IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i7p1299-d1178987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Discovery and Diagnosis Using Temporal-Association-Rule-Mining-Based Approach for Threshing Cylinder Blockage

Author

Listed:
  • Yehong Liu

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xin Wang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Dong Dai

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Can Tang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xu Mao

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Du Chen

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yawei Zhang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shumao Wang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Accurately diagnosing blockages in a threshing cylinder is crucial for ensuring efficiency and quality in combine harvester operations. However, in terms of blockage diagnostic methods, the current state of affairs is characterized by model-based approaches that can be highly time-consuming and difficult to implement, while data-driven approaches lack interpretability. To address this situation, we propose a temporal association rule mining (TARM)-based fault diagnosis method for identifying threshing cylinder blockages and discovering knowledge. This study performs field trials by varying the actual feed rate and obtains datasets for three blockage classes (slight, moderate, and severe). Firstly, a symbolic aggregate approximation (SAX) method is employed to reduce the data dimensionality and to construct the transaction set with a sliding window. Next, a cSpade method is used to mine and extract strong association rules by applying improved support, confidence, and lift indicators. With the established strong association rules, this study can comprehensively elucidate the variation pattern of each characteristic under several blockage failure conditions and can effectively identify blockage faults. The results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively distinguishes between three levels of blockage faults, achieving an overall diagnostic accuracy of 0.94. And the method yields precisions of 0.90, 0.92, and 0.99 and corresponding recalls of 0.90, 0.93, and 0.98 for slight, medium, and severe levels of blockage faults, respectively. Specifically, the knowledge acquired from the extracted strong association rules can effectively explain the operational characteristics of a combine harvester when its threshing cylinders are blocked. Furthermore, the proposed approach in this study can provide a reasonable and reliable reference for future research on threshing cylinder blockages.

Suggested Citation

  • Yehong Liu & Xin Wang & Dong Dai & Can Tang & Xu Mao & Du Chen & Yawei Zhang & Shumao Wang, 2023. "Knowledge Discovery and Diagnosis Using Temporal-Association-Rule-Mining-Based Approach for Threshing Cylinder Blockage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1299-:d:1178987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weipeng Zhang & Bo Zhao & Liming Zhou & Jizhong Wang & Kang Niu & Fengzhu Wang & Ruixue Wang, 2022. "Research on Comprehensive Operation and Maintenance Based on the Fault Diagnosis System of Combine Harvester," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Yin, Shi & Liu, Hui, 2022. "Wind power prediction based on outlier correction, ensemble reinforcement learning, and residual correction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Wolfert, Sjaak & Ge, Lan & Verdouw, Cor & Bogaardt, Marc-Jeroen, 2017. "Big Data in Smart Farming – A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 69-80.
    4. Mohd Khanapi Abd Ghani & Nasir G. Noma & Mazin Abed Mohammed & Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem & Begonya Garcia-Zapirain & Mashael S. Maashi & Salama A. Mostafa, 2021. "Innovative Artificial Intelligence Approach for Hearing-Loss Symptoms Identification Model Using Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-30, May.
    5. Tan Wang & Xianbao Xu & Cong Wang & Zhen Li & Daoliang Li, 2021. "From Smart Farming towards Unmanned Farms: A New Mode of Agricultural Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hrosul, Viktoriia & Kruhlova, Olena & Kolesnyk, Alina, 2023. "Digitalization of the agricultural sector: the impact of ICT on the development of enterprises in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    2. Pigford, Ashlee-Ann E. & Hickey, Gordon M. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2018. "Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 116-121.
    3. Hrosul, Viktoriia & Kruhlova, Olena & Kolesnyk, Alina, 2023. "Digitization of the Agricultural Sector: The Impact of ICT on the Development of Enterprises in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), January.
    4. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    5. Divya Suresh & Abhishek Choudhury & Yinjia Zhang & Zhiying Zhao & Rajib Shaw, 2024. "The Role of Data-Driven Agritech Startups—The Case of India and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Haoling Ren & Jiangdong Wu & Tianliang Lin & Yu Yao & Chang Liu, 2023. "Research on an Intelligent Agricultural Machinery Unmanned Driving System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Hidalgo, Francisco & Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F. & Birkenberg, Athena & Daum, Thomas & Bosch, Christine & Hirsch, Patrick & Birner, Regina, 2023. "Digitalization, sustainability, and coffee. Opportunities and challenges for agricultural development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    8. Madhu Khanna & Shady S. Atallah & Saurajyoti Kar & Bijay Sharma & Linghui Wu & Chengzheng Yu & Girish Chowdhary & Chinmay Soman & Kaiyu Guan, 2022. "Digital transformation for a sustainable agriculture in the United States: Opportunities and challenges," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(6), pages 924-937, November.
    9. Víctor M. Albornoz & Lia C. Araneda & Rodrigo Ortega, 2022. "Planning and scheduling of selective harvest with management zones delineation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 873-890, September.
    10. Jingmei Gao & Zahid Sarwar, 2024. "How do firms create business value and dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics management capability?," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 283-304, September.
    11. Shebanina, Olena & Burkovska, Anna & Petrenko, Vadym & Burkovska, Alla, 2023. "Economic planning at agricultural enterprises: Ukrainian experience of increasing the availability of data in the context of food security," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    12. Shen, Zhiyang & Wang, Songkai & Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Hao, Yu, 2022. "Digital transition and green growth in Chinese agriculture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    13. Salembier, Chloé & Segrestin, Blanche & Sinoir, Nicolas & Templier, Joseph & Weil, Benoît & Meynard, Jean-Marc, 2020. "Design of equipment for agroecology: Coupled innovation processes led by farmer-designers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Pereira, Karine Vargas & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & Michelin, Cláudia de Freitas & Rigo, Paula Donaduzzi & Quiroga, Daniel Oscar & Manosso, Thayane Sviercoski, 2024. "Factors that impact on Brazilian rural producers’ decision-making: A systematic literature review," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 15(02), June.
    15. Norman Siebrecht, 2020. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap—Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Ashfield, Austen & Mullan, Conall & Jack, Claire, 2020. "Encouraging farmer participation in agricultural education and training: A Northern Ireland perspective," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 9, November.
    17. Gackstetter, David & von Bloh, Malte & Hannus, Veronika & Meyer, Sebastian T. & Weisser, Wolfgang & Luksch, Claudia & Asseng, Senthold, 2023. "Autonomous field management – An enabler of sustainable future in agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Liu, Ling & Wang, Jujie & Li, Jianping & Wei, Lu, 2023. "Dual-meta pool method for wind farm power forecasting with small sample data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    19. Dixit, Krishna & Aashish, Kumar & Kumar Dwivedi, Amit, 2023. "Antecedents of smart farming adoption to mitigate the digital divide – extended innovation diffusion model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Matthias Senft & Ulrike Stahl & Nikolai Svoboda, 2022. "Research data management in agricultural sciences in Germany: We are not yet where we want to be," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1299-:d:1178987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.