IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i11p1204-d1669489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Benefits of Shelterbelts and Windbreaks: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Mihai Enescu

    (Department of Soils Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania, 59 Mărăști Boulevard, 1st District, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mircea Mihalache

    (Department of Soils Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania, 59 Mărăști Boulevard, 1st District, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Leonard Ilie

    (Department of Soils Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania, 59 Mărăști Boulevard, 1st District, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Lucian Dinca

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Eroilor 128, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Cristinel Constandache

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Eroilor 128, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Gabriel Murariu

    (Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Environmental, Dunărea de Jos University Galati, Românească Street No. 47, 800008 Galati, Romania)

Abstract

Forest shelterbelts and windbreaks play a vital role in protecting ecosystems, mitigating climate change effects, and enhancing agricultural productivity. These vegetative barriers serve as effective tools for soil conservation, reducing wind and water erosion while improving soil fertility. Additionally, they contribute to biodiversity preservation by providing habitat corridors for various plant and animal species. Their role in microclimate regulation, such as temperature moderation and increased humidity retention, further enhances agricultural yields and ecosystem stability. This study examines the historical evolution, design principles, and contemporary applications of forest shelterbelts and windbreaks, drawing insights from scientific research and case studies worldwide. It highlights the economic and environmental benefits, including improved air quality, carbon sequestration, and water management, making them crucial components of sustainable land use strategies. However, challenges such as land use competition, maintenance costs, and policy constraints are also analyzed, underscoring the need for integrated approaches to their management. Through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the existing literature and field studies, this paper emphasizes the necessity of strategic planning, community involvement, and adaptive policies to ensure the long-term sustainability of forest shelterbelts and windbreaks. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of their role in combating environmental degradation and promoting ecological resilience in the face of ongoing climate challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Mihai Enescu & Mircea Mihalache & Leonard Ilie & Lucian Dinca & Cristinel Constandache & Gabriel Murariu, 2025. "Agricultural Benefits of Shelterbelts and Windbreaks: A Bibliometric Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1204-:d:1669489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Ruppert & Martin Welp & Michael Spies & Niels Thevs, 2020. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Tree Shelterbelts on Agricultural Land in Rural Kyrgyzstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. David ŘEHÁČEK & Tomáš KHEL & Josef KUČERA & Jan VOPRAVIL & Martin PETERA, 2017. "Effect of windbreaks on wind speed reduction and soil protection against wind erosion," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 128-135.
    3. Haixiao Huang & Gay Y. Miller & Bruce J. Sherrick & Miguel I. Gómez, 2006. "Factors Influencing Illinois Farmland Values," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(2), pages 458-470.
    4. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Tauni, Muhammad Zubair & Zhang, Hongxia & Lirong, Xing, 2022. "Extreme weather events risk to crop-production and the adaptation of innovative management strategies to mitigate the risk: A retrospective survey of rural Punjab, Pakistan," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Editors: & Schoeneberger, Michele M. & Bentrup, Gary & Patel-Weynand, Toral, 2017. "Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S. Agricultural Landscapes Under Changing Conditions," USDA Miscellaneous 344570, United States Department of Agriculture.
    6. E. Elahi & Z. Khalid & Muhammad Zubair Tauni & H. Zhang & X. Lirong, 2022. "Extreme Weather Events Risk to Crop-Production and the Adaptation of Innovative Management Strategies to Mitigate the Risk: A Retrospective Survey of Rural Punjab, Pakistan," Post-Print hal-04452845, HAL.
