IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i2p162-d500771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Body Condition Score from Liveweight Records of Mature Romney Ewes

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmy Semakula

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand
    National Agricultural Research Organization, P.O Box 295 Entebbe, Uganda)

  • Rene A. Corner-Thomas

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand)

  • Stephen T. Morris

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand)

  • Hugh T. Blair

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand)

  • Paul R. Kenyon

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand)

Abstract

Body condition score (BCS) in sheep ( Ovis aries ) is a widely used subjective measure of the degree of soft tissue coverage. Body condition score and liveweight are statistically related in ewes; therefore, it was hypothesized that BCS could be accurately predicted from liveweight using machine learning models. Individual ewe liveweight and body condition score data at each stage of the annual cycle (pre-breeding, pregnancy diagnosis, pre-lambing and weaning) at 43 to 54 months of age were used. Nine machine learning (ML) algorithms (ordinal logistic regression, multinomial regression, linear discriminant analysis, classification and regression tree, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, neural networks and gradient boosting decision trees) were applied to predict BCS from a ewe’s current and previous liveweight record. A three class BCS (1.0–2.0, 2.5–3.5, >3.5) scale was used due to high-class imbalance in the five-scale BCS data. The results showed that using ML to predict ewe BCS at 43 to 54 months of age from current and previous liveweight could be achieved with high accuracy (>85%) across all stages of the annual cycle. The gradient boosting decision tree algorithm (XGB) was the most efficient for BCS prediction regardless of season. All models had balanced specificity and sensitivity. The findings suggest that there is potential for predicting ewe BCS from liveweight using classification machine learning algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmy Semakula & Rene A. Corner-Thomas & Stephen T. Morris & Hugh T. Blair & Paul R. Kenyon, 2021. "Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Body Condition Score from Liveweight Records of Mature Romney Ewes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:162-:d:500771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Horn, 1965. "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(2), pages 179-185, June.
    2. Kuhn, Max, 2008. "Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i05).
    3. Lê, Sébastien & Josse, Julie & Husson, François, 2008. "FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 25(i01).
    4. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bellotti, Anthony & Brigo, Damiano & Gambetti, Paolo & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Forecasting recovery rates on non-performing loans with machine learning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 428-444.
    2. Štefan Lyócsa & Petra Vašaničová & Branka Hadji Misheva & Marko Dávid Vateha, 2022. "Default or profit scoring credit systems? Evidence from European and US peer-to-peer lending markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    4. Jun Wang & Jinyong Huang & Yunlong Hu & Qianwen Guo & Shasha Zhang & Jinglin Tian & Yanqin Niu & Ling Ji & Yuzhong Xu & Peijun Tang & Yaqin He & Yuna Wang & Shuya Zhang & Hao Yang & Kang Kang & Xinchu, 2024. "Terminal modifications independent cell-free RNA sequencing enables sensitive early cancer detection and classification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Dario Krpan & Jonathan E. Booth & Andreea Damien, 2023. "The positive–negative–competence (PNC) model of psychological responses to representations of robots," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1933-1954, November.
    6. Siddharth Sethi & David Zhang & Sebastian Guelfi & Zhongbo Chen & Sonia Garcia-Ruiz & Emmanuel O. Olagbaju & Mina Ryten & Harpreet Saini & Juan A. Botia, 2022. "Leveraging omic features with F3UTER enables identification of unannotated 3’UTRs for synaptic genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Michimasa Fujiogi & Yoshihiko Raita & Marcos Pérez-Losada & Robert J. Freishtat & Juan C. Celedón & Jonathan M. Mansbach & Pedro A. Piedra & Zhaozhong Zhu & Carlos A. Camargo & Kohei Hasegawa, 2022. "Integrated relationship of nasopharyngeal airway host response and microbiome associates with bronchiolitis severity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Erik Duijvelaar & Jack Gisby & James E. Peters & Harm Jan Bogaard & Jurjan Aman, 2024. "Longitudinal plasma proteomics reveals biomarkers of alveolar-capillary barrier disruption in critically ill COVID-19 patients," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Paweł Teisseyre & Robert A. Kłopotek & Jan Mielniczuk, 2016. "Random Subspace Method for high-dimensional regression with the R package regRSM," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 943-972, September.
    10. Satre-Meloy, Aven & Diakonova, Marina & Grünewald, Philipp, 2020. "Cluster analysis and prediction of residential peak demand profiles using occupant activity data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. María Bueno Álvez & Fredrik Edfors & Kalle Feilitzen & Martin Zwahlen & Adil Mardinoglu & Per-Henrik Edqvist & Tobias Sjöblom & Emma Lundin & Natallia Rameika & Gunilla Enblad & Henrik Lindman & Marti, 2023. "Next generation pan-cancer blood proteome profiling using proximity extension assay," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Markus Heckel & Kiyohiko G. Nishimura, 2020. "Unconventional Monetary Policy through Open Market Operations: A Principal Component Analysis," CARF F-Series CARF-F-501, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    13. Fitzpatrick, Trevor & Mues, Christophe, 2016. "An empirical comparison of classification algorithms for mortgage default prediction: evidence from a distressed mortgage market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 427-439.
    14. Hokuto Nakata & Akifumi Eguchi & Shouta M. M. Nakayama & John Yabe & Kaampwe Muzandu & Yoshinori Ikenaka & Chisato Mori & Mayumi Ishizuka, 2022. "Metabolomic Alteration in the Plasma of Wild Rodents Environmentally Exposed to Lead: A Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Patrick C Eschenfeldt & Uri Kartoun & Curtis R Heberle & Chung Yin Kong & Norman S Nishioka & Kenney Ng & Sagar Kamarthi & Chin Hur, 2018. "Analysis of factors associated with extended recovery time after colonoscopy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Rachel Sippy & Daniel F Farrell & Daniel A Lichtenstein & Ryan Nightingale & Megan A Harris & Joseph Toth & Paris Hantztidiamantis & Nicholas Usher & Cinthya Cueva Aponte & Julio Barzallo Aguilar & An, 2020. "Severity Index for Suspected Arbovirus (SISA): Machine learning for accurate prediction of hospitalization in subjects suspected of arboviral infection," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Joshua P White & Simon Dennis & Martin Tomko & Jessica Bell & Stephan Winter, 2021. "Paths to social licence for tracking-data analytics in university research and services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Denis S. Zavorotnyuk & Anatoly A. Sorokin & Stanislav I. Pekov & Denis S. Bormotov & Vasiliy A. Eliferov & Konstantin V. Bocharov & Eugene N. Nikolaev & Igor A. Popov, 2023. "Shapley Value as a Quality Control for Mass Spectra of Human Glioblastoma Tissues," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    19. Jack S. Gisby & Norzawani B. Buang & Artemis Papadaki & Candice L. Clarke & Talat H. Malik & Nicholas Medjeral-Thomas & Damiola Pinheiro & Paige M. Mortimer & Shanice Lewis & Eleanor Sandhu & Stephen , 2022. "Multi-omics identify falling LRRC15 as a COVID-19 severity marker and persistent pro-thrombotic signals in convalescence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Karpinska, Lilia & Śmiech, Sławomir, 2021. "Breaking the cycle of energy poverty. Will Poland make it?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:162-:d:500771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.