IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i2p44-d1336245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential Analytical Impact of Significant Sectoral Creative Economy on Thailand’s Economy: A Case Study of the IRS-CGE Model vs. the CRS-CGE Model for Both the National and Provincial Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Chukiat Chaiboonsri

    (Modern Quantitative Economic Research Centre (MQERC), Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

The United Nations has promoted and supported the UNCTAD Creative Economy Programme since 2004 to help countries around the world understand how to promote economic development through creativity in industries. This research article aims to determine whether the creative economy will be the major engine to accelerate Thailand’s economic development in the coming decade or not, and what the major creative economy sectors are that must be prioritized or initiated and focused on. The data implemented in this research cover 2011–2018, which consist of creative economy sector income, the IO table, and the SAM table. The methodology utilized in this research was the ML model, the GREY model for predicting the growth rate of income from the major creative economy sectors contribute to Thailand’s economy between 2019–2025, and the CGE model. The study’s empirical findings show that the significant sectoral creative economy consists of fashion, advertising, Thai food, and cultural tourism, which need to be given more stimulus. Furthermore, the economies of Chiang Mai, and Thailand as a whole, would eventually be high-income economies if creative economy sectors were to be promoted and continuously supported by efficient policies. the economic growth of Thailand and Chiang Mai would eventually become high income whenever these economies allow creative economy sectors to be promoted or supported by efficient policies continuously.

Suggested Citation

  • Chukiat Chaiboonsri, 2024. "The Potential Analytical Impact of Significant Sectoral Creative Economy on Thailand’s Economy: A Case Study of the IRS-CGE Model vs. the CRS-CGE Model for Both the National and Provincial Economies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:44-:d:1336245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/2/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/2/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bajzik, Josef & Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Schwarz, Jiri, 2020. "Estimating the Armington elasticity: The importance of study design and publication bias," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Burfisher,Mary E., 2021. "Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108748025.
    3. Nobuhiro Hosoe & Kenji Gasawa & Hideo Hashimoto, 2010. "Textbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modelling," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-28165-3.
    4. Burfisher,Mary E., 2021. "Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108490085.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Li-Jing & Yao, Yun-Fei & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Qian, Xiang-Yan & Xu, Chun-Lei & Wei, Si-Yi & Creutzig, Felix & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Combining economic recovery with climate change mitigation: A global evaluation of financial instruments," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 438-453.
    2. Afonso, Damares Lopes & Bastos, Suzana Quinet de Andrade & Perobelli, Fernando Salgueiro, 2021. "Latin America and China: mutual benefit or dependency?," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    3. Roberto Roson, 2022. "Underemployment in a Computable General Equilibrium Model," Working Papers 2022:17, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    4. Lauren F. Bergquist & Benjamin Faber & Thibault Fally & Matthias Hoelzlein & Edward Miguel & Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, 2022. "Scaling Agricultural Policy Interventions," NBER Working Papers 30704, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Acosta, Alejandro & McCorriston, Steve & Nicolli, Francesco & Venturelli, Ester & Wickramasinghe, Upali & ArceDiaz, Eduardo & Scudiero, Lavinia & Sammartino, Alejandro & Schneider, Fritz & Steinfeld, , 2021. "Immediate effects of COVID-19 on the global dairy sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Nejati, Mehdi & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim, 2023. "How does ICT trade shape environmental impacts across the north-south regions? Intra-regional and Inter-regional perspective from dynamic CGE model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    7. Kamel Almutairi & Ramzi Alahmadi, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of the Recent Unprecedented World Events on the Economic and Environmental Conditions of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Akiko Higashi & Ken Itakura & Yushi Inoue & Hiroaki Otake, 2022. "Analysis of the change in the structure of the Japanese power supply using the GTAP-E-power model," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Aubry, Amandine & Héricourt, Jérôme & Marchal, Léa & Nedoncelle, Clément, 2022. "Does Immigration AffectWages? A Meta-Analysis," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2202, CEPREMAP.
    10. M. Alejandro Cardenete & M. Carmen Lima & Ferran Sancho, 2013. "Are There Key Sectors? An Appraisal Using Applied General Equilibrium," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 43(2,3), pages 111-129, Winter.
    11. Korrakot Phomsoda & Nattapong Puttanapong & Mongkut Piantanakulchai, 2021. "Economic Impacts of Thailand’s Biofuel Subsidy Reallocation Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Funke, Michael & Wende, Adrian, 2022. "Modeling semiconductor export restrictions and the US-China trade conflict," BOFIT Discussion Papers 13/2022, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    13. Demena, B.A., 2021. "Effectiveness of export promotion programmes," ISS Working Papers - General Series 688, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    14. Nuno Palma & André C. Silva, 2024. "Spending A Windfall," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 65(1), pages 283-313, February.
    15. Ramón E. Key-Hernández & Claudina Villarroel, 2014. "Domestic impact of production cuts in OPEC countries: The cases of Nigeria and Venezuela," EcoMod2014 7007, EcoMod.
    16. Ramón E. Key-Hernández & Claudina Villarroel, 2017. "Subsidies to the Energy Sector in Venezuela: the effects of their removal considering inter-fuel substitution," EcoMod2017 10422, EcoMod.
    17. Bertinelli, Luisito & Cardi, Olivier & Restout, Romain, 2022. "Labor market effects of technology shocks biased toward the traded sector," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Maru, Takeshi, 2016. "How Social Customs Restrict EU Accession Effects on Female Labor Participation in Agricultural Production in Rural Adana, Turkey: A Simulation Analysis," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 18.
    19. Jacopo Timini & Nicola Cortinovis & Fernando López Vicente, 2022. "The heterogeneous effects of trade agreements with labour provisions," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 2820-2853, September.
    20. Timini, Jacopo & Viani, Francesca, 2022. "A highway across the Atlantic? Trade and welfare effects of the EU-Mercosur agreement," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 291-308.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:44-:d:1336245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.