IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i4p281-d523799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organic Beekeeping Practices in Romania: Status and Perspectives towards a Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Bianca Pocol

    (Department of Animal Production and Food Safety, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, 400372 Cluj Napoca, Romania)

  • Peter Šedík

    (Center for Research and Educational Projects, Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Ioan Sebastian Brumă

    (“Gh. Zane” Institute for Economic and Social Research, Romanian Academy, Iași Branch, 700481 Iași, Romania)

  • Antonio Amuza

    (Department of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Aurica Chirsanova

    (Department of Food and Nutrition, Technical University of Moldova, 168, Stefan cel Mare Bd., MD-2004 Chișinău, Moldova)

Abstract

Romanian beekeeping faces a lot of challenges nowadays due to the problems related to climate change, the use of pesticides in agriculture, but also to the pandemic crisis. In this context, organic beekeeping represents an important alternative to traditional apicultural practices. The purpose of the study was to present the current situation of organic beekeeping in Romania, but also to identify some aspects related to sustainability. The research methodology was based on secondary and primary data. An online survey was conducted in 2020 on a sample of 433 Romanian beekeepers. The main findings showed that the majority of participants were aware of organic principles and were familiar with the concept of sustainability in beekeeping. However, only a small percentage of beekeepers were certified in the organic system. The evaluation of the concept of sustainability showed that the most important factor for the surveyed beekeepers was the environmental aspect, followed by the economic and social components. The pandemic crisis has negatively impacted the beekeepers’ activities due to travel restrictions and the limited access to the apiaries. If, in economic terms, they were affected by the sales drop in the first months of the crisis, there were also some positive effects such as the increase in demand for health-related products.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Bianca Pocol & Peter Šedík & Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Antonio Amuza & Aurica Chirsanova, 2021. "Organic Beekeeping Practices in Romania: Status and Perspectives towards a Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:281-:d:523799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedrich, Nina & Heyder, Matthias & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2012. "Sustainability Management in Agribusiness: Challenges, Concepts, Responsibilities and Performance," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Kouchner, Coline & Ferrus, Cécile & Blanchard, Samuel & Decourtye, Axel & Basso, Benjamin & Le Conte, Yves & Tchamitchian, Marc, 2019. "Bee farming system sustainability: An assessment framework in metropolitan France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Nancy Diana Panta, 2020. "Applying Value Chain Analysis through the Lens of Sustainability to Enterprises in the Beekeeping Sector," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 12, pages 107-116, Editura Lumen.
    4. Friedrich, Nina & Heyder, Matthias & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2012. "Sustainability Management in Agribusiness: Challenges, Concepts, Responsibilities and Performance," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144979, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    5. Alina Butu & Codrin Dinu Vasiliu & Steliana Rodino & Ioan-Sebastian Brumă & Lucian Tanasă & Marian Butu, 2019. "The Anthropological Analysis of the Key Determinants on the Purchase Decision Taken by the Romanian Consumers Regarding the Ecological Agroalimentary Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Zdenka Kádeková & Radovan Savov & Ingrida Košičiarová & Katarina Valaskova, 2020. "CSR Activities and Their Impact on Brand Value in Food Enterprises in Slovakia Based on Foreign Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aliz Feketéné Ferenczi & Isván Szűcs & Andrea Bauerné Gáthy, 2023. "Evaluation of the Pollination Ecosystem Service of the Honey Bee ( Apis mellifera ) Based on a Beekeeping Model in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Olatz Etxegarai-Legarreta & Valeriano Sanchez-Famoso, 2022. "The Role of Beekeeping in the Generation of Goods and Services: The Interrelation between Environmental, Socioeconomic, and Sociocultural Utilities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. John Mwandifura1 & Innocent Mharidzo & Dr. Lovemore Chikazhe & Dr. J Manyeruke & Dr. N Mashavakure & Benny Chidziso, 2021. "Benefits of Beekeeping in Rural Areas: Insights from Chipinge District in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(12), pages 73-84, December.
