IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i12p1279-d703668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Various Rates of P from Alternative and Traditional Sources on Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) Grown on Peat Substrate

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Jama-Rodzeńska

    (Faculty of Life Sciences and Tevchnology, Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Piotr Chochura

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Bernard Gałka

    (Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Institute of Soil Science and Environmental Protection, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Anna Szuba-Trznadel

    (Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Zlatko Svecnjak

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Dragana Latkovic

    (Department of Field and Vegetable Crops, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

Abstract

Previous research indicated the potential use of struvite (STR) as an alternative source of phosphorus (P) in crop production. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of STR and triple superphosphate (TSP) on the growth and chemical composition of butterhead lettuce grown on peat substrate over a three-month period (May–July). Both alternative (STR) and conventional (TSP) fertilizers were applied at three rates: (1) recommended rate based on the elemental content of substrate and crop nutritional need; (2) reduced rate (50% lower than recommended); and (3) increased rate (50% higher than recommended). Unfertilized (control) plants were also grown in the pot experiment. As expected, fertilizer application tended to increase the content of heavy metals in the substrate. Thus, an increase in Zn, Pb, and Cu content in peat substrate was found following STR amendments. However, compared with unfertilized plants, the applied rates of the STR and TSP fertilizers did not increase the content of Cd and Cu in the plant leaf, while Hg content was below the detection limit. In addition, Zn content in the plant leaf significantly decreased following STR and TSP applications. In comparison to unfertilized plants, both alternative and conventional fertilizers increased the content of P and nitrate nitrogen (N-NO 3 − ) in the plant leaf while their effect on Mg content was negligible. The increased rate of STR was the best fertilizer treatment because it produced the largest number of leaves, which were also characterized by the highest P content. Our findings showed that STR was an effective source of P in butterhead lettuce cultivation without adverse effects on heavy metal accumulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Jama-Rodzeńska & Piotr Chochura & Bernard Gałka & Anna Szuba-Trznadel & Zlatko Svecnjak & Dragana Latkovic, 2021. "Effect of Various Rates of P from Alternative and Traditional Sources on Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) Grown on Peat Substrate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1279-:d:703668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Jama-Rodzeńska & Piotr Chohura & Bernard Gałka & Anna Szuba-Trznadel & Agnieszka Falkiewicz & Monika Białkowska, 2022. "Effect of Different Doses of Phosgreen Fertilization on Chlorophyll, K, and Ca Content in Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) Grown in Peat Substrate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1279-:d:703668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.