IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i5p99-d1393360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fintech: Evidence of the Urgent Need to Improve Financial Literacy in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Costa

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    GOVCOPP—Research Unit on Government, Competitiveness and Public Policies, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Ana Moreira

    (School of Psychology, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, Rua do Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
    APPsyCI—Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities and Inclusion, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal
    Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Europeia, Quinta do Bom Nome, Estr. da Correia 53, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Fintech has revolutionized the financial sector, providing a new way of providing banking services. Since Fintech can provide the same services as traditional banks but entirely online, it is a competitor. As a result, consumers’ relationships with banking have inevitably changed, and it is therefore relevant to analyze these changes. The main objective of this study is to understand people’s perceptions of Fintech, their level of knowledge about it, and the impact of its emergence on traditional banking. The study sample consisted of 174 participants. A quantitative methodology was used to test the hypotheses formulated. The results show that participants who know about Fintech and perceive it as safe have a greater intention of changing banks. On the other hand, they perceive that supervision and regulation in traditional banks is higher than in Fintech. Among the reasons for becoming a Fintech customer, the most mentioned were lower costs and the fact that they provide greater convenience and ease of use. It will be in Fintech’s interest to continue working with regulators so that the sector makes progress in this area and consumers can recognize greater equality between traditional banks and Fintech in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Costa & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira & Ana Moreira, 2024. "Fintech: Evidence of the Urgent Need to Improve Financial Literacy in Portugal," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:99-:d:1393360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/5/99/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/5/99/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry Eichengreen, 2023. "Financial regulation in the age of the platform economy," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 40-50, March.
    2. Christian Haddad & Lars Hornuf, 2019. "The emergence of the global fintech market: economic and technological determinants," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 81-105, June.
    3. Chen, S. & Doerr, S. & Frost, J. & Gambacorta, L. & Shin, H.S., 2023. "The fintech gender gap," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucas A. Mariani & Jose Renato Haas Ornelas & Bernardo Ricca, 2023. "Banks’ Physical Footprint and Financial Technology Adoption," Working Papers Series 576, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    2. Kyriazis, Nikolaos & Corbet, Shaen, 2024. "Evaluating the dynamic connectedness of financial assets and bank indices during black-swan events: A Quantile-VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Doerr, Sebastian & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2023. "Big techs in finance," CEPR Discussion Papers 18665, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Fiorella De Fiore & Leonardo Gambacorta & Cristina Manea, 2023. "Big techs and the credit channel of monetary policy," BIS Working Papers 1088, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Johannes Treu, 2023. "The Chance of FinTech to be a New General-Purpose Technology," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Kowalewski, Oskar & Pisany, Paweł, 2022. "Banks' consumer lending reaction to fintech and bigtech credit emergence in the context of soft versus hard credit information processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Michael L. Polemis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2023. "The environmental consequences of blockchain technology: A Bayesian quantile cointegration analysis for Bitcoin," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1602-1621, April.
    8. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Wang, Xiaoting & Hou, Siyuan & Kyaw, Khine & Xue, Xupeng & Liu, Xueqin, 2023. "Exploring the determinants of Fintech Credit: A comprehensive analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Mariani, Lucas A. & Haas Ornelas, José Renato & Ricca, Bernardo, 2023. "Banks’ Physical Footprint and Financial Technology Adoption," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12812, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Fahimeh Khatami & Enrico Cagno & Luboš Smrčka & Zoltan Rozsa, 2024. "Assessing the role of FinTech in entrepreneurial ecosystems at the international level," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3373-3402, December.
    12. Auer, Raphael & Tercero-Lucas, David, 2022. "Distrust or speculation? The socioeconomic drivers of U.S. cryptocurrency investments," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Mohd Afjal & Chinnadurai Kathiravan & Leo Paul Dana & Chitra Devi Nagarajan, 2023. "The Dynamic Impact of Financial Technology and Energy Consumption on Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Tobias Berg & Andreas Fuster & Manju Puri, 2022. "FinTech Lending," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 187-207, November.
    15. Hanan Qudah & Sari Malahim & Rula Airout & Mohammad Alomari & Aiman Abu Hamour & Mohammad Alqudah, 2023. "Islamic Finance in the Era of Financial Technology: A Bibliometric Review of Future Trends," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Olivier Armantier & Sebastian Doerr & Jon Frost & Andreas Fuster & Kelly Shue, 2024. "Nothing to hide? Gender and age differences in willingness to share data," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 24-99, Swiss Finance Institute.
    17. Carin van der Cruijsen & Marie-Claire Broekhoff, 2024. "Gender gaps in the world of payments," Working Papers 805, DNB.
    18. Johannes Treu, 2024. "Moving Beyond Silo Thinking: A Deductive Analysis of Financial Literacy, Financial Inclusion, FinTech, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 1-1, February.
    19. Pacelli, Vincenzo & Miglietta, Federica & Foglia, Matteo, 2022. "The extreme risk connectedness of the new financial system: European evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Sylvia Rohlfer & Jay Rajasekera, 2020. "An Eco-Systematic View of Cross-Sector Fintech: The Case of Alibaba and Tencent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:99-:d:1393360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.