Commitment and Optimal Power Trading Incorporating PV Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Wang, Wenxiao & Li, Chaoshun & Liao, Xiang & Qin, Hui, 2017. "Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 612-626.
    4. Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Lubiano-Walochik, Helena & Shah, Nilay, 2017. "Integrated renewable electricity generation considering uncertainties: The UK roadmap to 50% power generation from wind and solar energies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 385-398.
    5. Jiang, Sufan & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Zhao, Xin & Liu, Yu & Guo, Yasen & Wang, Sicheng, 2020. "A novel robust security constrained unit commitment model considering HVDC regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Xie, Kaigui & Dong, Jizhe & Singh, Chanan & Hu, Bo, 2016. "Optimal capacity and type planning of generating units in a bundled wind–thermal generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 200-210.
    7. Bai, Linquan & Li, Fangxing & Cui, Hantao & Jiang, Tao & Sun, Hongbin & Zhu, Jinxiang, 2016. "Interval optimization based operating strategy for gas-electricity integrated energy systems considering demand response and wind uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 270-279.
    8. Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Golestaneh, Faranak & Gooi, Hoay Beng & Lin, Jeremy & Bavafa, Farhad & Terzija, Vladimir, 2016. "Corrective economic dispatch and operational cycles for probabilistic unit commitment with demand response and high wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 634-651.
    9. Shin, Joohyun & Lee, Jay H. & Realff, Matthew J., 2017. "Operational planning and optimal sizing of microgrid considering multi-scale wind uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 616-633.
    10. Talari, Saber & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Osório, Gerardo J. & Aghaei, Jamshid & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "Stochastic modelling of renewable energy sources from operators' point-of-view: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1953-1965.
    11. Julliany S. Brandão & Thiago F. Noronha & Celso C. Ribeiro, 2016. "A biased random-key genetic algorithm to maximize the number of accepted lightpaths in WDM optical networks," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 813-835, August.
    12. Doubleday, Kate & Lara, José Daniel & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2022. "Investigation of stochastic unit commitment to enable advanced flexibility measures for high shares of solar PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    13. Zhiwei Li & Tianran Jin & Shuqiang Zhao & Jinshan Liu, 2018. "Power System Day-Ahead Unit Commitment Based on Chance-Constrained Dependent Chance Goal Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Moghaddas Tafreshi, Seyed Masoud & Ranjbarzadeh, Hassan & Jafari, Mehdi & Khayyam, Hamid, 2016. "A probabilistic unit commitment model for optimal operation of plug-in electric vehicles in microgrid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 934-947.
    15. Chen, J.J. & Qi, B.X. & Peng, K. & Li, Y. & Zhao, Y.L., 2020. "Conditional value-at-credibility for random fuzzy wind power in demand response integrated multi-period economic emission dispatch," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    16. Hemmati, Reza & Saboori, Hedayat & Saboori, Saeid, 2016. "Assessing wind uncertainty impact on short term operation scheduling of coordinated energy storage systems and thermal units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 74-84.
    17. Konneh, Keifa Vamba & Masrur, Hasan & Konneh, David A. & Senjyu, Tomonobu, 2022. "Independent or complementary power system configuration: A decision making approach for sustainable electrification of an urban environment in Sierra Leone," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    18. Li, Chaoshun & Wang, Wenxiao & Wang, Jinwen & Chen, Deshu, 2019. "Network-constrained unit commitment with RE uncertainty and PHES by using a binary artificial sheep algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Gerardo J. Osório & Miadreza Shafie-khah & Juan M. Lujano-Rojas & João P. S. Catalão, 2018. "Scheduling Model for Renewable Energy Sources Integration in an Insular Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Zhihan Shi & Weisong Han & Guangming Zhang & Zhiqing Bai & Mingxiang Zhu & Xiaodong Lv, 2022. "Research on Low-Carbon Energy Sharing through the Alliance of Integrated Energy Systems with Multiple Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:2029-:d:121125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.