    4. Arianna Pignagnoli & Stefano Pignedoli & Emanuele Carpana & Cecilia Costa & Aldo Dal Prà, 2021. "Carbon Footprint of Honey in Different Beekeeping Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Andy Felix Jităreanu & Mioara Mihăilă & Alexandru-Dragoș Robu & Florin-Daniel Lipșa & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Aida Albu & Răzvan-Mihail Radu-Rusu & Daniel Simeanu & Cristina-Gabriela Radu-Rusu & Ioan Mircea Pop, 2022. "Phenolic and Total Flavonoid Contents and Physicochemical Traits of Romanian Monofloral Honeys," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nancy Diana Panta, 2020. "Applying Value Chain Analysis through the Lens of Sustainability to Enterprises in the Beekeeping Sector," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 12, pages 107-116, Editura Lumen.
    2. Luhmann, Henrike & Schaper, Christian & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "Acceptance of a Sustainability Standard: Evidence from an Empirical Study of Future-Oriented Dairy Farmers," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244538, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Anup Raj & Andrei Kuznetsov & Thankom Gopinath Arun, 2020. "Culture of Sustainability and Marketing Orientation of Indian Agribusiness in implementing CSR Programs—Insights from Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Luhmann, Henrike & Schaper, Christian & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "Future-Oriented Dairy Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in a Sustainability Standard: Evidence from an Empirical Study in Germany," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, July.
    5. PANȚA Nancy Diana, 2017. "Arguments In Favor Of Moving To A Sustainable Business Model In The Apiary Industry," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 159-170, December.
    6. Luhmann, Henrike & Schape, Christian & Theuvsen, Ludwig & Weiland, Ingke, 2016. "Was Bedingt Die Bereitschaft Deutscher Milcherzeuger Zur Teilnahme An Einem Nachhaltigkeitsstandard? Ergebnisse Einer Empirischen Untersuchung," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244758, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Heinen, Sarah & Hartmann, Monika, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the German Pork Industry: Relevance and Determinants," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164733, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    8. Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Codrin Dinu Vasiliu & Steliana Rodino & Marian Butu & Lucian Tanasă & Sebastian Doboș & Alina Butu & Oana Coca & Gavril Stefan, 2021. "The Behavior of Dairy Consumers in Short Food Supply Chains during COVID-19 Pandemic in Suceava Area, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Joanne Lee Picknoll & Pieter Poot & Michael Renton, 2021. "A New Approach to Inform Restoration and Management Decisions for Sustainable Apiculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Anetta Barska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2020. "E-Consumers and Local Food Products: A Perspective for Developing Online Shopping for Local Goods in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Cristina Cautisanu & Lucian Tanasă & Gabriel Vasile Hoha, 2021. "Sustainability in the Case of Small Vegetable Farmers: A Matrix Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-32, September.
    12. Pablo Farías, 2021. "The Local Aspect in the Successful Brands in Latin America: Empirical Evidence of Its Prevalence, the Role of Local and Global Companies, and Its Effect on Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    13. PANTA Nancy Diana, 2021. "Operationalizing Farm Sustainability, Particularities From The Beekeeping Sector," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 73(Special), pages 218-229, December.
    14. Purevdulam Altantsetseg & Alaleh Dadvari & Tsevegjav Munkhdelger & Gerelt-Od Lkhagvasuren & Massoud Moslehpour, 2020. "Sustainable Development of Entrepreneurial Orientation through Social Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Konefal, Jason & de Olde, Evelien M. & Hatanaka, Maki & Oosterveer, Peter J.M., 2023. "Signs of agricultural sustainability: A global assessment of sustainability governance initiatives and their indicators in crop farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Dan Bodescu & Alexandru-Dragoş Robu & Andy Felix Jităreanu & Ioan Puiu & Andrei Mihai Gafencu & Florin Daniel Lipşa, 2022. "Work Satisfaction in the Food Industry—A Premise for Economic Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Rodek, Nora & Birkner, Zoltán & Máhr, Tivadar & Rentz, Tamás, 2020. "A Corporate Sustainable Responsibility Management Tool that Supports the Sustainable Development Goals," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2020), Virtual Conference, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Virtual Conference, 10-12 September 2020, pages 377-387, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:281-:d:523799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.