IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i15p1631-d1711231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agronomic Performance of Newly Developed Elite Cowpea Mutant Lines in Eswatini

Author

Listed:
  • Kwazi A. K. Mkhonta

    (African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
    Department of Agricultural Research and Specialists Services (DARSS), Ministry of Agriculture, Malkerns M204, Eswatini)

  • Hussein Shimelis

    (African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)

  • Seltene Abady

    (African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)

  • Asande Ngidi

    (African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)

Abstract

Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp) is a vital food security crop in sub-Saharan Africa, including Eswatini. The productivity of the crop is low (<600 kg/ha) in the country due to a lack of improved, locally adapted, and farmer-preferred varieties with biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. The objective of the study was to assess the agronomic performance of newly developed elite cowpea mutants to select best-yielding and adapted pure lines for production and genetic improvement in Eswatini. A total of 30 cowpea genotypes, including 24 newly developed advanced mutant lines, their 3 founder parents and 3 local checks, were profiled for major agronomic traits in two selected sites (Lowveld Experiment and Malkerns Research Stations) using a 6 × 5 alpha lattice design with three replications. A combined analysis of variance revealed that the genotype x location interaction effects were significant ( p < 0.05) for germination percentage (DG %), days to flowering (DTF), days to maturity (DMT), number of pods per plant (NPP), pod length (PDL), number of seeds per pod (NSP), hundred seed weight (HSW), and grain yield (GYD). Elite mutant genotypes, including NKL9P7, BRR4P11, SHR9P5, and NKL9P7-2 exhibited higher grain yields at 3158.8 kg/ha, 2651.6 kg/ha, 2627.5 kg/ha, and 2255.8 kg/ha in that order. The highest-yielding mutant, NKL9P7, produced 70%, 61%, and 54% more grain yield than the check varieties Mtilane, Black Eye, and Accession 792, respectively. Furthermore, the selected genotypes displayed promising yield components such as better PDL (varying from 13.1 to 26.3 cm), NPP (15.9 to 26.8), and NSP (9.8 to 16.2). Grain yield had significant positive correlations ( p < 0.05) with DG %, NSP, and NPP. The principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that 81.5% of the total genotypic variation was attributable to the assessed quantitative traits. Principal component (PC) 1 accounted for 48.6%, while PC 2 and PC 3 contributed 18.9% and 14% of the overall variation, respectively. Key traits correlated with PC1 were NPP with a loading score of 0.91, NSP (0.83), PDL (0.73), GYD (0.68), HSW (0.58), DMT (−0.60), and DTF (−0.43) in a desirable direction. In conclusion, genotypes NKL9P7, BRR4P11, SHR9P5, NKL9P7-2, Bira, SHR3P4, and SHR2P7 were identified as complementary parents with relatively best yields and local adaptation, making them ideal selections for direct production or breeding. The following traits, NPP, NSP, PDL, GYD, and HSW, offered unique opportunities for genotype selection in the cowpea breeding program in Eswatini.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwazi A. K. Mkhonta & Hussein Shimelis & Seltene Abady & Asande Ngidi, 2025. "Agronomic Performance of Newly Developed Elite Cowpea Mutant Lines in Eswatini," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1631-:d:1711231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/15/1631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/15/1631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron M. Pittelkow & Xinqiang Liang & Bruce A. Linquist & Kees Jan van Groenigen & Juhwan Lee & Mark E. Lundy & Natasja van Gestel & Johan Six & Rodney T. Venterea & Chris van Kessel, 2015. "Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 517(7534), pages 365-368, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoang Tuan, 2024. "Agricultural Practices and Climate Resilience: Case Study in Vietnam," International Journal of Climatic Studies, IPRJB, vol. 3(1), pages 24-36.
