IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i6p788-d828297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Different Doses of Phosgreen Fertilization on Chlorophyll, K, and Ca Content in Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) Grown in Peat Substrate

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Jama-Rodzeńska

    (Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24 A, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Piotr Chohura

    (Department of Horticulture, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24 A, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Bernard Gałka

    (Institute of Soil Science and Environmental Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Anna Szuba-Trznadel

    (Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, J. Chełmonskiego 38d, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Falkiewicz

    (Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24 A, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Monika Białkowska

    (Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24 A, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Struvite is regarded as a promising phosphorus (P) fertilizer compared to commercial pristine mineral phosphorus fertilizers. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Phosgreen fertilizer, with struvite as its phosphorus source, on the chlorophyll, potassium (K), and calcium (Ca) contents in lettuce grown in peat compared to superphosphate. The study was carried out as a pot experiment with different doses of P fertilization. The study presents the chlorophyll a, b, total (a + b) chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents of the lettuce plants. Significant differences in the chlorophyll a and b contents were observed between the different phosphorus applications, and this can have a direct impact on the crop yields. Significantly higher contents of both chlorophyll contents were observed under Phosgreen fertilization as well as the chlorophyll a + b content *. The results of the study on lettuce indicate a dependence of vitamin C content on phosphorus fertilizer, but with no significant increase under Phosgreen fertilization; the contents of K and Ca were not significantly dependent on the type of phosphorus fertilizer. Due to the favorable composition of Phosgreen, it may be recommended for use as a phosphorus fertilizer in the agriculture and horticulture sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Jama-Rodzeńska & Piotr Chohura & Bernard Gałka & Anna Szuba-Trznadel & Agnieszka Falkiewicz & Monika Białkowska, 2022. "Effect of Different Doses of Phosgreen Fertilization on Chlorophyll, K, and Ca Content in Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) Grown in Peat Substrate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:788-:d:828297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/6/788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/6/788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Jama-Rodzeńska & Piotr Chochura & Bernard Gałka & Anna Szuba-Trznadel & Zlatko Svecnjak & Dragana Latkovic, 2021. "Effect of Various Rates of P from Alternative and Traditional Sources on Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) Grown on Peat Substrate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Dana Cordell & Stuart White, 2011. "Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate about Long-Term Phosphorus Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Egle, Lukas & Rechberger, Helmut & Zessner, Matthias, 2015. "Overview and description of technologies for recovering phosphorus from municipal wastewater," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PB), pages 325-346.
    4. Magdalena Szymańska & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Tomasz Sosulski & Gijs W.P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2019. "Struvite—An Innovative Fertilizer from Anaerobic Digestate Produced in a Bio-Refinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, January.
    5. Marissa A. De Boer & Anjelika G. Romeo-Hall & Tomas M. Rooimans & J. Chris Slootweg, 2018. "An Assessment of the Drivers and Barriers for the Deployment of Urban Phosphorus Recovery Technologies: A Case Study of The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Theresia Sri Budiastuti & Djoko Purnomo & Bambang Pujiasmanto & Desy Setyaningrum, 2023. "Response of Maize Yield and Nutrient Uptake to Indigenous Organic Fertilizer from Corn Cobs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. J. A. Kleinman & R. D. Harmel, 2024. "Grappling with the success and trade-offs of global nutrient redistribution," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 29793-29811, December.
    2. Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Sustainable Mineral Resource Management—Insights into the Case of Phosphorus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    3. Kataki, Sampriti & West, Helen & Clarke, Michèle & Baruah, D.C., 2016. "Phosphorus recovery as struvite: Recent concerns for use of seed, alternative Mg source, nitrogen conservation and fertilizer potential," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 142-156.
    4. Daniel Reißmann & Daniela Thrän & Alberto Bezama, 2018. "Key Development Factors of Hydrothermal Processes in Germany by 2030: A Fuzzy Logic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Karel Mulder, 2019. "Future Options for Sewage and Drainage Systems Three Scenarios for Transitions and Continuity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Marissa A. De Boer & Anjelika G. Romeo-Hall & Tomas M. Rooimans & J. Chris Slootweg, 2018. "An Assessment of the Drivers and Barriers for the Deployment of Urban Phosphorus Recovery Technologies: A Case Study of The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Magdalena Szymańska & Tomasz Sosulski & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Gijs W.P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2019. "Ammonium Sulphate from a Bio-Refinery System as a Fertilizer—Agronomic and Economic Effectiveness on the Farm Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Heiner Brookman & Fabian Gievers & Volker Zelinski & Jan Ohlert & Achim Loewen, 2018. "Influence of Hydrothermal Carbonization on Composition, Formation and Elimination of Biphenyls, Dioxins and Furans in Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Aftab Ali Kubar & Qing Huang & Kashif Ali Kubar & Muhammad Amjad Khan & Muhammad Sajjad & Sumaira Gul & Chen Yang & Qingqing Wang & Genmao Guo & Ghulam Mustafa Kubar & Muhammad Ibrahim Kubar & Niaz Ah, 2022. "Ammonium and Phosphate Recovery from Biogas Slurry: Multivariate Statistical Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Benjamin C. McLellan & Eiji Yamasue & Tetsuo Tezuka & Glen Corder & Artem Golev & Damien Giurco, 2016. "Critical Minerals and Energy–Impacts and Limitations of Moving to Unconventional Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-40, May.
    11. Baum, Seth D. & Handoh, Itsuki C., 2014. "Integrating the planetary boundaries and global catastrophic risk paradigms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 13-21.
    12. Zhe Wang & Shuai Guan & Yajuan Wang & Wen Li & Ke Shi & Jiake Li & Zhiqiang Xu, 2022. "High Purity Struvite Recovery from Hydrothermally-Treated Sludge Supernatant Using Magnetic Zirconia Adsorbent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Roberta Mavugara & Mark Makomborero Matsa, 2024. "Resource Recovery from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants: the Zimbabwean Perspective," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 363-386, March.
    14. Gabriel Gerner & Jae Wook Chung & Luca Meyer & Rahel Wanner & Simon Heiniger & Daniel Seiler & Rolf Krebs & Alexander Treichler & Roman Kontic & Beatrice Kulli, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge: New Improvements in Phosphatic Fertilizer Production and Process Water Treatment Using Freeze Concentration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Marcin Sońta & Andrzej Łozicki & Magdalena Szymańska & Tomasz Sosulski & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Gijs W. P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2020. "Duckweed from a Biorefinery System: Nutrient Recovery Efficiency and Forage Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Theobald, Tim F.H. & Schipper, Mark & Kern, Jürgen, 2016. "Phosphorus flows in Berlin-Brandenburg, a regional flow analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-14.
    17. Hadin, Åsa & Eriksson, Ola & Hillman, Karl, 2016. "A review of potential critical factors in horse keeping for anaerobic digestion of horse manure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 432-442.
    18. Houssini, Khaoula & Geng, Yong & Liu, Jing-Yu & Zeng, Xianlai & Hohl, Simon V., 2023. "Measuring anthropogenic phosphorus cycles to promote resource recovery and circularity in Morocco," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Augusto Bianchini & Jessica Rossi, 2020. "An Integrated Industry-Based Methodology to Unlock Full-Scale Implementation of Phosphorus Recovery Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Stanley Udochukwu Ofoegbu, 2019. "Technological Challenges of Phosphorus Removal in High-Phosphorus Ores: Sustainability Implications and Possibilities for Greener Ore Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-38, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:788-:d:828297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.