IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i3p51-d1342451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Funding for Sustainable Transport Systems—Influencing Factor of Regional Economic Development in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Maria Bocaneala

    (Economics 1 Doctoral School, Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE), 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Daniel Sorin Manole

    (Department of Economic Sciences, Constantin Brâncoveanu University, Calea Bascovului 2a, 110095 Pitești, Romania)

  • Elvira Alexandra Gherasim

    (Economics 1 Doctoral School, Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE), 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Bianca Motorga

    (Economics 1 Doctoral School, Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE), 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Livia Cristina Iliescu

    (Economics 1 Doctoral School, Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE), 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Sustainable development is a core concept in regional development. Sustainability is characterized by supporting the building of resilient infrastructure and promoting the sustainable industry. In this context, sustainable transport is particularly important as it represents an opportunity for regional development. This research aims to quantify the impact of investments through structural instruments, specifically EU funds, on promoting a sustainable transport system and eliminating barriers from large-scale transport networks. This study focuses on the impact of these investments on regional economic development in Romania. The analysis used data from all eight development regions of the Romanian economy between 2014 and 2020. Panel data regression models, including the generalized difference method of moments (Dif-GMM) and the system GMM method (Sys GMM), were employed. This study confirms the idea that European structural and investment funds (ESIFs) play a positive role in promoting sustainable transport for regional economic development. Additionally, the quality of regional governance is identified as a key factor in economic development. This study, therefore, reveals a convergence effect between regions. Regions with a lower initial GDP per capita develop quicker compared to regions with a higher initial GDP per capita, indicating a “catch-up” effect. From a policy perspective, these issues can guide decision making and resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Maria Bocaneala & Daniel Sorin Manole & Elvira Alexandra Gherasim & Bianca Motorga & Livia Cristina Iliescu, 2024. "European Funding for Sustainable Transport Systems—Influencing Factor of Regional Economic Development in Romania," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:51-:d:1342451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/3/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/3/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergey Bobylev & Olga Kudryavtseva & Ekaterina Yakovleva, 2015. "Regional Priorities of Green Economy," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 148-160.
      • Bobylev Sergey Nikolayevich & Kudryavtseva Olga Vladimirovna & Yakovleva Yekaterina Yuryevna, 2015. "Regional priorities of green economy," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 2, pages 148-159.
    2. Zsolt Darvas & Jan Mazza & Catarina Midões, 2021. "European Union cohesion project characteristics and regional economic growth," Bruegel Working Papers 40970, Bruegel.
    3. Nicholas Charron & Lewis Dijkstra & Victor Lapuente, 2015. "Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 315-346, June.
    4. Nicholas Charron & Lewis Dijkstra & Victor Lapuente, 2015. "Erratum to: Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 1059-1059, December.
    5. Darvas, Zsolt & Mazza, Jan & Midões, Catarina, 2021. "Cohesion project characteristics and regional economic growth in the European Union," Corvinus Economics Working Papers (CEWP) 2021/03, Corvinus University of Budapest.
    6. Bobylev, S. N. & Kudryavtseva, O. V. & Yakovleva, Ye. Yu., 2015. "Green Economy: Regional Priorities," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(2), pages 268-279.
    7. Nicholas Charron & Lewis Dijkstra & Victor Lapuente, 2014. "Regional Governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 68-90, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Muringani & Rune Dahl Fitjar & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2024. "Political trust and economic development in European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(4), pages 2059-2089, December.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Roberto Ganau, 2022. "Institutions and the productivity challenge for European regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25.
    3. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia & Livio Ferrante & Domenico Lisi, 2024. "The Quality of Regional Institutional Context and Museum Service Provision: Evidence from Italy," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 10(1), pages 155-195, March.
    4. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Roberto Ganau & Kristina Maslauskaite & Monica Brezzi, 2021. "Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 299-328, March.
    5. Bachtrögler, Julia & Oberhofer, Harald, 2018. "Euroscepticism and EU Cohesion Policy: The Impact of Micro-Level Policy Effectiveness on Voting Behavior," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 273, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    6. Jesús Peiró-Palomino & Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo, 2018. "Assessing well-being in European regions. Does government quality matter?," Working Papers 2018/06, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    7. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Vinko Muštra, 2022. "The economic returns of decentralisation: Government quality and the role of space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(8), pages 1604-1622, November.
    8. De Luca, Giacomo & Lisi, Domenico & Martorana, Marco & Siciliani, Luigi, 2021. "Does higher Institutional Quality improve the Appropriateness of Healthcare Provision?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    9. Enrico Bertacchini & Federico Revelli, 2021. "Kalòs kai agathòs? government quality and cultural heritage in the regions of Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(2), pages 513-539, October.
    10. Vasilis Angelis & Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis & Katerina Dimaki, 2016. "Identifying Clusters of Regions in the European South, based on their Economic, Social and Environmental Characteristics," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 3, pages 71-102.
    11. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2020. "Institutions and the fortunes of territories," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 371-386, June.
    12. Javier Barbero & Martin Christensen & Andrea Conte & Patrizio Lecca & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Simone Salotti, 2023. "Improving Government Quality in the Regions of the EU and its System‐Wide Benefits for Cohesion Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 38-57, January.
    13. Marenzi, Anna & Rizzi, Dino & Zanette, Michele & Zantomio, Francesca, 2023. "Regional institutional quality and territorial equity in LTC provision," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    14. Roberto Ezcurra, 2024. "Kin networks and quality of government: a regional analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(4), pages 2117-2142, December.
    15. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Credit constraints in European SMEs: does regional institutional quality matter?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(15), pages 1388-1392, September.
    16. Bianchini, Stefano & Llerena, Patrick & Martino, Roberto, 2019. "The impact of R&D subsidies under different institutional frameworks," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 65-78.
    17. Bachtrögler, Julia, 2016. "On the effectiveness of EU structural funds during the Great Recession: Estimates from a heterogeneous local average treatment effects framework," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 230, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    18. Laura Frassine & Nicola Pontarollo & Carolina Serpieri, 2024. "Strengths and weaknesses of EU regional reactivity to shocks," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1593-1624, December.
    19. Elisabetta Reginato & Isabella Fadda & Paola Paglietti & Aldo Pavan, 2021. "Informal Payments and Performance in the Health Care Sector: Possible Relationships in a Sub-National Perspective," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 126-126, July.
    20. Akbari, Mahsa & Bahrami-Rad, Duman & Kimbrough, Erik O., 2019. "Kinship, fractionalization and corruption," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 493-528.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:51-:d:1342451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.