IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i11p1231-d1672750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Preceding Crops, Soil Packing and Tillage System on Soil Compaction, Organic Carbon Content and Maize Yield

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Orzech

    (Department of Agroecosystems and Horticulture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Maria Wanic

    (Department of Agroecosystems and Horticulture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Dariusz Załuski

    (Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Crop rotation and simplified tillage affect soil properties and consequently crop yields. The use of heavy machinery in the tillage can affect soil degradation and reduce soil productivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of soil packing and different soil tillage methods applied before the sowing of maize cultivated after grassland and in monoculture on soil compaction, soil organic carbon content, and maize yield. A strip–split–plot experiment was conducted on-farm in northeastern Poland from 2017 to 2021. The soil compaction was measured in the soil layers: 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm in the leaf development stage (BBCH 19), the flowering stage (BBCH 67) and the maize kernel development stage (BBCH 79). The experimental factors were as follows: 1. preceding crop—grassland, maize; 2. degree of soil packing—without soil packing, soil packing after harvesting the preceding crop; 3. different soil tillage—conventional plough tillage method, reduced tillage method. Maize cultivation following a multi-species grassland resulted in a modest 1.47% increase in soil organic carbon content compared to continuous maize monoculture. In monoculture maize, all investigated reduced tillage methods led to increased soil compaction by 0.61–0.67 MPa. However, this adverse effect was mitigated by prior grassland cultivation. Maize grown after a multi-species grassland exhibited 14% higher silage mass yields. Considering the reduction in soil compaction and the enhanced yield potential, this preceding crop is recommended for maize cultivation. Although soil packing did not significantly impact maize yields, reduced tillage methods, such as subsoiling at 40 cm, medium ploughing at 20 cm, and passive tillage, led to a significant reduction in silage mass compared to other treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Orzech & Maria Wanic & Dariusz Załuski, 2025. "Effect of Preceding Crops, Soil Packing and Tillage System on Soil Compaction, Organic Carbon Content and Maize Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1231-:d:1672750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Ji & Y. Zhao & X. Mu & K. Liu & C. Li, 2013. "Effects of tillage on soil physical properties and root growth of maize in loam and clay in central China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(7), pages 295-302.
    2. S. Husnjak & D. Filipović & S. Košutić, 2002. "Influence of different tillage systems on soil physical properties and crop yield," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 48(6), pages 249-254.
    3. Peipei Yang & Wenxu Dong & Marius Heinen & Wei Qin & Oene Oenema, 2022. "Soil Compaction Prevention, Amelioration and Alleviation Measures Are Effective in Mechanized and Smallholder Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Cameron M. Pittelkow & Xinqiang Liang & Bruce A. Linquist & Kees Jan van Groenigen & Juhwan Lee & Mark E. Lundy & Natasja van Gestel & Johan Six & Rodney T. Venterea & Chris van Kessel, 2015. "Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 517(7534), pages 365-368, January.
    5. Václav Voltr & Jana Wollnerová & Pavel Fuksa & Martin Hruška, 2021. "Influence of Tillage on the Production Inputs, Outputs, Soil Compaction and GHG Emissions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoang Tuan, 2024. "Agricultural Practices and Climate Resilience: Case Study in Vietnam," International Journal of Climatic Studies, IPRJB, vol. 3(1), pages 24-36.
    2. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Monika Vilkiene & Ieva Mockeviciene & Grazina Kadziene & Danute Karcauskiene & Regina Repsiene & Ona Auskalniene, 2023. "Bacterial Communities: Interaction to Abiotic Conditions under Effect of Anthropogenic Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Nana Chen & Xin Zhao & Shuxian Dou & Aixing Deng & Chengyan Zheng & Tiehua Cao & Zhenwei Song & Weijian Zhang, 2023. "The Tradeoff between Maintaining Maize ( Zea mays L.) Productivity and Improving Soil Quality under Conservation Tillage Practice in Semi-Arid Region of Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    6. J. Carl Ureta & Lucas Clay & Marzieh Motallebi & Joan Ureta, 2020. "Quantifying the Landscape’s Ecological Benefits—An Analysis of the Effect of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Peipei Yang & Wenxu Dong & Marius Heinen & Wei Qin & Oene Oenema, 2022. "Soil Compaction Prevention, Amelioration and Alleviation Measures Are Effective in Mechanized and Smallholder Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Kwazi A. K. Mkhonta & Hussein Shimelis & Seltene Abady & Asande Ngidi, 2025. "Agronomic Performance of Newly Developed Elite Cowpea Mutant Lines in Eswatini," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Anantha, K.H. & Garg, Kaushal K. & Barron, Jennie & Dixit, Sreenath & Venkataradha, A. & Singh, Ramesh & Whitbread, Anthony M., 2021. "Impact of best management practices on sustainable crop production and climate resilience in smallholder farming systems of South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Luncheng You & Gerard H. Ros & Yongliang Chen & Qi Shao & Madaline D. Young & Fusuo Zhang & Wim de Vries, 2023. "Global mean nitrogen recovery efficiency in croplands can be enhanced by optimal nutrient, crop and soil management practices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Wondimagegn Tesfaye & Garrick Blalock & Nyasha Tirivayi, 2021. "Climate‐Smart Innovations and Rural Poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring Impacts and Pathways," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 878-899, May.
    12. Katharina Helming & Katrin Daedlow & Bernd Hansjürgens & Thomas Koellner, 2018. "Assessment and Governance of Sustainable Soil Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Heena Panchasara & Nahidul Hoque Samrat & Nahina Islam, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Mitigation Measures in Australian Agriculture Sector—A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Krzysztof Orzech & Maria Wanic & Dariusz Załuski, 2021. "The Effects of Soil Compaction and Different Tillage Systems on the Bulk Density and Moisture Content of Soil and the Yields of Winter Oilseed Rape and Cereals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Bacar Abdallah Abderemane & Malika Fakiri & Omar Idrissi & Aziz Baidani & Abdelmonim Zeroual & Elisabetta Mazzucotelli & Hakan Özkan & Ilaria Marcotuli & Agata Gadaleta & Chafika Houasli, 2023. "Evaluation of the Productive Potential of a World Collection of Chickpeas ( Cicer arietinum L.) for the Initiation of Breeding Programs for Adaptation to Conservation Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    16. Lalani, Baqir & Aminpour, Payam & Gray, Steven & Williams, Meredith & Büchi, Lucie & Haggar, Jeremy & Grabowski, Philip & Dambiro, José, 2021. "Mapping farmer perceptions, Conservation Agriculture practices and on-farm measurements: The role of systems thinking in the process of adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Kumara, T.M. Kiran & Kandpal, Ankita & Pal, Suresh, 2019. "Determinants and Impacts of Conservation Agriculture in South Asia: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidences," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 74(03), March.
    18. Tambo, J. & Mockshell, J., 2018. "Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277035, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Dazhuan Ge & Hualou Long & Li Ma & Yingnan Zhang & Shuangshuang Tu, 2017. "Analysis Framework of China’s Grain Production System: A Spatial Resilience Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Dardonville, Manon & Legrand, Baptiste & Clivot, Hugues & Bernardin, Claire & Bockstaller, Christian & Therond, Olivier, 2022. "Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1231-:d:1672750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.