IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i12p2194-d1286727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability, Productivity, and Technical Efficiency of Cretan Olive Groves across Alternative Ecological Farm Types

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Sintori

    (Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA, 111 45 Athens, Greece)

  • Vasilia Konstantidelli

    (Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA, 111 45 Athens, Greece
    Department of Agricultural Economics, Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens (A.U.A.), 118 55 Athens, Greece)

  • Penelope Gouta

    (Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA, 111 45 Athens, Greece
    Department of Agricultural Economics, Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens (A.U.A.), 118 55 Athens, Greece)

  • Irene Tzouramani

    (Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA, 111 45 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Olive groves are an important element of the Mediterranean landscape and heritage and contribute significantly to the area’s rural economies. The primary interest of researchers and policymakers lies in the economic performance of this activity, especially in light of the resource limitations imposed by climate change. Profitability and productivity analyses, as well as technical efficiency methodologies, have been applied to evaluate the economic sustainability of olive cultivation and have often identified shortcomings in farms’ management and structure. In our study, we use profitability and productivity indicators, as well as data envelopment analysis, to estimate the economic performance of Cretan olive groves and a second-stage regression analysis to determine factors that affect efficiency scores. One novelty of this study is that the results are presented across alternative ecological approaches, i.e., organic, conservation, low-input, and standard farms. Our findings indicate that organic farms perform better in the examined economic indicators. On the other hand, standard farms demonstrate a low labour productivity, while conservation and low-input farms exhibit an inefficient use of capital. Scale inefficiencies indicate that certain farm types should also increase in size to be more competitive. Finally, our analysis suggests that training, market orientation, and a commitment to farming positively affect the efficiency of olive groves.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Sintori & Vasilia Konstantidelli & Penelope Gouta & Irene Tzouramani, 2023. "Profitability, Productivity, and Technical Efficiency of Cretan Olive Groves across Alternative Ecological Farm Types," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:2194-:d:1286727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/12/2194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/12/2194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Agnieszka Strzelecka & Danuta Zawadzka, 2021. "The Impact of Crop Diversification on the Economic Efficiency of Small Farms in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Oleg Badunenko & Pavlo Mozharovskyi, 2016. "Nonparametric frontier analysis using Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 16(3), pages 550-589, September.
    3. John S. Liu & Louis Y. Y. Lu & Wen-Min Lu, 2016. "Research Fronts and Prevailing Applications in Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 543-574, Springer.
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    5. Theodoridis, A.M. & Psychoudakis, A. & Christofi, A., 2006. "Data Envelopment Analysis as a Complement to Marginal Analysis," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Fare, Rolf & Knox Lovell, C. A., 1978. "Measuring the technical efficiency of production," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 150-162, October.
    7. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    8. Lassaad Lachaal & Boubaker Karray & Boubaker Dhehibi & Ali Chebil, 2005. "Technical Efficiency Measures and Its Determinants for Olive Producing Farms in Tunisia: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 17(3), pages 580-591.
    9. Yong-bae Ji & Choonjoo Lee, 2010. "Data envelopment analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(2), pages 267-280, June.
    10. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorota Ciołek & Anna Golejewska, 2022. "Efficiency Determinants of Regional Innovation Systems in Polish Subregions," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 24-45.
    2. Alexandra Sintori & Penelope Gouta & Vasilia Konstantidelli & Irene Tzouramani, 2024. "Eco-Efficiency of Olive Farms across Diversified Ecological Farming Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Ioannis E. Tsolas, 2020. "Financial Performance Assessment of Construction Firms by Means of RAM-Based Composite Indicators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Alexandra Sintori & Angelos Liontakis & Irene Tzouramani, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Efficiency of Greek Dairy Sheep Farms: GHG Emissions and Mitigation Potential," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Weekx, Simon & Buyle, Sven, 2023. "The effect of airline dominance on airport performance: Empirical evidence from medium-sized European airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Helmi Hammami & Thanh Ngo & David Tripe & Dinh-Tri Vo, 2022. "Ranking with a Euclidean common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: with application to the Eurozone banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 675-694, April.
    7. Oleg Badunenko & Harald Tauchmann, 2019. "Simar and Wilson two-stage efficiency analysis for Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(4), pages 950-988, December.
    8. Vittadini, Giorgio & Sturaro, Caterina & Folloni, Giuseppe, 2022. "Non-Cognitive Skills and Cognitive Skills to measure school efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Yaron, Jacob & Meoli, Michele, 2017. "Assessing the financial and outreach efficiency of microfinance institutions: Do age and size matter?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 63-76.
    10. Thanh Ngo & Kan Wai Hong Tsui, 2022. "Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3411-3434, September.
    11. Cheng, Gang & Qian, Zhenhua, 2011. "Dea数据标准化方法及其在方向距离函数模型中的应用 [Data normalization for data envelopment analysis and its application to directional distance function]," MPRA Paper 31995, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Thu Trang Tran Nguyen & Hai Ha Le & Thi Minh Hop Ho & Thomas Dogot & Philippe Burny & Thi Nga Bui & Philippe Lebailly, 2020. "Efficiency Analysis of the Progress of Orange Farms in Tuyen Quang Province, Vietnam towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2018. "Econometric Analysis of Productivity: Theory and Implementation in R," Working Papers 18-008, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    14. Cláudia Braz & Sónia Cabral, 2023. "A macro approach to the relative efficiency of the Portuguese health system," Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles and Banco de Portugal Economic Studies, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    15. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    16. G Souza & M Souza & E Gomes, 2011. "Computing confidence intervals for output-oriented DEA models: an application to agricultural research in Brazil," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(10), pages 1844-1850, October.
    17. Neves Bezerra de Melo, Felipe Luiz & Sampaio, Raquel Menezes Bezerra & Sampaio, Luciano Menezes Bezerra, 2018. "Efficiency, productivity gains, and the size of Brazilian supermarkets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 99-111.
    18. Lucio Cecchini & Francesco Romagnoli & Massimo Chiorri & Biancamaria Torquati, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency and Its Determinants: The Case of the Italian Beef Cattle Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Castillo, Leopoldo Laborda & Guasch, Jose Luis, 2012. "Overdraft facility policy and firm performance : an empirical analysis in eastern European Union industrial firms," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6101, The World Bank.
    20. Jindal, Abhinav & Nilakantan, Rahul, 2021. "Falling efficiency levels of Indian coal-fired power plants: A slacks-based analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:2194-:d:1286727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.