IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i21p2193-d1777458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach to Remote Sensing-Based Estimation of Hourly Agricultural Evapotranspiration in Drylands

Author

Listed:
  • Qifeng Zhuang

    (College of Geomatics Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Weiwei Zhu

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Nana Yan

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Ghaleb Faour

    (National Center for Remote Sensing, National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut 1107 2260, Lebanon)

  • Mariam Ibrahim

    (National Center for Remote Sensing, National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut 1107 2260, Lebanon)

  • Liang Zhu

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Obtaining evapotranspiration (ET) estimates at high spatiotemporal resolution is a fundamental prerequisite for clarifying the patterns and controlling factors of agricultural water consumption in drylands. However, most existing ET products are provided at daily or coarser spatial–temporal scales, which limits the ability to capture short-term variations in crop water use. This study developed a novel hourly 10-m ET estimation method that combines remote sensing with machine learning techniques. The approach was evaluated using agricultural sites in two arid regions: the Heihe River Basin in China and the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon. By integrating hourly eddy covariance measurements, Sentinel-2 reflectance data, and ERA5-Land reanalysis meteorological variables, we constructed an XGBoost-based modeling framework for hourly ET estimation, and incorporated the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method for model interpretability analysis. Results demonstrated that the model achieved strong performance across all sites (R 2 = 0.86–0.91, RMSE = 0.04–0.05 mm·h −1 ). Additional metrics, including the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) and percent bias (PBIAS), further confirmed the model’s robustness. Interpreting the model with SHAP highlighted net radiation (Rn), 2-m temperature (t2m), and near-infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv) as the dominant factors controlling hourly ET variations. Significant interaction effects, such as Rn × NIRv and Rn × t2m, were also identified, revealing the modulation mechanism of energy, vegetation status and temperature coupling on hourly ET. The study offers a practical workflow and an interpretable framework for generating high-resolution ET maps, thereby supporting regional water accounting and land–atmosphere interaction research.

Suggested Citation

  • Qifeng Zhuang & Weiwei Zhu & Nana Yan & Ghaleb Faour & Mariam Ibrahim & Liang Zhu, 2025. "An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach to Remote Sensing-Based Estimation of Hourly Agricultural Evapotranspiration in Drylands," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:21:p:2193-:d:1777458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/21/2193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/21/2193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stan Lipovetsky & Michael Conklin, 2001. "Analysis of regression in game theory approach," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 319-330, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar & Rabitti, Giovanni, 2024. "The many Shapley values for explainable artificial intelligence: A sensitivity analysis perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 911-926.
    2. Pera, Rebecca & Viglia, Giampaolo & Furlan, Roberto, 2016. "Who Am I? How Compelling Self-storytelling Builds Digital Personal Reputation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 44-55.
    3. Stan Lipovetsky, 2021. "Predictor Analysis in Group Decision Making," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Hugh Chen & Scott M. Lundberg & Su-In Lee, 2022. "Explaining a series of models by propagating Shapley values," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Emrah Arbak, 2017. "Identifying the provisioning policies of Belgian banks," Working Paper Research 326, National Bank of Belgium.
    6. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2017. "When distinction does not pay off - Investigating the determinants of European agritourism prices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 45-52.
    7. Xingwei Hu, 2020. "A theory of dichotomous valuation with applications to variable selection," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 1075-1099, November.
    8. Dmitry Sharapov & Paul Kattuman & Diego Rodriguez & F. Javier Velazquez, 2021. "Using the SHAPLEY value approach to variance decomposition in strategy research: Diversification, internationalization, and corporate group effects on affiliate profitability," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 608-623, March.
    9. Xingwei Hu, 2018. "A Theory of Dichotomous Valuation with Applications to Variable Selection," Papers 1808.00131, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    10. Kyle Lesinger & Di Tian, 2025. "Skillful subseasonal soil moisture drought forecasts with deep learning-dynamic models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Filotto, Umberto & Caratelli, Massimo & Fornezza, Fabrizio, 2021. "Shaping the digital transformation of the retail banking industry. Empirical evidence from Italy," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 366-375.
    12. Elena Pokryshevskaya & Evgeny Antipov, 2013. "Importance-performance analysis for internet stores: a system based on publicly available panel data," HSE Working papers WP BRP 08/MAN/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Pelin Ayranci & Phung Lai & Nhathai Phan & Han Hu & Alexander Kolinowski & David Newman & Deijing Dou, 2022. "OnML: an ontology-based approach for interpretable machine learning," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 770-793, August.
    14. Haapaniemi, Jouni & Haakana, Juha & Räisänen, Otto & Tikka, Ville & Lassila, Jukka & Rautiainen, Antti, 2025. "Quantification of implicit price flexibility of household customers’ load demand with machine learning and Shapley analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    15. Jin Hayakawa & Tomohisa Seki & Yoshimasa Kawazoe & Kazuhiko Ohe, 2022. "Pathway importance by graph convolutional network and Shapley additive explanations in gene expression phenotype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Jeffrey H. Bergstrand & Jordi Paniagua, 2024. "Do Deep Trade Agreements’ Provisions Actually Increase – or Decrease – Trade and/or FDI?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11526, CESifo.
    17. Eranga M. Wimalasiri & Ebrahim Jahanshiri & Tengku Adhwa Syaherah Tengku Mohd Suhairi & Hasika Udayangani & Ranjith B. Mapa & Asha S. Karunaratne & Lal P. Vidhanarachchi & Sayed N. Azam-Ali, 2020. "Basic Soil Data Requirements for Process-Based Crop Models as a Basis for Crop Diversification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Khoa Tran & Hai-Canh Vu & Lam Pham & Nassim Boudaoud & Ho-Si-Hung Nguyen, 2024. "Robust-MBDL: A Robust Multi-Branch Deep-Learning-Based Model for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Rotating Machines," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Gi-Wook Cha & Choon-Wook Park & Young-Chan Kim & Hyeun Jun Moon, 2023. "Predicting Generation of Different Demolition Waste Types Using Simple Artificial Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Gabriel Ferrettini & Elodie Escriva & Julien Aligon & Jean-Baptiste Excoffier & Chantal Soulé-Dupuy, 2022. "Coalitional Strategies for Efficient Individual Prediction Explanation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-75, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:21:p:2193-:d:1777458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.