IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i5p165-d1644371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Strategic Agility Help Retain Public Sector Employees in Times of Uncertainty? A Longitudinal Study

Author

Listed:
  • Iveta Ludviga

    (Department of Business and Economics, RISEBA University of Applied Sciences, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Agita Kalvina

    (Department of Business and Economics, RISEBA University of Applied Sciences, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

The world is undergoing significant transformations that compel leaders to embrace more resilient and agile approaches to sustain positive organizational performance. While research concerning organizational strategic agility is growing, its value and application in the public sector are under-researched. This paper aims to explore the role of organizational strategic agility (OSA) in public sector organizations, how perceived OSA contributes to employee intentions to stay, and identify whether this effect is sustained over times of uncertainty. We use a longitudinal study and panel data from the public sector annual engagement survey before, during, and after the COVID-19 crisis, and perform a fixed-effect OLS regression to empirically analyze the impact of the employee perception of trust in leadership, supervisor support, and organizational strategic agility on employee intention to stay (ITS). The findings provide evidence of the value of organizational strategic agility for employees of the organization as a factor positively contributing to intentions to stay in times of uncertainty and identify trust in leadership as an essential contributor to developing OSA in the public sector. It contributes to understanding the value of organizational strategic agility for employees inside the organization in times of uncertainty. It captures the positive effect on employees over organizational and time effects, thus providing evidence of sustained impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Iveta Ludviga & Agita Kalvina, 2025. "Can Strategic Agility Help Retain Public Sector Employees in Times of Uncertainty? A Longitudinal Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:165-:d:1644371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/5/165/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/5/165/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    2. Rima Zitkiene & Mindaugas Deksnys, 2018. "Organizational Agility Conceptual Model," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(2), pages 115-129.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    2. Ramendra Pratap Singh & Neelotpaul Banerjee, 2018. "Exploring the Influence of Celebrity Credibility on Brand Attitude, Advertisement Attitude and Purchase Intention," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1622-1639, December.
    3. Muhamad Azrin Nazri & Nor Asiah Omar & Aini Aman & Abu Hanifah Ayob & Nur Ainna Ramli, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Performance in Takaful Agencies: The Moderating Role of Objective Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Yadav, Sanjeev & Kumar, Anil & Majumdar, Abhijit & Luthra, Sunil & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2023. "The influence of artificial intelligence techniques on disruption management: Does supply chain dynamism matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    6. Mohamed Albaity & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2021. "Customer Loyalty towards Islamic Banks: The Mediating Role of Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Harishchandra Singh Rathod & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "I Am Ready to Invest in Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) Options Only If the Returns Are Not Compromised: Individual Investors’ Intentions toward SRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Kent Marett & Shan Xiao & Sumin Kim, 2023. "Security compliance and work-issued mobile devices: Out of sight, out of mind?," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 913-945, December.
    9. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman & Gautam Srivastava & Peter Kilbourn & Nishikant Mishra, 2024. "Buyer–supplier partnerships and circular economy performance in food supply chains: Serial mediation by commitment contract and innovation performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1247-1264, February.
    10. Eduardo Terán-Yépez & David Jiménez-Castillo & Manuel Sánchez-Pérez, 2023. "The role of affect in international opportunity recognition and the formation of international opportunity beliefs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 941-983, April.
    11. Timothy Amoako & Hao Chen & Stephen Abiam Danso & Edem Segbefia, 2025. "The Role of Top Management Involvement and Supply Chain Integration on Smes’ Innovation Performance: Moderation Impact of Firm Experience Capability," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 5419-5452, March.
    12. Hung M. Nguyen & George Onofrei & Dothang Truong & Simon Lockrey, 2020. "Customer green orientation and process innovation alignment: A configuration approach in the global manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2498-2513, September.
    13. Alshehri, Abdullah, 2025. "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients, understanding factors affecting customer loyalty in unmanned convenience store using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    15. Anwar Sadat Shimul & Isaac Cheah & Mahabubur Rahman, 2025. "Consumers’ dark personality traits drive gluckschmerz: the interplay of competitiveness and brand love," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(2), pages 112-130, March.
    16. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara & Profumo, Giorgia, 2024. "Which trust layer better counterbalances the risk impact on travel intentions in a crisis scenario?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Christian Linder & Michael Nippa, 2019. "Jumping in at the deep end! The role of motivational forces in starting a new venture," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1363-1391, December.
    18. Khaksar, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh & Shahmehr, Fatemeh S. & Miah, Shah & Daim, Tugrul & Ozdemir, Dilek, 2024. "Privacy concerns versus personalisation benefits in social robot acceptance by employees: A paradox theory — Contingency perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Anupam Kumar Das & Shetu Ranjan Biswas & Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Strategy and Voluntary Environmental Behavior—Mediating Effect of Psychological Green Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Mohammed Salah Hassan & Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin & Norma Mansor & Hussam Al Halbusi, 2021. "An Examination of Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Discretion and the Moderating Role of Supervisory Support: Evidence from the Field," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:165-:d:1644371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.