IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i7p134-d1422714.html

The Past, Present, and Future of Cross-Border Cooperation between Municipalities in the South Bohemian Region: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jiří Dušek

    (Department of Management of Public Administration, The College of European and Regional Studies, Žižkova tř. 1632/5b, 370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive view of matters of cross-border cooperation, with the main emphasis on the typology and development of structures supporting cross-border cooperation in a selected region of the Czech Republic (South Bohemian Region). The study focuses on the analysis of changes in the methods and ways of cooperation of municipalities in the programming periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020 (Euroregions, cross-border impulse centers, European territorial cooperation groups, partner and friendly cities, etc.). The research not only analyzes the actual development of cooperation between municipalities in the region studied, but also identifies the prerequisites of and barriers to cross-border cooperation. The data obtained show a significant decrease in the interest of municipalities in cross-border cooperation within the conditions of the Czech Republic in recent years. The current situation with regard to the existence and development of cross-border cooperation in 2024 is not very satisfactory, although it is paradoxically an area strongly supported by the EU Cohesion Policy. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative research methods to provide a comprehensive analysis of cross-border cooperation in the South Bohemian Region. A thorough review of existing literature on cross-border cooperation and related policies was conducted to establish a theoretical framework. The practical part of the study is based on field research carried out by the author in 2007–2013 and 2014–2020. This research examined the level of cooperation between the 623 municipalities in the South Bohemian Region (in 2016, there were 624 municipalities in the region). In the case of cross-border impulse centers, the input data were represented by e-mail and telephone inquiries to representatives of individual municipalities and the websites of Euroregions. To conduct a comprehensive study on cross-border cooperation between municipalities in the South Bohemian Region, logical and scientific methods were used. Universal methods of logic ensured the correctness and orderliness of the thought process, with abstraction identifying key elements. Synthesis was used to divide the study into parts, analyze them in detail, and integrate them into a comprehensive analysis. Scientific methods included analysis to examine the current status and frameworks of cross-border cooperation and comparison to identify similarities or differences between the Czech Republic and neighboring countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiří Dušek, 2024. "The Past, Present, and Future of Cross-Border Cooperation between Municipalities in the South Bohemian Region: A Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:134-:d:1422714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/7/134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/7/134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2019. "Measuring the impact of legal and administrative international barriers on regional growth," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 345-366, June.
    2. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.
    3. Micaela Antunes & Miguel Viegas & Celeste Varum & Carlos Pinho, 2020. "The Impact of Structural Funds on Regional Growth: A Panel Data Spatial Analysis," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(5), pages 312-319, September.
    4. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    5. Daniel Rauhut & Alois Humer, 2020. "EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth: trajectories in economic thought," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(11), pages 2116-2133, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Destefanis & Valter Di Giacinto, 2025. "The Heterogeneous Effects of EU Structural Funds: A Spatial VAR Approach," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 497-517, March.
    2. Tiganasu, Ramona & Lupu, Dan, 2023. "Institutional quality and digitalization: Drivers in accessing European funds at regional level?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Breaking Down the Border: Physical, Institutional and Cultural Obstacles," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(5), pages 485-513, October.
    4. Fricke, Carola, 2014. "Grenzüberschreitende Governance in der Raumplanung: Organisations- und Kooperationsformen in Basel und Lille," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 62-78, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    5. Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 123-152, September.
    6. Sergio Destefanis & Valter Di Giacinto, 2022. "EU structural funds and GDP per capita: Spatial VAR evidence for the European regions," Discussion Paper series in Regional Science & Economic Geography 2022-09, Gran Sasso Science Institute, Social Sciences, revised Oct 2024.
    7. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Elisa Panzera, 2023. "Economic costs of COVID‐19 for cross‐border regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(8), pages 1688-1701, October.
    8. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    9. Marko Šostar & Vladimir Ristanović & Chamaru de Alwis, 2023. "Application of Successful EU Funds Absorption Models to Sustainable Regional Development," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, August.
    10. Atul Mishra, 2008. "Boundaries and Territoriality in South Asia," International Studies, , vol. 45(2), pages 105-132, April.
    11. Nikolitsa Spilioti & Athanasios Anastasiou, 2024. "European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs) and Regional Development across the European Union (EU)," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, May.
    12. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Contested Borders: Globalization and Ethnonational Conflict in Ireland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 681-696.
    13. Marcus Gumpert, 2024. "Regional economic disparities under the Solow model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1017-1037, April.
    14. SOHN Christophe & LICHERON Julien, 2015. "From barrier to resource? Modelling the border effects on metropolitan functions in Europe," LISER Working Paper Series 2015-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    15. Mirko Kruse & Melanie Mesloh & Jan Wedemeier, 2022. "Smart Specialisation and Resilience: How Future-Proof are European Regions?," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 16(1), pages 34-50, JUNE.
    16. Christophe Sohn & Julien Licheron & Evert Meijers, 2022. "Border cities: Out of the shadow," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 417-438, April.
    17. Jorde Eduardo Mendoza & Bruno Dupeyron, 2017. "Economic Integration, Emerging Fields and Cross-border Governance: The Case of San Diego–Tijuana," Post-Print halshs-01588578, HAL.
    18. Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces. A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Discussion Papers 2009/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    19. Barbara Demeterova & Tatjana Fischer & Jürgen Schmude, 2020. "The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Karlheinz Knickel & Alexandra Almeida & Francesca Galli & Kerstin Hausegger-Nestelberger & Bryonny Goodwin-Hawkins & Mojca Hrabar & Daniel Keech & Marina Knickel & Olli Lehtonen & Damian Maye & Irune , 2021. "Transitioning towards a Sustainable Wellbeing Economy—Implications for Rural–Urban Relations," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:134-:d:1422714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.