    2. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Nana Chen & Xin Zhao & Shuxian Dou & Aixing Deng & Chengyan Zheng & Tiehua Cao & Zhenwei Song & Weijian Zhang, 2023. "The Tradeoff between Maintaining Maize ( Zea mays L.) Productivity and Improving Soil Quality under Conservation Tillage Practice in Semi-Arid Region of Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    5. J. Carl Ureta & Lucas Clay & Marzieh Motallebi & Joan Ureta, 2020. "Quantifying the Landscape’s Ecological Benefits—An Analysis of the Effect of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Peipei Yang & Wenxu Dong & Marius Heinen & Wei Qin & Oene Oenema, 2022. "Soil Compaction Prevention, Amelioration and Alleviation Measures Are Effective in Mechanized and Smallholder Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Anantha, K.H. & Garg, Kaushal K. & Barron, Jennie & Dixit, Sreenath & Venkataradha, A. & Singh, Ramesh & Whitbread, Anthony M., 2021. "Impact of best management practices on sustainable crop production and climate resilience in smallholder farming systems of South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Luncheng You & Gerard H. Ros & Yongliang Chen & Qi Shao & Madaline D. Young & Fusuo Zhang & Wim de Vries, 2023. "Global mean nitrogen recovery efficiency in croplands can be enhanced by optimal nutrient, crop and soil management practices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Wondimagegn Tesfaye & Garrick Blalock & Nyasha Tirivayi, 2021. "Climate‐Smart Innovations and Rural Poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring Impacts and Pathways," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 878-899, May.
    10. Katharina Helming & Katrin Daedlow & Bernd Hansjürgens & Thomas Koellner, 2018. "Assessment and Governance of Sustainable Soil Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Heena Panchasara & Nahidul Hoque Samrat & Nahina Islam, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Mitigation Measures in Australian Agriculture Sector—A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Bacar Abdallah Abderemane & Malika Fakiri & Omar Idrissi & Aziz Baidani & Abdelmonim Zeroual & Elisabetta Mazzucotelli & Hakan Özkan & Ilaria Marcotuli & Agata Gadaleta & Chafika Houasli, 2023. "Evaluation of the Productive Potential of a World Collection of Chickpeas ( Cicer arietinum L.) for the Initiation of Breeding Programs for Adaptation to Conservation Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Lalani, Baqir & Aminpour, Payam & Gray, Steven & Williams, Meredith & Büchi, Lucie & Haggar, Jeremy & Grabowski, Philip & Dambiro, José, 2021. "Mapping farmer perceptions, Conservation Agriculture practices and on-farm measurements: The role of systems thinking in the process of adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Kumara, T.M. Kiran & Kandpal, Ankita & Pal, Suresh, 2019. "Determinants and Impacts of Conservation Agriculture in South Asia: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidences," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 74(03), March.
    15. Tambo, J. & Mockshell, J., 2018. "Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277035, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Dazhuan Ge & Hualou Long & Li Ma & Yingnan Zhang & Shuangshuang Tu, 2017. "Analysis Framework of China’s Grain Production System: A Spatial Resilience Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Dardonville, Manon & Legrand, Baptiste & Clivot, Hugues & Bernardin, Claire & Bockstaller, Christian & Therond, Olivier, 2022. "Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    18. Alberts Auzins & Ieva Leimane & Agnese Krievina & Inga Morozova & Andris Miglavs & Peteris Lakovskis, 2023. "Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Performance of Crop Production in Relation to Crop Rotation, Catch Crops, and Tillage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Adam M. Komarek, 2018. "Conservation agriculture in western China increases productivity and profits without decreasing resilience," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(5), pages 1251-1262, October.
    20. Haowei Ni & Han Hu & Constantin M. Zohner & Weigen Huang & Ji Chen & Yishen Sun & Jixian Ding & Jizhong Zhou & Xiaoyuan Yan & Jiabao Zhang & Yuting Liang & Thomas W. Crowther, 2024. "Effects of winter soil warming on crop biomass carbon loss from organic matter degradation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1631-:d:1711231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.