IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The FOMC in 1998: can it get any better than this?


  • David C. Wheelock


The U.S. economy turned in another solid performance during 1998, with faster real growth and employment gains, and lower inflation, than many observers had expected. From the standpoint of monetary policy, the year's pivotal point occurred in August, when the Russian government defaulted on its domestic debt and devalued the ruble. Before August, policymakers focused on whether an explicit policy tightening would be needed to slow domestic demand enough to prevent an increase in inflation. Financial market upset triggered by the Russian government's actions, coupled with ongoing concern about economic weakness in Asia and Latin America, precipitated a scramble for liquidity and safety affecting U.S. financial markets. The FOMC accommodated the increased demand for liquidity by easing policy on three occasions. These actions were taken not just to assuage financial markets, but to preserve the ongoing economic expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • David C. Wheelock, 1999. "The FOMC in 1998: can it get any better than this?," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jul, pages 11-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedlrv:y:1999:i:jul:p:11-22:n:v.81no.4

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint," NBER Chapters,in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 347-374 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Michael Bruno & William Easterly, 1996. "Inflation and growth: in search of a stable relationship," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue May, pages 139-146.
    3. William G. Dewald, 1998. "M2 velocity looks to be on a new track," Monetary Trends, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Oct.
    4. Orphanides, Athanasios, 2003. "Monetary policy evaluation with noisy information," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 605-631, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedlrv:y:1999:i:jul:p:11-22:n:v.81no.4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kathy Cosgrove). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.