    7. Voichita Timis-Gansac & Lucian Dinca & Cristinel Constandache & Gabriel Murariu & Gabriel Cheregi & Claudia Simona Cleopatra Timofte, 2025. "Conservation Biodiversity in Arid Areas: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Xuelu Cai & Mark Henderson & Ligang Wang & Yuanhang Su & Binhui Liu, 2021. "Shelterbelt Structure and Crop Protection from Increased Typhoon Activity in Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Maik Veste & Thomas Littmann & Anton Kunneke & Ben du Toit & Thomas Seifert, 2020. "Windbreaks as part of climate-smart landscapes reduce evapotranspiration in vineyards, Western Cape Province, South Africa," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(3), pages 119-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng Miao & Jing Xie & Yingdong Li, 2024. "Evaluating the risk and its acceptability of crop yield reduction in Northwest China under the impact of wind hail disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(15), pages 14027-14048, December.
    2. Neamat Allah Madadizadeh & Hossein Arzani & Seyed Akbar Javadi & Seyed Hamid Movahed Mohammadi & Mohammad Hossein Razzaghi, 2024. "Pro‐environmental intention toward sustainable rangeland's management; application of protection motivation and cultural theories," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 404-434, May.
    3. Liwei Liu & Tianli Zhu & Yingjie Dai, 2024. "Evaluation of Agricultural Sustainable Development and Analysis of Coupling Coordination in Food Security Areas from the Perspective of Food Security," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    4. Xiaochun Zhao & Danjie Yang & Xin Duan, 2024. "Temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and decoupling trend of Chinese agricultural carbon emission efficiency," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Gao Chao & Meixue Feng, 2022. "Rural Ecological Environment Promotes the Improvement of the Mechanism of Bilateral Economic Interest Connection between Agricultural Enterprises and Farmers under the New Retail Format," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Schilling, Brian J. & Sullivan, Kevin P. & Duke, Joshua M., 2013. "Do Residual Development Options Increase Preserved Farmland Values?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-17.
    8. Peng, Benhong & Zhao, Yinyin & Elahi, Ehsan & Wan, Anxia, 2023. "Can third-party market cooperation solve the dilemma of emissions reduction? A case study of energy investment project conflict analysis in the context of carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    9. repec:zbw:inwedp:582015 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Curtiss, Jarmila & Jelínek, Ladislav & Hruška, Martin & Medonos, Tomáš & Vilhelm, Václav, 2013. "The Effect of Heterogeneous Buyers on Agricultural Land Prices: The Case of the Czech Land Market," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 62(2).
    11. Baylis, Kathy & Paulson, Nicholas D. & Piras, Gianfranco, 2011. "Spatial Approaches to Panel Data in Agricultural Economics: A Climate Change Application," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 325-338, August.
    12. Wen-Chi Yang & Wen-Min Lu, 2023. "Achieving Net Zero—An Illustration of Carbon Emissions Reduction with A New Meta-Inverse DEA Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Khalid Haniza, 2015. "Spatial heterogeneity and spatial bias analyses in hedonic price models: some practical considerations," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(28), pages 113-128, June.
    14. Huitao Shen & Tao Zhang & Yanxia Zhao & Aibin Wu & Zhenhua Zheng & Jiansheng Cao, 2023. "Effects of Precipitation Variation on Annual and Winter Soil Respiration in a Semiarid Mountain Shrubland in Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Feichtinger, Paul & Salhofer, Klaus, 2013. "A Spatial Analysis of Agricultural Land Prices in Bavaria," Working papers 160741, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    16. Xinyue Yang & Martin Odening & Matthias Ritter, 2019. "The Spatial and Temporal Diffusion of Agricultural Land Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 95(1), pages 108-123.
    17. Yan Zhao & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Xuegang Sun & Fang Sun, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Choumert, Johanna & Phélinas, Pascale, 2014. "A Hedonic Analysis Of Agricultural Land Values In A Gm Soybean Area Of Argentina," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182750, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Hongkun Ma & Hao Zhu & Shuhan Ren & Rudi Liu & Cuixia Qiao, 2023. "The Impact of Government-Led Farmland Construction on Market-Oriented Farmland Transfer—Evidence from Shandong, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    20. Kasin Ransikarbum & Wattana Chanthakhot & Tony Glimm & Jettarat Janmontree, 2023. "Evaluation of Sourcing Decision for Hydrogen Supply Chain Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    21. Jiachen Ning & Pingyu Zhang & Qifeng Yang & Zuopeng Ma, 2023. "Spatial Pattern of Farmland Transfer in Liaoning Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1204-:d:1669489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.