Author
Listed:
- Zijuan Ding
(Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China)
- Jin Zeng
(Tongxin Huahai Agricultural Tourism Development Co., Ltd., Zhijiang 443202, China)
- Zhilong He
(Sanya Institute of China Agricultural University, Sanya 572000, China)
- Bo Zhu
(Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China)
- Jiangwen Nie
(Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China)
- Yong Zhou
(Hubei Key Laboratory of Resource Utilization and Quality Control of Characteristic Crops, College of Life Science and Technology, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan 432000, China)
- Mengdie Jiang
(Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China)
- Zhangyong Liu
(Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China)
Abstract
Ratoon rice is a planting system that efficiently utilizes temperature and light resources. However, multiple fertilization applications are typically required to maintain stable rice yields. Improper fertilization not only poses challenges to scarce labor resources but also increases carbon footprints (CFs). Research on the effects of different fertilization strategies on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, yield, CF, and ecosystem net economic benefits (NEEBs) in ratoon rice systems remains limited. A two-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of one conventional fertilization strategy and four optimized fertilization strategies on GHG emissions, yield, CF, and NEEBs in the ratoon rice system. The conventional fertilization strategy applied urea in five splits (FFP, 280 kg N·ha −1 ). The optimized strategies included (1) one-time side deep application controlled-release fertilizer (CRF, 280 kg N·ha −1 ); (2) CRF with 20% N replaced by organic fertilizer (OF + CRF1); (3) the same as (2) with a 10% N reduction (OF + CRF2, 252 kg N·ha −1 ); and (4) the same as (2) with a 20% N reduction (OF + CRF3, 224 kg N·ha −1 ). The results showed that compared with FFP, optimized fertilization treatments reduced CH 4 and N 2 O emissions by 28.69% to 55.27% and 25.08% to 40.32%, respectively. They also increased the annual rice yields by 2.22% to 19.52% (except OF + CRF3). Optimizing fertilization treatments reduced annual CF, CF Y , and CF EC by 26.66% to 49.59%, 34.11% to 51.12%, and 25.35% to 41.47%, respectively. These treatments also increased NEEBs by 8.27% to 34.23%. Among them, OF + CRF1 and OF + CRF2 treatments achieved the highest NEEB. In summary, CRF treatments can balance ratoon rice yield and environmental benefits. Replacing part of the N with organic fertilizer further enhances annual yield and NEEBs.
Suggested Citation
Zijuan Ding & Jin Zeng & Zhilong He & Bo Zhu & Jiangwen Nie & Yong Zhou & Mengdie Jiang & Zhangyong Liu, 2025.
"Optimizing Fertilization Strategies to Reduce Carbon Footprints and Enhance Net Ecosystem Economic Benefits in Ratoon Rice Systems,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1715-:d:1720338
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1715-:d:1720338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.