IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i12d10.1007_s10668-023-03846-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grappling with the success and trade-offs of global nutrient redistribution

Author

Listed:
  • P. J. A. Kleinman

    (USDA Agricultural Research Service, Center for Agricultural Resources Research)

  • R. D. Harmel

    (USDA Agricultural Research Service, Center for Agricultural Resources Research)

Abstract

Inputs of fertilizer nutrients in agriculture are estimated to have contributed to > 40% increase in crop production over the past century, resulting in widespread benefits to food security and prosperity. However, fertilizer nutrient redistribution has fundamentally altered global and local nutrient cycles alike, yielding trade-offs in socioeconomic and environmental outcomes. David Pimentel’s body of work on the management of energy, water, and soil resources in agriculture, along with his perspectives on agronomy and sustainable resource management, resonates with a critical understanding of the consequences of nutrient redistribution in agriculture. With Pimentel's legacy in mind, we consider trade-offs of global nutrient redistribution, improved recycling of nutrients in agricultural systems, as well as the challenges of, and opportunities for, transformations that seek to adjust nutrient cycles in modern agriculture. Pimentel’s legacy and contributions provide valuable insight into agriculture’s wicked nutrient challenge, as he framed the costs and opportunities of production systems across different scales of food production, developed foundational understanding of global resource challenges, promoted often marginalized or underemployed management strategies to enhance agriculture’s ecosystem services, confronted conventional wisdom and popular trends, and appropriately, attacked the use of “silver bullets” as singular solutions to ecological challenges and instead promoted systems-level analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • P. J. A. Kleinman & R. D. Harmel, 2024. "Grappling with the success and trade-offs of global nutrient redistribution," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 29793-29811, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03846-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03846-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03846-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03846-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Xin Zhang & Eric A. Davidson & Denise L. Mauzerall & Timothy D. Searchinger & Patrice Dumas & Ye Shen, 2015. "Managing nitrogen for sustainable development," Nature, Nature, vol. 528(7580), pages 51-59, December.
    3. Marissa A. De Boer & Anjelika G. Romeo-Hall & Tomas M. Rooimans & J. Chris Slootweg, 2018. "An Assessment of the Drivers and Barriers for the Deployment of Urban Phosphorus Recovery Technologies: A Case Study of The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Dana Cordell & Stuart White, 2011. "Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate about Long-Term Phosphorus Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Vibeke Bjornlund & Henning Bjornlund & Andre F. Van Rooyen, 2020. "Why agricultural production in sub-Saharan Africa remains low compared to the rest of the world – a historical perspective," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(S1), pages 20-53, October.
    6. Spiegal, Sheri & Kleinman, Peter J.A. & Endale, Dinku M. & Bryant, Ray B. & Dell, Curtis & Goslee, Sarah & Meinen, Robert J. & Flynn, K. Colton & Baker, John M. & Browning, Dawn M. & McCarty, Greg & B, 2020. "Manuresheds: Advancing nutrient recycling in US agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. James Elser & Elena Bennett, 2011. "A broken biogeochemical cycle," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7367), pages 29-31, October.
    8. Kaye-Blake, William & Schilling, Chris & Monaghan, Ross & Vibart, Ronaldo & Dennis, Samuel & Post, Elizabeth, 2019. "Quantification of environmental-economic trade-offs in nutrient management policies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 458-468.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Jama-Rodzeńska & Piotr Chohura & Bernard Gałka & Anna Szuba-Trznadel & Agnieszka Falkiewicz & Monika Białkowska, 2022. "Effect of Different Doses of Phosgreen Fertilization on Chlorophyll, K, and Ca Content in Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) Grown in Peat Substrate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Heidi M. Peterson & Lawrence A. Baker & Rimjhim M. Aggarwal & Treavor H. Boyer & Neng Iong Chan, 2022. "A transition management framework to stimulate a circular phosphorus system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1713-1737, February.
    3. Chowdhury, Rubel Biswas & Moore, Graham A. & Weatherley, Anthony J. & Arora, Meenakshi, 2014. "A review of recent substance flow analyses of phosphorus to identify priority management areas at different geographical scales," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-228.
    4. Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Sustainable Mineral Resource Management—Insights into the Case of Phosphorus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    5. Matthew Heron Wilson & Sarah Taylor Lovell, 2016. "Agroforestry—The Next Step in Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Andrea E. Ulrich & Ewald Schnug, 2013. "The Modern Phosphorus Sustainability Movement: A Profiling Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Walan, Petter & Davidsson, Simon & Johansson, Sheshti & Höök, Mikael, 2014. "Phosphate rock production and depletion: Regional disaggregated modeling and global implications," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 178-187.
    8. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Qiming Wang & Tao Zhang & Xinyue He & Rongfeng Jiang, 2017. "Assessment of Phosphorus Recovery from Swine Wastewater in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    10. James J Elser & Timothy J Elser & Stephen R Carpenter & William A Brock, 2014. "Regime Shift in Fertilizer Commodities Indicates More Turbulence Ahead for Food Security," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
    11. Xin Nie & Jianxian Wu & Han Wang & Weijuan Li & Chengdao Huang & Lihua Li, 2022. "Contributing to carbon peak: Estimating the causal impact of eco‐industrial parks on low‐carbon development in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1578-1593, August.
    12. Kataki, Sampriti & West, Helen & Clarke, Michèle & Baruah, D.C., 2016. "Phosphorus recovery as struvite: Recent concerns for use of seed, alternative Mg source, nitrogen conservation and fertilizer potential," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 142-156.
    13. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Otavio Ananias Pereira da Silva & Dayane Bortoloto da Silva & Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira-Filho & Tays Batista Silva & Cid Naudi Silva Campos & Fabio Henrique Rojo Baio & Gileno Brito de Azevedo, 2023. "Macro- and Micronutrient Contents and Their Relationship with Growth in Six Eucalyptus Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Jiuliang Xu & Liangquan Wu & Bingxin Tong & Jiaxu Yin & Zican Huang & Wei Li & Xuexian Li, 2021. "Magnesium Supplementation Alters Leaf Metabolic Pathways for Higher Flavor Quality of Oolong Tea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    16. Agnieszka Sobolewska & Marcin Bukowski, 2025. "Consumption of Nitrogen Fertilizers in the EU—External Costs of Their Production by Country of Application," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Daniel Reißmann & Daniela Thrän & Alberto Bezama, 2018. "Key Development Factors of Hydrothermal Processes in Germany by 2030: A Fuzzy Logic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Oscar Montes de Oca Munguia & Rick Llewellyn, 2020. "The Adopters versus the Technology: Which Matters More when Predicting or Explaining Adoption?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 80-91, March.
    19. Karel Mulder, 2019. "Future Options for Sewage and Drainage Systems Three Scenarios for Transitions and Continuity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03846-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.