IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2024i1p73-d1557413.html

Effects of Different Straw Return Methods on Farmland Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Hua

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China
    Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    Northern Agriculture and Livestock Husbandry Technology Innovation Center, Hohhot 010000, China
    Zibo Institute for Digital Agriculture and Rural Research, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Yang Gao

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China)

  • Dingyang Li

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China)

  • Zhenxing Yang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China)

  • Zhiping Liu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China)

Abstract

Straw return is an effective agricultural measure that influences the ecological environment. In the context of global climate change and the need for sustainable development, it is essential to explore how straw return methods affect the environment. This study conducted a two-year field experiment comparing different straw return treatments: no straw return (CK), straw return directly (SR), and straw returned in deep ditches (ISR). The results showed that SR treatment increased soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (21.7~25.8%) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) (8.5~43.8%) compared to CK. The ISR treatment significantly enhanced DOC (13.1~33.0%) and DON (14.2~50.8%). Both SR and ISR treatments also improved maize growth indicators, such as leaf area index (LAI), stem biomass, leaf biomass, and grain biomass. In terms of environmental effects, the ISR measure reduced N 2 O emissions and significantly lowered the carbon footprint (CF) and water footprint (WF). Specifically, the yield-scale carbon footprint (CF y ) and yield-scale water footprint (WF y ) of ISR were reduced by 12.0% and 9.1%, respectively, in 2023. Correlation analysis revealed that soil DON and DOC were key factors in these environmental benefits. Furthermore, the reduction in WF and CF was closely linked to the increased SWC and higher biomass in all maize organs. Therefore, we demonstrated that the ISR measure not only promotes maize biomass accumulation but also effectively mitigates carbon emissions and water consumption on farmland. It may be related to the boosting soil DON and DOC levels. Overall, the ISR method holds promise for supporting sustainable farming practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Hua & Yang Gao & Dingyang Li & Zhenxing Yang & Zhiping Liu, 2024. "Effects of Different Straw Return Methods on Farmland Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:73-:d:1557413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bocchiola, D., 2015. "Impact of potential climate change on crop yield and water footprint of rice in the Po valley of Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 223-237.
    2. Guo, Ru & Qian, Rui & Du, Luning & Sun, Weili & Wang, Jinjin & Cai, Tie & Zhang, Peng & Jia, Zhikuan & Ren, Xiaolong & Chen, Xiaoli, 2024. "Straw-derived biochar optimizes water consumption, shoot and root characteristics to improve water productivity of maize under reduced nitrogen," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    3. Wang, Linlin & Li, Lingling & Xie, Junhong & Luo, Zhuzhu & Sumera, Anwar & Zechariah, Effah & Fudjoe, Setor Kwami & Palta, Jairo A. & Chen, Yinglong, 2022. "Does plastic mulching reduce water footprint in field crops in China? A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Li, Yue & Chen, Hao & Feng, Hao & Dong, Qin’ge & Wu, Wenjie & Zou, Yufeng & Chau, Henry Wai & Siddique, Kadambot H.M., 2020. "Influence of straw incorporation on soil water utilization and summer maize productivity: A five-year field study on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Vincent Humphrey & Alexis Berg & Philippe Ciais & Pierre Gentine & Martin Jung & Markus Reichstein & Sonia I. Seneviratne & Christian Frankenberg, 2021. "Soil moisture–atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7852), pages 65-69, April.
    6. Salazar, Osvaldo & Balboa, Liliana & Peralta, Kiri & Rossi, Michel & Casanova, Manuel & Tapia, Yasna & Singh, Ranvir & Quemada, Miguel, 2019. "Effect of cover crops on leaching of dissolved organic nitrogen and carbon in a maize-cover crop rotation in Mediterranean Central Chile," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 399-406.
