IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v11y2023i12p286-d1284932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mediating Effect of Perceived Trust in the Adoption of Cutting-Edge Financial Technology among Digital Natives in the Post-COVID-19 Era

Author

Listed:
  • Udit Chawla

    (Business Administration Department, University of Engineering and Management, Kolkata 700160, India)

  • Rajesh Mohnot

    (College of Business Admininstration, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates)

  • Harsh Vikram Singh

    (Computer Application Department, Techno India University, Kolkata 700091, India)

  • Arindam Banerjee

    (S.P. Jain School of Global Management, Dubai Campus, Dubai P.O. Box 502345, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

The primary aim of this research is to thoroughly examine the determinants that influence customers’ intention towards embracing FinTech products and services, thereby enriching our understanding of the adoption and utilization trends within the FinTech industry in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is quantitative research in the context of India covering five major tech-savvy cities—Mumbai, Bengaluru, New Delhi, Pune, and Chennai. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), the mediation effect of Perceived Trust was examined in order to see the relationship between the retrieved constructs and their attributes. Predominantly, the data delve into the utilization of financial technology and the prevailing embrace of this transformative innovation by contemporary Indian society. From the findings, it has emerged that the three factors influencing Customer Intention to Adopt FinTech products are “Perceived Security”, “Perceived Risks”, and “Perceived Trust”. The significance of Perceived Security in the realm of defending against cyber risks and safeguarding personal information has been discovered to have a profound effect on individuals’ inclination to embrace FinTech. Likewise, acknowledging the potential risks and uncertainties that come with FinTech has proven to have a favorable impact on the intention to adopt. Notably, the perception of trust, which encompasses aspects such as the credibility of the company and the user-friendly nature of the technology, has been identified as a significant driver towards adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Udit Chawla & Rajesh Mohnot & Harsh Vikram Singh & Arindam Banerjee, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of Perceived Trust in the Adoption of Cutting-Edge Financial Technology among Digital Natives in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:286-:d:1284932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/12/286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/12/286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buchak, Greg & Matvos, Gregor & Piskorski, Tomasz & Seru, Amit, 2018. "Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 453-483.
    2. Mark A Chen & Qinxi Wu & Baozhong Yang, 2019. "How Valuable Is FinTech Innovation?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 2062-2106.
    3. Senyo, PK & Osabutey, Ellis L.C., 2020. "Unearthing antecedents to financial inclusion through FinTech innovations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Rabindra Jena, 2023. "Factors Impacting Senior Citizens’ Adoption of E-Banking Post COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study from India," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2018. "Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 35-46.
    6. Jiaxin Zhang & Yan Luximon, 2021. "A quantitative diary study of perceptions of security in mobile payment transactions," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(15), pages 1579-1602, November.
    7. Yoonyoung Hwang & Sangwook Park & Nina Shin, 2021. "Sustainable Development of a Mobile Payment Security Environment Using Fintech Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Wang, Xiaoting & Hou, Siyuan & Kyaw, Khine & Xue, Xupeng & Liu, Xueqin, 2023. "Exploring the determinants of Fintech Credit: A comprehensive analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Lei Xu & Qian Liu & Bin Li & Chen Ma, 2022. "Fintech business and firm access to bank loans," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4381-4421, December.
    4. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mojdeh Gerami Amin, 2023. "The transformative potential of banking service domains with the emergence of FinTechs," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 411-447, September.
    5. Santiago Carbó-Valverde & Pedro J. Cuadros-Solas & Francisco Rodríguez-Fernández, 2022. "Entrepreneurial, institutional and financial strategies for FinTech profitability," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-36, December.
    6. Bo Li & Zeshui Xu, 2021. "Insights into financial technology (FinTech): a bibliometric and visual study," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Jiamin Liu & Xiaoyu Ma & Bin Zhao & Qi Cui & Sisi Zhang & Jiaoning Zhang, 2023. "Mandatory Environmental Regulation, Enterprise Labor Demand and Green Innovation Transformation: A Quasi-Experiment from China’s New Environmental Protection Law," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    8. Hiranya Dissanayake & Catalin Popescu & Anuradha Iddagoda, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Financial Technology: Unveiling the Research Landscape," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Luiz Antonio Joia & Rodrigo Proença, 2022. "The social representation of fintech from the perspective of traditional financial sector professionals: evidence from Brazil," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Guo, Junyan & Fang, Hanqing & Liu, Xuexin & Wang, Cizhi & Wang, Yuan, 2023. "FinTech and financing constraints of enterprises: Evidence from China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Liu, Jiangtao & Zhang, Yi & Kuang, Jia, 2023. "Fintech development and green innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    12. Hasan, Iftekhar & Li, Xiang & Takalo, Tuomas, 2023. "Technological innovation and the bank lending channel of monetary policy transmission," BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/2023, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    13. Merello, Paloma & Barberá, Antonio & la Poza, Elena De, 2022. "Is the sustainability profile of FinTech companies a key driver of their value?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Xia, Yanchun & Qiao, Zhilin & Xie, Guanghua, 2022. "Corporate resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of digital finance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Florian Diener & Miroslav Špaček, 2021. "Digital Transformation in Banking: A Managerial Perspective on Barriers to Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Pacelli, Vincenzo & Miglietta, Federica & Foglia, Matteo, 2022. "The extreme risk connectedness of the new financial system: European evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Deli Wang & Ke Peng & Kaiye Tang & Yewei Wu, 2022. "Does Fintech Development Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Kakhkharov, Jakhongir & Bianchi, Robert J., 2022. "COVID-19 and policy responses: Early evidence in banks and FinTech stocks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Ji, Yu & Shi, Lina & Zhang, Shunming, 2022. "Digital finance and corporate bankruptcy risk: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Ahmet F. Aysan & Zhamal Nanaeva, 2022. "Fintech as a Financial Disruptor: A Bibliometric Analysis," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:286-:d:1284932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.