IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v13y2025i4p39-d1776868.html

Demonstrating That the Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bounds Test Can Detect a Long-Run Levels Relationship When the Dependent Variable Is I (0)

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Stewart

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT1 2EE, UK)

Abstract

The autoregressive distributed lag bounds t -test and F-test for a long-run relationship that allows level variables to be either I ( 1 ) or I ( 0 ) is widely used in the literature. However, a long-run levels relationship cannot be detected when the dependent variable is I 0 , because both tests will always reject their null hypotheses. It has subsequently been argued that a third test determines whether the dependent variable is I ( 1 ) , such that when all three tests reject their null hypotheses, a cointegrating equation with an I ( 1 ) dependent variable is identified. It is argued that all three tests rejecting their null hypotheses rules out the possibility that the dependent variable is I ( 0 ) , implying that the three tests cannot detect an equilibrium when the dependent variable is I ( 0 ) . Our first contribution is to demonstrate and explain that rejection of all three tests’ null hypotheses can also indicate an equilibrium when the dependent variable is I ( 0 ) and not only when it is I ( 1 ) . Our second contribution is to produce previously unavailable critical values for the third test in the cases where an intercept or trend is restricted into the equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Stewart, 2025. "Demonstrating That the Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bounds Test Can Detect a Long-Run Levels Relationship When the Dependent Variable Is I (0)," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:39-:d:1776868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/13/4/39/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/13/4/39/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Rogoff, 1996. "The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 647-668, June.
    2. Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee & Tsangyao Chang & Tsung-Hsien Chen & Han-Wen Tzeng, 2017. "Revisiting purchasing power parity in Eastern European countries: quantile unit root tests," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 463-483, March.
    3. Huang, Chao-Hsi & Yang, Chih-Yuan, 2015. "European exchange rate regimes and purchasing power parity: An empirical study on eleven eurozone countries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 100-109.
    4. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    5. Cho, Jin Seo & Kim, Tae-hwan & Shin, Yongcheol, 2015. "Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 281-300.
    6. Sam, Chung Yan & McNown, Robert & Goh, Soo Khoon, 2019. "An augmented autoregressive distributed lag bounds test for cointegration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 130-141.
    7. Sebastian Kripfganz & Daniel C. Schneider, 2020. "Response Surface Regressions for Critical Value Bounds and Approximate p‐values in Equilibrium Correction Models," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(6), pages 1456-1481, December.
    8. Peter Pedroni, 2001. "Purchasing Power Parity Tests In Cointegrated Panels," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(4), pages 727-731, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Stewart, 2023. "The autoregressive distributed lag bounds test generalised to consider a long-run levels relationship when all levels variables are ?(?)," Economics Discussion Papers 2023-2, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    2. Roy, Arup, 2024. "Impacts of economic development, globalization, and gross capital formation on natural resources rents: Evidence from India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Narasingha Das & Partha Gangopadhyay, 2023. "Did weekly economic index and volatility index impact US food sales during the first year of the pandemic?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Hai Long Vo & Duc Hong Vo, 2023. "The purchasing power parity and exchange‐rate economics half a century on," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 446-479, April.
    5. Bertelli, Stefano & Vacca, Gianmarco & Zoia, Maria, 2022. "Bootstrap cointegration tests in ARDL models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Ousama Ben-Salha & Abdelaziz Hakimi & Taha Zaghdoudi & Hassan Soltani & Mariem Nsaibi, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Fossil Fuel Prices on Renewable Energy in China Using the Novel Dynamic ARDL Simulations Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Alper Karasoy, 2021. "How do remittances to the Philippines affect its environmental sustainability? Evidence based on the augmented ARDL approach," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(2), pages 120-137, May.
    8. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Isik, Cem, 2021. "Determinants of the load capacity factor in China: A novel dynamic ARDL approach for ecological footprint accounting," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Ma, Wei & Li, Haiqi & Park, Sung Y., 2017. "Empirical conditional quantile test for purchasing power parity: Evidence from East Asian countries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 211-222.
    10. Karasoy, Alper, 2022. "Is innovative technology a solution to Japan's long-run energy insecurity? Dynamic evidence from the linear and nonlinear methods," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Georgios Bertsatos & Plutarchos Sakellaris & Mike G. Tsionas, 2022. "Correction to: Extensions of the Pesaran, Shin and Smith (2001) bounds testing procedure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 635-635, February.
    12. Zheng, Li & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Salem, Sultan & Irfan, Muhammad & Alvarado, Rafael & Lv, Kangjuan, 2022. "How technological innovation and institutional quality affect sectoral energy consumption in Pakistan? Fresh policy insights from novel econometric approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Ersin Yavuz & Emre Kilic & Abdullah Emre Caglar, 2024. "A new hypothesis for the unemployment-environment dilemma: is the environmental Phillips curve valid in the framework of load capacity factor in Turkiye?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29475-29492, November.
    14. Hong, Seung Hyun & Phillips, Peter C. B., 2010. "Testing Linearity in Cointegrating Relations With an Application to Purchasing Power Parity," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 28(1), pages 96-114.
    15. Nuno Carlos Leitão, 2021. "Testing the Role of Trade on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Portugal," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Hasanov, Fakhri J. & Javid, Muhammad & Mikayilov, Jeyhun I. & Shabaneh, Rami & Darandary, Abdulelah & Alyamani, Ryan, 2025. "Macroeconomic and sectoral effects of natural gas price: Policy insights from a macroeconometric model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Akın Fatih, 2026. "The Relationship Between External Debt and Environmental Quality in Türkiye: A Fractional Frequency Fourier ARDL Bounds Test Approach," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 87-101.
    18. Ahmed, Maruf Yakubu & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu, 2021. "Counterfactual shock in energy commodities affects stock market dynamics: Evidence from the United States," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Zhang, Zhibai, 2015. "Convergence of absolute purchasing power parity," MPRA Paper 64486, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Fatma Erdem & Erdal Özmen, 2015. "Exchange Rate Regimes and Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1041-1058, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:39-:d:1776868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.