    7. Yisheng Lou & Xu Zhang & Shiyu Zhang & Na Li & Yidong Zhao & Wei Bai & Zhanxiang Sun & Zhe Zhang, 2024. "Effects of Straw Input on the Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Spring Maize in Film-Mulched Farmland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueqin Jiang & Shanjun Luo & Qin Ye & Xican Li & Weihua Jiao, 2022. "Hyperspectral Estimates of Soil Moisture Content Incorporating Harmonic Indicators and Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Ao, Chang & Zhang, Zhongmou & Li, Honghu & Yu, Jin & Xing, Weimin & Zeng, Wenzhi & Liu, Yi, 2025. "Greenhouse gas emission and its sensitivity parameters under controlled irrigation in cold-region paddy fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    3. Zefeng Chen & Alessandro Cescatti & Ruofei Xing & Giovanni Forzieri, 2026. "Emergent constraints on the hydrological impacts of land use and land cover change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Yana Zou & Xiangrong Wang, 2025. "Analysis of Influencing Factors of Terrestrial Carbon Sinks in China Based on LightGBM Model and Bayesian Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-32, May.
    5. Bocchiola, D. & Brunetti, L. & Soncini, A. & Polinelli, F. & Gianinetto, M., 2019. "Impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and food security in the Himalayas: A case study in Nepal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 113-125.
    6. Ayomide Hannah Igbaroola & Katarzyna Woźniak-Jasińska & Agnieszka Sapa, 2025. "What factors truly drive crop virtual water trade? A systematic literature review," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Kyle Lesinger & Di Tian, 2025. "Skillful subseasonal soil moisture drought forecasts with deep learning-dynamic models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Pacetti, Tommaso & Renzi, Niccolò & Lompi, Marco & Setti, Andrea & Spinelli, Daniele & Castelli, Giulio & Bresci, Elena & Caporali, Enrica, 2025. "Water footprint and water productivity analysis of an alternative organic mulching technology for irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    9. Xiangzhong Luo & Trevor F. Keenan, 2022. "Tropical extreme droughts drive long-term increase in atmospheric CO2 growth rate variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Andrisa Balbinot & Anderson da Rosa Feijó & Marcus Vinicius Fipke & Dalvane Rockenbach & Joseph Harry Massey & Edinalvo Rabaioli Camargo & Marcia Foster Mesko & Priscila Tessmer Scaglioni & Luis Anton, 2021. "Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO 2 Concentration and Water Regime on Rice Yield, Water Use Efficiency, and Arsenic and Cadmium Accumulation in Grain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, July.
    11. Elsadig Omer & Dora Szlatenyi & Sándor Csenki & Jomana Alrwashdeh & Ivan Czako & Vince Láng, 2024. "Farming Practice Variability and Its Implications for Soil Health in Agriculture: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Toro-Mujica, Paula & Aguilar, Claudio & Vera, Raúl & Cornejo, Karen, 2016. "A simulation-based approach for evaluating the effects of farm type, management, and rainfall on the water footprint of sheep grazing systems in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 75-85.
    13. Md Elias Hossain & Xurong Mei & Wenying Zhang & Wenyi Dong & Zhenxing Yan & Xiu Liu & Saxena Rachit & Subramaniam Gopalakrishnan & Enke Liu, 2021. "Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer Affects Soil Total Nitrogen and Its Fractions in Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Saurav Das & Sahila Beegum & Bharat Sharma Acharya & Dinesh Panday, 2025. "Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Mechanistic Perspective on Limitations and Future Possibilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-33, June.
    15. Boglárka Bozóki & Amare Assefa Bogale & Hussein Khaeim & Zoltán Kende & Barbara Simon & Gergő Péter Kovács & Csaba Gyuricza, 2025. "Impact of Soil Tillage Systems on CO 2 Emissions, Soil Chemical Parameters, and Plant Growth Physiological Parameters (LAI, SPAD) in a Long-Term Tillage Experiment in Hungary," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    16. Chen, Hang & Wu, Wei & Li, Chen & Lu, Gang & Ye, Deli & Ma, Chao & Ren, Lei & Li, Guodong, 2025. "Temporal variations and driving mechanisms of carbon and water fluxes in desert photovoltaic ecosystems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Gerkani Nezhad Moshizi, Zahra & Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin & Ramezani Etedali, Hadi & Esmaeilpour, Yahya & Collins, Brain, 2023. "Application of inclusive multiple model for the prediction of saffron water footprint," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    18. Zhaoxue Gai & Wenlu Zheng & Bonoua Faye & Hongyan Wang & Guoming Du, 2024. "Temporal and Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Carbon Storage in Black Soil Area Under Topographic Gradient," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Li, Xuechun & Chen, Dan & Cao, Xinchun & Luo, Zhaohui & Webber, Michael, 2020. "Assessing the components of, and factors influencing, paddy rice water footprint in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Yangyang Wu & Jinli Yang & Siliang Li & Chunzi Guo & Xiaodong Yang & Yue Xu & Fujun Yue & Haijun Peng & Yinchuan Chen & Lei Gu & Zhenghua Shi & Guangjie Luo, 2023. "NDVI-Based Vegetation Dynamics and Their Responses to Climate Change and Human Activities from 2000 to 2020 in Miaoling Karst Mountain Area, SW China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:73-:d:1557413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.